Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Mo Bamba
Utah Jazz current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYER40.62024–25
NBA RANK#261of 422
PH$7.5MDepth · fictional game currencySTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MIN0.0governed role
NEXT GAME@ Memphis Grizzlies2026-10-21WHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN9.0
PTS1.3
REB3.3
AST0.3
STL0.0
BLK1.0
3PM0.0
FG%40.0%
3P%—
FT%—
+/--5.3
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · Utah Jazz
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED2.57pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT1 G0 PTS · 2 REB · 0 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT1 G0 PTS · 2 REB · 0 AST
creation—
efficiency—
minutes—
rebounding—
scoring—
Form label withheld: insufficient role-consistent sample. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS47.6%838/1762
2-POINT56.0%568/1014
3-POINT36.1%270/748
FREE THROW70.1%227/324
EFFECTIVE FG%55.2%
TRUE SHOOTING%57.0%
AST / TO1.09
PTS PER 3614.55rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 166 | 16.31 | 6.72 | 5.52 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.35 | 1.19 |
| Away | 154 | 17.34 | 6.87 | 5.47 | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.39 | 1.32 |
| Home − Away | — | -1.0 | -0.1 | +0.1 | -0.1 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.1 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0.84 | high |
| minutes | 10 | 16.3 | 23.4 | 16.8 | medium |
| points | 2 | 5 | 11 | 6.79 | high |
| rebounds | 2 | 5 | 8 | 5.5 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES299.1% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-04 | @ PHI | 21 | — | — | 4 | 2/3 | 2/3 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | -7.0 | 67% |
| 2026-01-03 | vs ATL | 2 | 2.04 | -1.8% | 0 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0% |
| 2025-12-29 | vs ORL | 4 | — | — | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -9.0 | — |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS0.0%0/3 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/3 games
5+ ASSISTS0.0%0/3 games
2+ THREES0.0%0/3 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
| Season | Team(s) | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | UTATOR | 3 | 9.0 | 1.3 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 40.0% | — | — |
| 2024–25 | NOPLAC | 32 | 12.9 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 0.6 | 46.4% | 27.8% | 70.4% |
| 2023–24 | PHI | 57 | 13.0 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 49.0% | 39.1% | 68.0% |
| 2022–23 | ORLLAL | 49 | 15.7 | 6.6 | 4.6 | 0.9 | 48.4% | 38.7% | 66.1% |
| 2021–22 | ORL | 71 | 25.7 | 10.7 | 8.1 | 1.2 | 47.9% | 38.1% | 78.1% |
| 2020–21 | ORL | 46 | 15.8 | 8.0 | 5.8 | 0.8 | 47.2% | 32.2% | 68.2% |
| 2019–20 | ORL | 62 | 14.2 | 5.3 | 4.9 | 0.7 | 46.2% | 34.6% | 67.4% |
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024–25 | LAC | 33 | 40.6 | #261 / 422 | 7.5M | Depth |
| 2023–24 | PHI | 57 | 44.2 | #187 / 409 | 10.8M | Rotation |
| 2022–23 | LAL | 52 | 48.6 | #118 / 408 | 13.3M | Rotation |
| 2021–22 | ORL | 71 | 47.4 | #136 / 423 | 16.9M | Core |
| 2020–21 | ORL | 67 | 50.1 | #111 / 410 | 13.7M | Rotation |
| 2019–20 | ORL | 70 | 43.5 | #174 / 385 | 11M | Rotation |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2024–25
AF-PLAYER40.6descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#261of 422 ranked
PH$7.5MDepth
SAMPLE33observed games
Ball security34
Box defence57
Creation13
Efficiency44
Rebounding75
Scoring28
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE—requires eligible AF-Player + governed role
AF MOVEMENT—two eligible completed seasons required
ROLE CHANGEUNAVAILABLEcomparison unavailable
STAR DEPENDENCY—governed What If sample unavailable
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
UTA
Utah Jazz
EXPECTED MIN11.6
SCORING SHARE3.9%
CREATION SHARE4.5%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR51.4%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.
TOR
Toronto Raptors
EXPECTED MIN1.4
SCORING SHARE0.0%
CREATION SHARE0.0%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR44.4%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.