Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Svi Mykhailiuk
Utah Jazz current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYER41.02025–26
NBA RANK#230of 409
PH$10.1MRotation · fictional game currencySTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MIN18.9governed role
NEXT GAME@ Memphis Grizzlies2026-10-21WHAT IF IMPACT-0.2 ppteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN23.4
PTS9.1
REB2.5
AST1.9
STL0.5
BLK0.1
3PM1.9
FG%46.5%
3P%39.3%
FT%89.3%
+/--2.1
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · Utah Jazz
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED11.47pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G3.4 PTS · 0.8 REB · 0.2 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G6.2 PTS · 2.2 REB · 1.2 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G1.7 PTS · 0.4 REB · 0.1 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G7.1 PTS · 2.7 REB · 1.7 AST
creation↓
efficiency↓
minutes↑
rebounding→
scoring→
MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS41.8%877/2098
2-POINT51.1%372/728
3-POINT36.9%505/1370
FREE THROW79.1%212/268
EFFECTIVE FG%53.8%
TRUE SHOOTING%55.8%
AST / TO1.69
PTS PER 3614.71rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 158 | 18.51 | 7.75 | 1.99 | 1.55 | 1.51 | 0.55 | 0.11 |
| Away | 176 | 17.75 | 7.08 | 2.03 | 1.54 | 1.51 | 0.57 | 0.1 |
| Home − Away | — | +0.8 | +0.7 | -0.0 | +0.0 | 0.0 | -0.0 | +0.0 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1.54 | high |
| minutes | 8.5 | 18 | 26.3 | 18.11 | high |
| points | 2 | 6 | 13 | 7.4 | high |
| rebounds | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2.01 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-05 | @ OKC | 23 | 5.05 | +355.7% | 17 | 6/16 | 1/2 | 5/14 | 0/0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | -2.0 | 53% |
| 2026-03-02 | vs DEN | 26 | 9.8 | +165.4% | 15 | 5/10 | 1/2 | 4/8 | 1/2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +5.0 | 69% |
| 2026-02-26 | vs NOP | 15 | 8.03 | +86.9% | 14 | 5/10 | 1/3 | 4/7 | 0/0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +4.0 | 70% |
| 2026-02-23 | @ HOU | 11 | 8.81 | +24.9% | 3 | 1/3 | 1/1 | 0/2 | 1/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -4.0 | 44% |
| 2026-02-12 | vs POR | 17 | 10.5 | +61.9% | 14 | 5/8 | 1/3 | 4/5 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | -3.0 | 88% |
| 2026-02-05 | @ ATL | 23 | — | — | 14 | 6/10 | 4/6 | 2/4 | 0/0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +10.0 | 70% |
| 2026-02-01 | @ TOR | 30 | — | — | 8 | 2/7 | 0/1 | 2/6 | 2/2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | +5.0 | 51% |
| 2026-01-30 | vs BKN | 21 | — | — | 3 | 1/6 | 0/2 | 1/4 | 0/0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -6.0 | 25% |
| 2026-01-28 | vs GSW | 16 | — | — | 2 | 1/5 | 1/2 | 0/3 | 0/0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | -16.0 | 20% |
| 2026-01-24 | vs MIA | 17 | — | — | 8 | 3/4 | 3/4 | 0/0 | 2/2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -15.0 | 82% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS6.3%3/48 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/48 games
5+ ASSISTS6.3%3/48 games
2+ THREES58.3%28/48 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
| Season | Team(s) | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | UTA | 48 | 23.4 | 9.1 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 46.5% | 39.3% | 89.3% |
| 2024–25 | UTA | 37 | 20.5 | 9.0 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 39.1% | 34.5% | 80.0% |
| 2023–24 | BOS | 41 | 10.1 | 4.0 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 41.6% | 38.9% | 66.7% |
| 2022–23 | NYKCHA | 31 | 15.1 | 7.2 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 44.5% | 42.4% | 66.7% |
| 2021–22 | TOR | 56 | 12.8 | 4.5 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 38.9% | 30.6% | 86.5% |
| 2020–21 | OKCDET | 65 | 20.0 | 8.6 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 41.3% | 33.7% | 76.0% |
| 2019–20 | DET | 56 | 22.6 | 9.0 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 41.0% | 40.4% | 81.4% |
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | UTA | 48 | 41.0 | #230 / 409 | 10.1M | Rotation |
| 2024–25 | UTA | 38 | 33.3 | #361 / 422 | 6.2M | Depth |
| 2023–24 | BOS | 49 | 37.8 | #290 / 409 | 7M | Depth |
| 2022–23 | CHA | 32 | 45.8 | #167 / 408 | 10.3M | Rotation |
| 2021–22 | TOR | 86 | 27.5 | #402 / 423 | 5.7M | Depth |
| 2020–21 | OKC | 70 | 34.7 | #331 / 410 | 7.4M | Depth |
| 2019–20 | DET | 62 | 37.9 | #259 / 385 | 8.9M | Depth |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2025–26
AF-PLAYER41.0descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#230of 409 ranked
PH$10.1MRotation
SAMPLE48observed games
Ball security74
Box defence14
Creation37
Efficiency59
Rebounding18
Scoring31
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE+8.8 ppAF-Player pct − Expected Minutes pct
AF MOVEMENT+29.4 pp2024–25 → 2025–26
ROLE CHANGECONTRACTING-4.5 min vs latest observed MPG
STAR DEPENDENCY22-0.2 pp next-game What If impact
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
UTA
Utah Jazz
EXPECTED MIN18.1
SCORING SHARE7.3%
CREATION SHARE6.3%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR72.2%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.