Player-safe accepted corpus.
PLAYER PROFILE · HISTORICAL
Russell Westbrook
Accepted historical regular-season production. No current 2026–27 roster status is inferred.
AF-PLAYER45.12025–26
NBA RANK#174of 409
PH$14.7MRotation · fictional game currencySTATUSHistoricalno current binding
EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported
NEXT GAMENo assigned gameSchedule pendingWHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN29.1
PTS15.1
REB5.5
AST6.7
STL1.4
BLK0.2
3PM2.0
FG%42.6%
3P%33.5%
FT%69.0%
+/--7.2
NEXT GAME
Current context
No current roster binding is published for this historical profile. ProbHoops does not infer a current team, availability or expected minutes from historical data.
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
Current form is unavailable because this historical profile is not bound to the governed 2026–27 roster. No current role is inferred.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED1.31pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G8.4 PTS · 2.2 REB · 5.2 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G14.7 PTS · 2.6 REB · 5.2 AST
creation↓
efficiency↓
minutes→
rebounding↓
scoring↓
COLD historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS44.7%3107/6957
2-POINT49.6%2548/5138
3-POINT30.7%559/1819
FREE THROW68.3%1399/2049
EFFECTIVE FG%48.7%
TRUE SHOOTING%52.0%
AST / TO2.02
PTS PER 3620.34rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 243 | 30.48 | 17.57 | 6.86 | 7.21 | 1.33 | 1.29 | 0.33 |
| Away | 229 | 30.83 | 17.04 | 6.81 | 7.22 | 1.03 | 1.21 | 0.38 |
| Home − Away | — | -0.3 | +0.5 | +0.1 | -0.0 | +0.3 | +0.1 | -0.1 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 4 | 7 | 10 | 7.21 | high |
| minutes | 25 | 31.3 | 36.7 | 30.65 | low |
| points | 10 | 16.5 | 24 | 17.31 | medium |
| rebounds | 3 | 6 | 10 | 6.83 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES16835.6% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES7115.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS13228.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-19 | vs PHI | 27 | 25.23 | +7% | 11 | 4/10 | 2/4 | 2/6 | 1/4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | -25.0 | 47% |
| 2026-03-17 | vs SAS | 25 | 25.56 | -2.2% | 5 | 2/6 | 2/3 | 0/3 | 1/2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -27.0 | 36% |
| 2026-03-14 | @ LAC | 37 | 22.25 | +66.3% | 12 | 4/15 | 2/7 | 2/8 | 2/4 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 2 | +14.0 | 36% |
| 2026-03-08 | vs CHI | 35 | 21.5 | +62.8% | 23 | 7/17 | 4/12 | 3/5 | 6/6 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | +10.0 | 59% |
| 2026-03-05 | vs NOP | 34 | 19.08 | +78.2% | 19 | 7/15 | 5/9 | 2/6 | 3/5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | -4.0 | 55% |
| 2026-03-03 | vs PHX | 31 | 16.04 | +93.2% | 16 | 6/14 | 3/8 | 3/6 | 1/2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | -2.0 | 54% |
| 2026-03-01 | @ LAL | 22 | 12.49 | +76.1% | 14 | 6/16 | 5/9 | 1/7 | 1/1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | -12.0 | 43% |
| 2026-02-25 | @ HOU | 25 | 17.42 | +43.5% | 22 | 10/19 | 9/12 | 1/7 | 1/1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | -9.0 | 57% |
| 2026-02-21 | @ SAS | 21 | 17.26 | +21.6% | 7 | 3/9 | 2/5 | 1/4 | 0/0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | -21.0 | 39% |
| 2026-02-19 | vs ORL | 17 | 14.48 | +17.4% | 5 | 2/8 | 1/2 | 1/6 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | -14.0 | 31% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS30.0%18/60 games
10+ REBOUNDS15.0%9/60 games
5+ ASSISTS66.7%40/60 games
2+ THREES55.0%33/60 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
| Season | Team(s) | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | SAC | 60 | 29.1 | 15.1 | 5.5 | 6.7 | 42.6% | 33.5% | 69.0% |
| 2024–25 | DEN | 75 | 27.9 | 13.3 | 4.9 | 6.1 | 44.9% | 32.3% | 66.1% |
| 2023–24 | LAC | 68 | 22.4 | 11.1 | 5.0 | 4.5 | 45.4% | 27.3% | 68.8% |
| 2022–23 | LACLAL | 73 | 29.2 | 15.9 | 5.8 | 7.5 | 43.6% | 31.1% | 65.6% |
| 2021–22 | LAL | 75 | 34.4 | 18.5 | 7.5 | 7.0 | 44.5% | 29.6% | 66.3% |
| 2020–21 | WAS | 65 | 36.4 | 22.2 | 11.5 | 11.7 | 43.9% | 31.5% | 65.6% |
| 2019–20 | HOU | 56 | 36.0 | 27.3 | 8.0 | 7.1 | 47.1% | 26.2% | 76.3% |
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | SAC | 60 | 45.1 | #174 / 409 | 14.7M | Rotation |
| 2024–25 | DEN | 88 | 44.7 | #197 / 422 | 15.1M | Core |
| 2023–24 | LAC | 74 | 45.2 | #169 / 409 | 13.9M | Rotation |
| 2022–23 | LAC | 78 | 46.4 | #150 / 408 | 16.7M | Core |
| 2021–22 | LAL | 75 | 47.4 | #135 / 423 | 19.2M | Core |
| 2020–21 | WAS | 73 | 53.9 | #70 / 410 | 23.9M | Core |
| 2019–20 | HOU | 64 | 53.6 | #60 / 385 | 23.6M | Core |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
No current roster binding for this historical profile
This historical profile is not currently bound to the NBA Official 2026–27 roster product. ProbHoops does not infer a current team from historical data.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2025–26
AF-PLAYER45.1descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#174of 409 ranked
PH$14.7MRotation
SAMPLE60observed games
Ball security24
Box defence41
Creation76
Efficiency28
Rebounding37
Scoring62
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
SAC
Sacramento Kings
EXPECTED MIN23.4
SCORING SHARE13.4%
CREATION SHARE24.2%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR76.5%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.