Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
Philadelphia 76ers current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYER36.52025–26
NBA RANK#311of 409
PH$7.2MDepth · fictional game currencySTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MIN25.6governed role
NEXT GAME@ New York Knicks2026-10-20WHAT IF IMPACT+0.0 ppteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN21.0
PTS8.3
REB2.4
AST2.7
STL0.8
BLK0.2
3PM1.1
FG%41.2%
3P%32.5%
FT%91.3%
+/--2.4
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · Philadelphia 76ers
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED0.39pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G7.2 PTS · 3 REB · 2.4 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G7.7 PTS · 2.8 REB · 2.1 AST
creation→
efficiency→
minutes→
rebounding↑
scoring→
MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS44.5%1738/3903
2-POINT50.8%946/1861
3-POINT38.8%792/2042
FREE THROW85.8%653/761
EFFECTIVE FG%54.7%
TRUE SHOOTING%58.1%
AST / TO2
PTS PER 3612.73rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 246 | 28.68 | 10.26 | 2.66 | 2.15 | 1.65 | 1.18 | 0.36 |
| Away | 238 | 28.82 | 10.07 | 2.49 | 1.98 | 1.62 | 1.06 | 0.4 |
| Home − Away | — | -0.1 | +0.2 | +0.2 | +0.2 | +0.0 | +0.1 | -0.0 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2.07 | high |
| minutes | 24 | 29.5 | 34 | 28.75 | low |
| points | 5 | 10 | 14 | 10.17 | high |
| rebounds | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2.58 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES30.6% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-02 | vs MIN | 19 | — | — | 4 | 2/6 | 2/5 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | -3.0 | 33% |
| 2026-01-31 | vs MIN | 21 | — | — | 12 | 5/10 | 5/7 | 0/3 | 2/3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -12.0 | 53% |
| 2026-01-30 | @ NOP | 25 | — | — | 11 | 4/5 | 4/4 | 0/1 | 3/4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | +4.0 | 81% |
| 2026-01-28 | vs CHA | 21 | — | — | 0 | 0/5 | 0/2 | 0/3 | 0/0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -11.0 | 0% |
| 2026-01-26 | @ HOU | 18 | — | — | 11 | 5/9 | 4/5 | 1/4 | 0/0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +5.0 | 61% |
| 2026-01-23 | vs NOP | 23 | — | — | 4 | 1/9 | 1/3 | 0/6 | 2/2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -8.0 | 20% |
| 2026-01-21 | vs ATL | 18 | — | — | 9 | 3/3 | 2/2 | 1/1 | 2/2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -9.0 | 116% |
| 2026-01-18 | vs ORL | 17 | — | — | 7 | 3/8 | 2/4 | 1/4 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | +6.0 | 44% |
| 2026-01-15 | @ ORL | 14 | — | — | 0 | 0/4 | 0/1 | 0/3 | 0/0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | -13.0 | 0% |
| 2026-01-11 | vs BKN | 20 | — | — | 14 | 5/11 | 3/6 | 2/5 | 2/2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -4.0 | 59% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS2.2%1/46 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/46 games
5+ ASSISTS19.6%9/46 games
2+ THREES32.6%15/46 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
| Season | Team(s) | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | MEM | 46 | 21.0 | 8.3 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 41.2% | 32.5% | 91.3% |
| 2024–25 | ORL | 75 | 29.6 | 8.7 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 43.5% | 34.1% | 85.4% |
| 2023–24 | DEN | 76 | 31.6 | 10.1 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 46.0% | 40.6% | 89.4% |
| 2022–23 | DEN | 76 | 31.4 | 10.8 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 46.2% | 42.3% | 82.4% |
| 2021–22 | WAS | 75 | 30.3 | 13.4 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 43.7% | 39.5% | 88.7% |
| 2020–21 | LAL | 67 | 28.4 | 9.8 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 43.1% | 41.0% | 86.6% |
| 2019–20 | LAL | 69 | 25.5 | 9.3 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 46.8% | 38.5% | 77.5% |
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | MEM | 46 | 36.5 | #311 / 409 | 7.2M | Depth |
| 2024–25 | ORL | 81 | 31.0 | #386 / 422 | 7.8M | Depth |
| 2023–24 | DEN | 88 | 37.3 | #301 / 409 | 10.6M | Rotation |
| 2022–23 | DEN | 96 | 38.9 | #268 / 408 | 12.2M | Rotation |
| 2021–22 | WAS | 75 | 39.2 | #275 / 423 | 11.3M | Rotation |
| 2020–21 | LAL | 73 | 37.4 | #306 / 410 | 9.8M | Depth |
| 2019–20 | LAL | 90 | 36.8 | #271 / 385 | 11M | Rotation |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2025–26
AF-PLAYER36.5descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#311of 409 ranked
PH$7.2MDepth
SAMPLE46observed games
Ball security60
Box defence33
Creation53
Efficiency31
Rebounding17
Scoring36
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE-29.0 ppAF-Player pct − Expected Minutes pct
AF MOVEMENT+15.5 pp2024–25 → 2025–26
ROLE CHANGEEXPANDING+4.6 min vs latest observed MPG
STAR DEPENDENCY12+0.0 pp next-game What If impact
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
MEM
Memphis Grizzlies
EXPECTED MIN18.1
SCORING SHARE7.4%
CREATION SHARE10.1%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR81.4%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.