Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Luke Kennard
Phoenix Suns current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYER49.12025–26
NBA RANK#123of 409
PH$18.1MCore · fictional game currencySTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MIN23.9governed role
NEXT GAME@ Portland Trail Blazers2026-10-21WHAT IF IMPACT+0.2 ppteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN21.4
PTS8.3
REB2.2
AST2.1
STL0.7
BLK0.1
3PM1.5
FG%54.1%
3P%48.3%
FT%92.1%
+/-+0.3
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · Phoenix Suns
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED26.73pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G8.6 PTS · 1 REB · 4 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G11 PTS · 2 REB · 3.2 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G8.4 PTS · 1.8 REB · 2.9 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G8.6 PTS · 1.7 REB · 2.3 AST
creation↑
efficiency→
minutes→
rebounding↓
scoring↑
MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS47.5%1400/2945
2-POINT51.2%568/1110
3-POINT45.3%832/1835
FREE THROW89.9%348/387
EFFECTIVE FG%61.7%
TRUE SHOOTING%63.9%
AST / TO2.56
PTS PER 3615.12rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 195 | 24 | 10.26 | 2.63 | 2.35 | 2.16 | 0.56 | 0.12 |
| Away | 204 | 23.52 | 9.7 | 2.92 | 2.5 | 2.01 | 0.6 | 0.08 |
| Home − Away | — | +0.5 | +0.6 | -0.3 | -0.1 | +0.1 | -0.0 | +0.0 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2.43 | high |
| minutes | 18 | 24 | 30 | 23.75 | medium |
| points | 4 | 9 | 15 | 9.97 | high |
| rebounds | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2.77 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES20.5% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS10.3%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-10 | vs PHX | 28 | 25.37 | +10.4% | 19 | 6/12 | 4/8 | 2/4 | 5/5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +14.0 | 67% |
| 2026-04-09 | @ GSW | 32 | 22.92 | +39.6% | 14 | 6/11 | 5/9 | 1/2 | 1/1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +20.0 | 61% |
| 2026-04-07 | vs OKC | 23 | 23.61 | -2.6% | 10 | 4/7 | 4/5 | 0/2 | 2/3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -23.0 | 60% |
| 2026-04-02 | @ OKC | 33 | 22.25 | +48.3% | 7 | 3/8 | 2/4 | 1/4 | 0/0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -28.0 | 44% |
| 2026-03-31 | vs CLE | 23 | 21.72 | +5.9% | 2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | +4.0 | 50% |
| 2026-03-30 | vs WAS | 23 | 20.68 | +11.2% | 19 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 4/5 | 1/1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | +20.0 | 91% |
| 2026-03-27 | vs BKN | 17 | 21.05 | -19.2% | 5 | 2/4 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -6.0 | 63% |
| 2026-03-25 | @ IND | 28 | 19.7 | +42.1% | 8 | 2/4 | 0/2 | 2/2 | 2/2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | -9.0 | 82% |
| 2026-03-23 | @ DET | 28 | 17.7 | +58.2% | 6 | 1/5 | 0/0 | 1/5 | 3/3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +7.0 | 48% |
| 2026-03-21 | @ ORL | 20 | 17.71 | +12.9% | 13 | 5/7 | 2/3 | 3/4 | 0/0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -6.0 | 93% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS1.3%1/76 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/76 games
5+ ASSISTS10.5%8/76 games
2+ THREES40.8%31/76 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
| Season | Team(s) | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | LALATL | 76 | 21.4 | 8.3 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 54.1% | 48.3% | 92.1% |
| 2024–25 | MEM | 64 | 22.8 | 9.0 | 2.8 | 3.3 | 48.1% | 43.8% | 89.5% |
| 2023–24 | MEM | 39 | 25.6 | 11.0 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 44.8% | 45.0% | 88.9% |
| 2022–23 | MEMLAC | 59 | 22.3 | 9.3 | 2.7 | 1.5 | 49.2% | 49.4% | 94.9% |
| 2021–22 | LAC | 70 | 27.4 | 11.9 | 3.3 | 2.1 | 44.9% | 44.9% | 89.6% |
| 2020–21 | LAC | 63 | 19.6 | 8.3 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 47.6% | 44.6% | 83.9% |
| 2019–20 | DET | 28 | 32.9 | 15.8 | 3.5 | 4.1 | 44.1% | 39.9% | 89.3% |
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | LAL | 86 | 49.1 | #123 / 409 | 18.1M | Core |
| 2024–25 | MEM | 69 | 50.4 | #120 / 422 | 16.7M | Core |
| 2023–24 | MEM | 39 | 48.5 | #136 / 409 | 13.7M | Rotation |
| 2022–23 | MEM | 64 | 47.6 | #129 / 408 | 15.1M | Core |
| 2021–22 | LAC | 70 | 45.8 | #166 / 423 | 15.5M | Core |
| 2020–21 | LAC | 89 | 42.8 | #208 / 410 | 12M | Rotation |
| 2019–20 | DET | 28 | 46.7 | #128 / 385 | 13.4M | Rotation |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2025–26
AF-PLAYER49.1descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#123of 409 ranked
PH$18.1MCore
SAMPLE86observed games
Ball security71
Box defence22
Creation47
Efficiency84
Rebounding10
Scoring26
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE+21.1 ppAF-Player pct − Expected Minutes pct
AF MOVEMENT-1.6 pp2024–25 → 2025–26
ROLE CHANGESTABLE+1.2 min vs latest observed MPG
STAR DEPENDENCY45+0.2 pp next-game What If impact
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
LAL
Los Angeles Lakers
EXPECTED MIN24.3
SCORING SHARE8.8%
CREATION SHARE8.4%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR86.2%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.
ATL
Atlanta Hawks
EXPECTED MIN16.3
SCORING SHARE6.6%
CREATION SHARE6.9%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR73.8%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.