CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE

Christian Koloko

New Orleans Pelicans current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.

New Orleans Pelicans · current teamC

AF-PLAYER28.72025–26

NBA RANK#386of 409

PH$5.3MDepth · fictional game currency

STATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status

EXPECTED MIN0.0governed role

NEXT GAMEvs Indiana Pacers2026-10-21 WHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual

REGULAR-SEASON GAMES120

Player-safe accepted corpus.

CAREER PPG · CORPUS2.8

2019–20 through 2025–26 window.

CAREER RPG · CORPUS2.9

Historical window, not full NBA career.

CAREER APG · CORPUS0.5

Historical window, not full NBA career.

LATEST COMPLETED SEASON

2025–26

26 games

MIN13.6

PTS2.6

REB3.1

AST0.7

STL0.5

BLK0.9

3PM0.0

FG%40.3%

3P%11.1%

FT%64.3%

+/--0.7

NEXT GAME

Current context

2026–27 · New Orleans Pelicans

Assigned schedule

NBA Official roster

2026-10-21 · HOMEvs Indiana Pacers57.7% winProjected 113–116

2026-10-23 · AWAY@ Utah Jazz47.4% winProjected 115–116

2026-10-24 · AWAY@ Denver Nuggets32.7% winProjected 113–118

2026-10-28 · HOMEvs Denver Nuggets46.1% winProjected 115–115

2026-10-29 · HOMEvs Sacramento Kings60.7% winProjected 113–117

E66 · PLAYER PROJECTION

Loading next-game projection…

PTS / REB / AST / 3PM use a separately validated player-stat model. Game Win, projected team score, Form and milestones keep their own authorities.

Current team Open Player What If

MINUTES + FORM

Role-adjusted performance

CURRENT FORM · 2026–27

Waiting for completed player boxscores

PRESEASON / NO SAMPLE

ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.

LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26

Historical Minutes Intelligence

DESCRIPTIVE · NOT CURRENT

Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.

LATEST ACTUAL21minutes

EXPECTED0.76pregame reference

DEVIATION+2645.5%expanded minutes

LAST 5

ALL OBSERVED5 G0.8 PTS · 1.6 REB · 0.2 AST

ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G1.2 PTS · 4.4 REB · 1 AST

LAST 10

ALL OBSERVED10 G0.4 PTS · 0.8 REB · 0.3 AST

ROLE-CONSISTENT8 G1.5 PTS · 4.38 REB · 1 AST

creation→

efficiency↓

minutes→

rebounding→

scoring↓

MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.

SPLITS + EFFICIENCY

How the production is built

EFFICIENCY

Shooting, derived from the box score

CAREER · 120 GAMES

2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.

FIELD GOALS49.0%141/288

2-POINT52.8%139/263

3-POINT8.0%2/25

FREE THROW64.4%56/87

EFFECTIVE FG%49.3%

TRUE SHOOTING%52.1%

AST / TO1.35

PTS PER 368.17rate, not projection

HOME / AWAY

Where the games were played

61 HOME · 59 AWAY

Split	G	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	3PM	STL	BLK
Home	61	13.23	3.3	2.97	0.67	0.02	0.39	0.82
Away	59	11.73	2.36	2.75	0.41	0.02	0.32	0.78
Home − Away	—	+1.5	+0.9	+0.2	+0.3	0.0	+0.1	+0.0

Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.

CONSISTENCY

What the average hides

120 GAMES

Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.

Category	Floor	Median	Ceiling	Mean	Volatility
assists	0	0	1	0.54	high
minutes	6	12	19.2	12.49	high
points	0	2	4	2.83	high
rebounds	1	2	4.2	2.86	high

Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.

DOUBLE-DOUBLES

Observed frequency across the corpus

120 GAMES

DOUBLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games

TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games

10+ ASSISTS00.0%

10+ BLOCKS00.0%

Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.

GAME LOG · 2025–26

One log, the window you choose

10 games

Date	Opp	MIN	EXP MIN	MIN Δ	PTS	FG	2P	3P	FT	OR	DR	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	+/-	TS%
2026-04-12	@ MIA	21	0.76	+2645.5%	4	1/5	1/3	0/2	2/4	3	5	8	1	0	1	3	4	-17.0	30%
2026-03-28	vs SAC	11	1.41	+678.4%	0	0/2	0/2	0/0	0/0	0	0	0	2	1	1	0	0	-15.0	0%
2026-03-23	vs MEM	7	0.61	+1038.4%	2	1/3	1/1	0/2	0/0	0	1	1	1	0	0	0	1	+4.0	33%
2026-03-14	vs MIL	3	0.48	+527.2%	2	1/1	1/1	0/0	0/0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0.0	100%
2026-03-04	@ MIL	2	0.58	+242.5%	0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0	1	1	0	1	1	0	0	-2.0	—
2026-02-26	vs WAS	3	0.83	+262.6%	4	0/1	0/1	0/0	4/4	2	2	4	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	73%
2026-02-03	@ MIA	11	—	—	2	0/3	0/2	0/1	2/2	1	1	2	0	0	0	1	3	-1.0	26%
2026-01-31	@ IND	16	—	—	0	0/3	0/3	0/0	0/0	1	3	4	0	0	0	0	2	-9.0	0%
2026-01-29	vs HOU	26	—	—	6	3/7	3/5	0/2	0/0	3	4	7	2	1	1	1	4	-13.0	43%
2026-01-28	@ BOS	13	—	—	0	0/1	0/1	0/0	0/0	1	1	2	1	0	0	0	3	+14.0	0%

All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.

HISTORY

Season and milestone evidence

DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26

How often did the threshold occur?

historical frequency

These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.

20+ POINTS0.0%0/26 games

10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/26 games

5+ ASSISTS0.0%0/26 games

2+ THREES0.0%0/26 games

SEASON HISTORY

Regular-season production

accepted player-safe games

Season	Team(s)	G	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	FG%	3P%	FT%
2025–26	MEM LAL ATL	26	13.6	2.6	3.1	0.7	40.3%	11.1%	64.3%
2024–25	LAL	36	9.5	2.5	2.6	0.4	60.6%	0.0%	71.4%
2022–23	TOR	58	13.8	3.1	3.0	0.5	48.0%	8.3%	62.7%

AF-PLAYER HISTORY

Season by season

Season	Team	G	AF-Player	Rank	PH$	Band
2025–26	ATL	26	28.7	#386 / 409	5.3M	Depth
2024–25	LAL	37	45.5	#183 / 422	9.6M	Depth
2022–23	TOR	58	33.0	#342 / 408	6.2M	Depth

PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.

CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY

Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.

governed identity

Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.

Open team profile

IMPACT

Rating and role context

AF-PLAYER

Measured production, 2025–26

#386 OF 409

AF-PLAYER28.7descriptive index, not a win probability

NBA RANK#386of 409 ranked

PH$5.3MDepth

SAMPLE26observed games

Ball security

Box defence

Creation

Efficiency

Rebounding

Scoring

PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.

E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE

Distinct signals, side by side

descriptive · current role + historical rating

Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.

VALUE OVER ROLE—requires eligible AF-Player + governed role

AF MOVEMENT-51.1 pp2024–25 → 2025–26

ROLE CHANGECONTRACTING-13.6 min vs latest observed MPG

STAR DEPENDENCY—governed What If sample unavailable

DECLINING

Player movement Opportunities Compare players

Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.

PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26

Pregame role and with/without context

descriptive · not causal

Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.

MEM

Memphis Grizzlies

EXPECTED MIN11.0

SCORING SHARE2.1%

CREATION SHARE3.2%

PARTICIPATION PRIOR66.8%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.

LAL

Los Angeles Lakers

EXPECTED MIN1.3

SCORING SHARE0.0%

CREATION SHARE0.0%

PARTICIPATION PRIOR44.4%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.

ATL

Atlanta Hawks

EXPECTED MIN4.3

SCORING SHARE2.9%

CREATION SHARE2.1%

PARTICIPATION PRIOR41.4%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.