Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Luke Kornet
San Antonio Spurs current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYER63.02025–26
NBA RANK#9of 409
PH$25.3MHigh Value · fictional game currencySTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MIN10.6governed role
NEXT GAMEvs Oklahoma City Thunder2026-10-20WHAT IF IMPACT-0.7 ppteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN20.9
PTS6.6
REB6.1
AST1.9
STL0.5
BLK1.0
3PM0.0
FG%63.8%
3P%—
FT%82.7%
+/-+1.5
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · San Antonio Spurs
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED16.77pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G4 PTS · 2.6 REB · 1.6 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G4 PTS · 5 REB · 1 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G4 PTS · 2.5 REB · 1.4 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G3.8 PTS · 4 REB · 1.8 AST
creation↓
efficiency↓
minutes→
rebounding→
scoring→
MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS61.1%742/1215
2-POINT67.1%692/1031
3-POINT27.2%50/184
FREE THROW78.7%263/334
EFFECTIVE FG%63.1%
TRUE SHOOTING%66.0%
AST / TO3.35
PTS PER 3611.8rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 169 | 15.43 | 5.04 | 3.95 | 1.25 | 0.14 | 0.33 | 0.88 |
| Away | 179 | 16.05 | 5.28 | 4.18 | 1.16 | 0.15 | 0.35 | 0.85 |
| Home − Away | — | -0.6 | -0.2 | -0.2 | +0.1 | -0.0 | -0.0 | +0.0 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1.2 | high |
| minutes | 8 | 16 | 23 | 15.75 | high |
| points | 1 | 4 | 9 | 5.16 | high |
| rebounds | 1 | 4 | 7 | 4.07 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES72.0% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-08 | vs POR | 26 | 15.5 | +67.7% | 10 | 5/6 | 5/6 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +5.0 | 83% |
| 2026-04-06 | vs PHI | 22 | 15.29 | +43.9% | 10 | 4/6 | 4/6 | 0/0 | 2/2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | +7.0 | 73% |
| 2026-04-04 | @ DEN | 13 | 13.53 | -3.9% | 0 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -6.0 | 0% |
| 2026-04-02 | @ LAC | 25 | 12.58 | +98.7% | 8 | 2/3 | 2/3 | 0/0 | 4/4 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +14.0 | 84% |
| 2026-03-30 | vs CHI | 19 | 15.36 | +23.7% | 10 | 4/5 | 4/5 | 0/0 | 2/2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -8.0 | 85% |
| 2026-03-28 | @ MIL | 21 | 14.81 | +41.8% | 2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +19.0 | 50% |
| 2026-03-23 | @ MIA | 19 | 15.29 | +24.2% | 5 | 1/4 | 1/4 | 0/0 | 3/4 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +12.0 | 43% |
| 2026-03-21 | vs IND | 22 | 15.3 | +43.8% | 9 | 4/6 | 4/6 | 0/0 | 1/2 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | +2.0 | 65% |
| 2026-03-19 | vs PHX | 15 | 14.65 | +2.4% | 1 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/0 | 1/2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -18.0 | 17% |
| 2026-03-17 | @ SAC | 19 | 14.03 | +35.4% | 4 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 2/2 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | +6.0 | 69% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS3.0%2/66 games
10+ REBOUNDS9.1%6/66 games
5+ ASSISTS3.0%2/66 games
2+ THREES0.0%0/66 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
| Season | Team(s) | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | SAS | 66 | 20.9 | 6.6 | 6.1 | 1.9 | 63.8% | — | 82.7% |
| 2024–25 | BOS | 70 | 18.8 | 6.0 | 5.4 | 1.6 | 67.5% | 0.0% | 70.3% |
| 2023–24 | BOS | 63 | 15.7 | 5.3 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 70.0% | 100.0% | 90.7% |
| 2022–23 | BOS | 69 | 11.7 | 3.8 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 66.5% | 23.1% | 82.0% |
| 2021–22 | CLEMILBOS | 15 | 6.9 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 48.1% | 0.0% | 66.7% |
| 2020–21 | CHIBOS | 31 | 11.2 | 3.4 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 43.6% | 25.4% | 50.0% |
| 2019–20 | CHI | 34 | 15.8 | 6.2 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 44.2% | 29.8% | 71.4% |
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | SAS | 89 | 63.0 | #9 / 409 | 25.3M | High Value |
| 2024–25 | BOS | 82 | 62.8 | #17 / 422 | 22.9M | Core |
| 2023–24 | BOS | 76 | 59.6 | #29 / 409 | 20.6M | Core |
| 2022–23 | BOS | 77 | 55.4 | #49 / 408 | 17.3M | Core |
| 2020–21 | BOS | 74 | 38.4 | #293 / 410 | 6.6M | Depth |
| 2019–20 | CHI | 49 | 40.5 | #218 / 385 | 8.6M | Depth |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2025–26
AF-PLAYER63.0descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#9of 409 ranked
PH$25.3MHigh Value
SAMPLE89observed games
Ball security74
Box defence51
Creation51
Efficiency90
Rebounding83
Scoring14
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE+79.8 ppAF-Player pct − Expected Minutes pct
AF MOVEMENT+1.8 pp2024–25 → 2025–26
ROLE CHANGECONTRACTING-8.4 min vs latest observed MPG
STAR DEPENDENCY78-0.7 pp next-game What If impact
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
SAS
San Antonio Spurs
EXPECTED MIN16.7
SCORING SHARE5.4%
CREATION SHARE6.9%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR76.3%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.