Player-safe accepted corpus.
PLAYER PROFILE · HISTORICAL
Joe Ingles
Accepted historical regular-season production. No current 2026–27 roster status is inferred.
AF-PLAYER41.52023–24
NBA RANK#227of 409
PH$10.5MRotation · fictional game currencySTATUSHistoricalno current binding
EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported
NEXT GAMENo assigned gameSchedule pendingWHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN7.0
PTS1.6
REB0.9
AST1.6
STL0.5
BLK0.1
3PM0.3
FG%54.5%
3P%42.9%
FT%100.0%
+/--1.1
NEXT GAME
Current context
No current roster binding is published for this historical profile. ProbHoops does not infer a current team, availability or expected minutes from historical data.
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
Current form is unavailable because this historical profile is not bound to the governed 2026–27 roster. No current role is inferred.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL32minutes
EXPECTED3.42pregame reference
DEVIATION+836%expanded minutes
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G4.4 PTS · 2 REB · 2.8 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT0 G— PTS · — REB · — AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G2.2 PTS · 1 REB · 1.4 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT0 G— PTS · — REB · — AST
creation—
efficiency—
minutes—
rebounding—
scoring—
Form label withheld: insufficient role-consistent sample. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS44.8%858/1914
2-POINT54.7%297/543
3-POINT40.9%561/1371
FREE THROW81.8%215/263
EFFECTIVE FG%59.5%
TRUE SHOOTING%61.4%
AST / TO2.82
PTS PER 3611.86rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 172 | 22.51 | 7.43 | 2.93 | 3.81 | 1.67 | 0.62 | 0.14 |
| Away | 160 | 23.06 | 7.59 | 2.79 | 3.76 | 1.71 | 0.7 | 0.1 |
| Home − Away | — | -0.6 | -0.2 | +0.1 | +0.1 | -0.0 | -0.1 | +0.0 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 2 | 3 | 6 | 3.78 | high |
| minutes | 16 | 24.2 | 30.3 | 22.78 | medium |
| points | 2 | 6 | 13 | 7.51 | high |
| rebounds | 1 | 3 | 5 | 2.86 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES72.1% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS82.4%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-12 | vs NOP | 32 | 3.42 | +836% | 15 | 6/10 | 3/4 | 3/6 | 0/0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | -8.0 | 75% |
| 2026-04-08 | @ ORL | 18 | 0.72 | +2393.3% | 7 | 3/4 | 2/2 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 88% |
| 2026-03-28 | vs DET | 4 | 0.47 | +742.4% | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.0 | — |
| 2026-03-15 | @ OKC | 2 | 0.94 | +113% | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +3.0 | — |
| 2026-03-10 | @ LAL | 4 | 0.33 | +1124% | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +5.0 | — |
| 2026-02-22 | vs PHI | 4 | 1.31 | +206.2% | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2.0 | — |
| 2026-02-11 | vs POR | 4 | 1.16 | +244.7% | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +2.0 | — |
| 2026-02-08 | vs LAC | 4 | 0.91 | +340.7% | 0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +6.0 | 0% |
| 2026-01-29 | vs OKC | 3 | — | — | 0 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -10.0 | 0% |
| 2026-01-26 | vs GSW | 5 | — | — | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -4.0 | — |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS0.0%0/20 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/20 games
5+ ASSISTS5.0%1/20 games
2+ THREES5.0%1/20 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
| Season | Team(s) | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | MIN | 20 | 7.0 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 54.5% | 42.9% | 100.0% |
| 2024–25 | MIN | 15 | 7.7 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 26.1% | 20.0% | — |
| 2023–24 | ORL | 68 | 17.1 | 4.3 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 43.6% | 43.5% | 82.3% |
| 2022–23 | MIL | 46 | 22.6 | 6.9 | 2.8 | 3.3 | 43.5% | 40.9% | 85.7% |
| 2021–22 | UTA | 44 | 25.0 | 7.2 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 40.1% | 34.3% | 77.3% |
| 2020–21 | UTA | 67 | 27.9 | 12.1 | 3.6 | 4.8 | 48.9% | 45.1% | 84.4% |
| 2019–20 | UTA | 72 | 29.7 | 9.8 | 3.9 | 5.2 | 44.5% | 39.9% | 78.7% |
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023–24 | ORL | 75 | 41.5 | #227 / 409 | 10.5M | Rotation |
| 2022–23 | MIL | 51 | 42.7 | #205 / 408 | 10.7M | Rotation |
| 2021–22 | UTA | 44 | 36.7 | #317 / 423 | 7.7M | Depth |
| 2020–21 | UTA | 78 | 54.3 | #66 / 410 | 23.2M | Core |
| 2019–20 | UTA | 79 | 42.8 | #185 / 385 | 15.4M | Core |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
No current roster binding for this historical profile
This historical profile is not currently bound to the NBA Official 2026–27 roster product. ProbHoops does not infer a current team from historical data.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2023–24
AF-PLAYER41.5descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#227of 409 ranked
PH$10.5MRotation
SAMPLE75observed games
Ball security24
Box defence29
Creation79
Efficiency59
Rebounding15
Scoring7
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
MIN
Minnesota Timberwolves
EXPECTED MIN2.1
SCORING SHARE0.7%
CREATION SHARE4.7%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR35.2%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.