Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Javonte Green
Detroit Pistons current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYER40.32025–26
NBA RANK#245of 409
PH$10.2MRotation · fictional game currencySTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MIN0.0governed role
NEXT GAMEvs Boston Celtics2026-10-20WHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN17.0
PTS6.6
REB2.6
AST0.6
STL1.3
BLK0.3
3PM1.1
FG%44.4%
3P%37.6%
FT%85.7%
+/-+2.2
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · Detroit Pistons
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED16.27pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G5 PTS · 1.8 REB · 0.4 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G6.6 PTS · 3 REB · 1 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G5.8 PTS · 2.5 REB · 0.5 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G7.7 PTS · 3.3 REB · 0.7 AST
creation↑
efficiency↑
minutes→
rebounding↑
scoring→
HOT historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS49.3%662/1343
2-POINT59.3%462/779
3-POINT35.5%200/564
FREE THROW77.0%311/404
EFFECTIVE FG%56.7%
TRUE SHOOTING%60.3%
AST / TO1.39
PTS PER 3611.9rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 161 | 16.8 | 6.12 | 2.96 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.99 | 0.37 |
| Away | 167 | 17.05 | 5.09 | 3.05 | 0.71 | 0.57 | 0.86 | 0.38 |
| Home − Away | — | -0.3 | +1.0 | -0.1 | -0.0 | +0.1 | +0.1 | -0.0 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.69 | high |
| minutes | 9 | 17 | 24.8 | 16.93 | high |
| points | 2 | 5 | 9 | 5.59 | high |
| rebounds | 1 | 3 | 5 | 3.01 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES10.3% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-10 | @ CHA | 15 | 17.69 | -15.2% | 6 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 1/1 | 3/3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +15.0 | 129% |
| 2026-04-06 | @ ORL | 27 | 15.33 | +76.2% | 17 | 6/13 | 3/5 | 3/8 | 2/3 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | +5.0 | 59% |
| 2026-04-04 | @ PHI | 6 | 16.53 | -63.7% | 2 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -9.0 | 50% |
| 2026-04-02 | vs MIN | 27 | 14.8 | +82.5% | 8 | 2/7 | 0/2 | 2/5 | 2/2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | +3.0 | 51% |
| 2026-03-31 | vs TOR | 6 | 17.11 | -64.9% | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.0 | — |
| 2026-03-30 | @ OKC | 30 | 13.9 | +115.9% | 19 | 6/12 | 1/1 | 5/11 | 2/2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | +5.0 | 74% |
| 2026-03-28 | @ MIN | 14 | 13.05 | +7.3% | 6 | 2/4 | 0/0 | 2/4 | 0/0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +7.0 | 75% |
| 2026-03-25 | vs ATL | 15 | 13.12 | +14.4% | 7 | 3/8 | 2/3 | 1/5 | 0/0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +4.0 | 44% |
| 2026-03-23 | vs LAL | 15 | 13.71 | +9.4% | 6 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 4/4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +14.0 | 109% |
| 2026-03-20 | vs GSW | 20 | 13.52 | +47.9% | 5 | 2/3 | 1/1 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -14.0 | 83% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS1.4%1/70 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/70 games
5+ ASSISTS0.0%0/70 games
2+ THREES24.3%17/70 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
| Season | Team(s) | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | DET | 70 | 17.0 | 6.6 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 44.4% | 37.6% | 85.7% |
| 2024–25 | CLENOP | 65 | 18.9 | 5.2 | 3.3 | 0.8 | 43.2% | 34.3% | 72.4% |
| 2023–24 | CHI | 9 | 25.7 | 12.2 | 7.4 | 0.6 | 60.0% | 37.0% | 76.9% |
| 2022–23 | CHI | 32 | 15.1 | 5.2 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 56.5% | 37.1% | 66.7% |
| 2021–22 | CHI | 64 | 23.2 | 7.0 | 4.3 | 0.9 | 53.6% | 35.0% | 82.2% |
| 2020–21 | CHIBOS | 41 | 11.6 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 52.0% | 33.3% | 75.0% |
| 2019–20 | BOS | 47 | 9.8 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 50.0% | 27.3% | 66.7% |
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | DET | 81 | 40.3 | #245 / 409 | 10.2M | Rotation |
| 2024–25 | CLE | 71 | 34.8 | #347 / 422 | 7.1M | Depth |
| 2022–23 | CHI | 32 | 49.7 | #103 / 408 | 13.1M | Rotation |
| 2021–22 | CHI | 69 | 44.3 | #187 / 423 | 13.5M | Rotation |
| 2020–21 | CHI | 68 | 41.1 | #245 / 410 | 7.9M | Depth |
| 2019–20 | BOS | 72 | 40.0 | #225 / 385 | 8.2M | Depth |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2025–26
AF-PLAYER40.3descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#245of 409 ranked
PH$10.2MRotation
SAMPLE81observed games
Ball security81
Box defence58
Creation11
Efficiency54
Rebounding27
Scoring27
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE—requires eligible AF-Player + governed role
AF MOVEMENT+22.4 pp2024–25 → 2025–26
ROLE CHANGECONTRACTING-16.3 min vs latest observed MPG
STAR DEPENDENCY—governed What If sample unavailable
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
DET
Detroit Pistons
EXPECTED MIN15.9
SCORING SHARE5.3%
CREATION SHARE2.2%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR87.1%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.