Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Donte DiVincenzo
Minnesota Timberwolves current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYER42.62025–26
NBA RANK#208of 409
PH$14.6MRotation · fictional game currencySTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MIN0.0governed role
NEXT GAME@ Miami Heat2026-10-21WHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN30.6
PTS12.3
REB4.1
AST3.8
STL1.3
BLK0.4
3PM3.0
FG%40.6%
3P%37.6%
FT%74.8%
+/-+3.7
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · Minnesota Timberwolves
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL8minutes
EXPECTED27.5pregame reference
DEVIATION-70.9%low minutes deviation
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G7.8 PTS · 1.2 REB · 2 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G12.4 PTS · 1.8 REB · 1.8 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G9.4 PTS · 1.3 REB · 1.6 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G11.6 PTS · 2.8 REB · 1.9 AST
creation↓
efficiency↓
minutes→
rebounding↓
scoring→
COLD historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS42.4%1840/4343
2-POINT50.9%726/1427
3-POINT38.2%1114/2916
FREE THROW76.8%454/591
EFFECTIVE FG%55.2%
TRUE SHOOTING%57.0%
AST / TO2.13
PTS PER 3615.16rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 231 | 27.04 | 11.35 | 4.32 | 3.28 | 2.42 | 1.11 | 0.31 |
| Away | 231 | 26.92 | 11.36 | 4.41 | 3.01 | 2.4 | 1.39 | 0.29 |
| Home − Away | — | +0.1 | -0.0 | -0.1 | +0.3 | +0.0 | -0.3 | +0.0 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 1 | 3 | 5 | 3.15 | high |
| minutes | 21 | 27 | 32 | 26.98 | low |
| points | 5 | 11 | 16.8 | 11.36 | high |
| rebounds | 2 | 4 | 6 | 4.37 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES122.6% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS10.2%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-12 | vs NOP | 8 | 27.5 | -70.9% | 3 | 1/5 | 0/0 | 1/5 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +1.0 | 30% |
| 2026-04-10 | @ HOU | 29 | 28.08 | +3.3% | 18 | 6/12 | 3/4 | 3/8 | 3/6 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | +1.0 | 62% |
| 2026-04-08 | @ ORL | 21 | 30.22 | -30.5% | 12 | 4/7 | 0/0 | 4/7 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | -15.0 | 86% |
| 2026-04-05 | vs CHA | 27 | 30.96 | -12.8% | 6 | 2/9 | 0/1 | 2/8 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | -11.0 | 33% |
| 2026-04-03 | @ PHI | 29 | 31.83 | -8.9% | 11 | 3/11 | 0/2 | 3/9 | 2/3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -18.0 | 45% |
| 2026-04-02 | @ DET | 30 | 31.78 | -5.6% | 5 | 2/8 | 1/1 | 1/7 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -8.0 | 31% |
| 2026-03-28 | vs DET | 33 | 30.87 | +6.9% | 22 | 7/18 | 2/4 | 5/14 | 3/4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -8.0 | 56% |
| 2026-03-25 | vs HOU | 36 | 30.35 | +18.6% | 17 | 6/15 | 1/3 | 5/12 | 0/0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | +3.0 | 57% |
| 2026-03-22 | @ BOS | 31 | 30.26 | +2.4% | 8 | 3/9 | 1/2 | 2/7 | 0/0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +5.0 | 44% |
| 2026-03-20 | vs POR | 35 | 29.37 | +19.2% | 13 | 5/16 | 2/4 | 3/12 | 0/0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | -14.0 | 41% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS10.3%8/78 games
10+ REBOUNDS1.3%1/78 games
5+ ASSISTS30.8%24/78 games
2+ THREES76.9%60/78 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
| Season | Team(s) | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | MIN | 78 | 30.6 | 12.3 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 40.6% | 37.6% | 74.8% |
| 2024–25 | MIN | 58 | 26.1 | 11.6 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 41.9% | 39.6% | 77.8% |
| 2023–24 | NYK | 81 | 29.2 | 15.5 | 3.7 | 2.7 | 44.3% | 40.1% | 75.4% |
| 2022–23 | GSW | 72 | 26.3 | 9.4 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 43.5% | 39.7% | 81.7% |
| 2021–22 | MILSAC | 42 | 23.9 | 9.1 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 35.1% | 33.9% | 84.3% |
| 2020–21 | MIL | 65 | 27.4 | 10.6 | 5.7 | 3.1 | 42.3% | 38.1% | 71.8% |
| 2019–20 | MIL | 66 | 23.0 | 9.2 | 4.8 | 2.3 | 45.5% | 33.6% | 73.3% |
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | MIN | 82 | 42.6 | #208 / 409 | 14.6M | Rotation |
| 2024–25 | MIN | 73 | 41.9 | #235 / 422 | 12.1M | Rotation |
| 2023–24 | NYK | 94 | 47.2 | #148 / 409 | 18.3M | Core |
| 2022–23 | GSW | 85 | 42.8 | #202 / 408 | 13.3M | Rotation |
| 2021–22 | SAC | 42 | 36.5 | #320 / 423 | 7.5M | Depth |
| 2020–21 | MIL | 69 | 41.2 | #240 / 410 | 11.9M | Rotation |
| 2019–20 | MIL | 80 | 43.1 | #182 / 385 | 13.4M | Rotation |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2025–26
AF-PLAYER42.6descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#208of 409 ranked
PH$14.6MRotation
SAMPLE82observed games
Ball security62
Box defence40
Creation58
Efficiency45
Rebounding19
Scoring34
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE—requires eligible AF-Player + governed role
AF MOVEMENT+4.8 pp2024–25 → 2025–26
ROLE CHANGECONTRACTING-30.3 min vs latest observed MPG
STAR DEPENDENCY—governed What If sample unavailable
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
MIN
Minnesota Timberwolves
EXPECTED MIN28.2
SCORING SHARE10.5%
CREATION SHARE14.4%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR85.1%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.