Player-safe accepted corpus.
PLAYER PROFILE · HISTORICAL
Cole Swider
Accepted historical regular-season production. No current 2026–27 roster status is inferred.
AF-PLAYERPendingsample gate
NBA RANK—not ranked
PH$—pending · how PH$ worksSTATUSHistoricalno current binding
EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported
NEXT GAMENo assigned gameSchedule pendingWHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2024–25
MIN15.8
PTS5.4
REB2.5
AST0.3
STL0.5
BLK0.1
3PM1.4
FG%33.3%
3P%29.7%
FT%0.0%
+/-+2.3
NEXT GAME
Current context
No current roster binding is published for this historical profile. ProbHoops does not infer a current team, availability or expected minutes from historical data.
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
Current form is unavailable because this historical profile is not bound to the governed 2026–27 roster. No current role is inferred.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2024–25
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED14.96pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G4.4 PTS · 2.6 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT4 G6 PTS · 1.75 REB · 0.25 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G4.3 PTS · 1.8 REB · 0.1 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT4 G6 PTS · 1.75 REB · 0.25 AST
creation—
efficiency—
minutes—
rebounding—
scoring—
Form label withheld: insufficient role-consistent sample. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS35.8%34/95
2-POINT50.0%10/20
3-POINT32.0%24/75
FREE THROW—2/3
EFFECTIVE FG%48.4%
TRUE SHOOTING%48.8%
AST / TO1
PTS PER 3613.32rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 15 | 6.67 | 2.33 | 0.6 | 0.07 | 0.6 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| Away | 18 | 8.56 | 3.28 | 1.39 | 0.56 | 0.83 | 0.22 | 0.06 |
| Home − Away | — | -1.9 | -0.9 | -0.8 | -0.5 | -0.2 | -0.1 | +0.0 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.33 | high |
| minutes | 1.4 | 4 | 17.4 | 7.7 | high |
| points | 0 | 0 | 5.6 | 2.85 | high |
| rebounds | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.03 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2024–25
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-06 | @ BKN | 24 | 16.81 | +42.8% | 12 | 4/7 | 0/1 | 4/6 | 0/0 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | +9.0 | 86% |
| 2025-04-04 | vs DET | 15 | 17.1 | -12.3% | 10 | 4/8 | 2/4 | 2/4 | 0/0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +2.0 | 63% |
| 2025-04-03 | vs POR | 14 | 17.94 | -22% | 0 | 0/8 | 0/2 | 0/6 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | -16.0 | 0% |
| 2025-04-01 | @ CHI | 21 | 16.85 | +24.6% | 9 | 3/8 | 0/0 | 3/8 | 0/0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -7.0 | 56% |
| 2025-03-28 | vs CHA | 19 | 16.44 | +15.5% | 5 | 2/5 | 1/1 | 1/4 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | +7.0 | 50% |
| 2025-03-26 | @ BKN | 20 | — | — | 7 | 3/7 | 2/3 | 1/4 | 0/1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | +13.0 | 47% |
| 2024-11-27 | @ MEM | 9 | 1.92 | +369.6% | 0 | 0/4 | 0/0 | 0/4 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +4.0 | 0% |
| 2024-11-23 | @ ORL | 4 | — | — | 0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +6.0 | 0% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2024–25
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS0.0%0/8 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/8 games
5+ ASSISTS0.0%0/8 games
2+ THREES37.5%3/8 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
No current roster binding for this historical profile
This historical profile is not currently bound to the NBA Official 2026–27 roster product. ProbHoops does not infer a current team from historical data.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2024–25
ProbHoops has observed 8 games of this player in 2024–25 — below the sample floor required to rank. He carries no AF-Player and no PH$. Pending means not enough observation, never a low score.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2024–25
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
DET
Detroit Pistons
EXPECTED MIN1.8
SCORING SHARE0.0%
CREATION SHARE1.7%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR38.7%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.
TOR
Toronto Raptors
EXPECTED MIN16.9
SCORING SHARE5.7%
CREATION SHARE0.4%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR75.1%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.