Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Tristen Newton
Houston Rockets current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYERPendingsample gate
NBA RANK—not ranked
PH$—pending · how PH$ worksSTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported
NEXT GAMEvs Dallas Mavericks2026-10-21WHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2024–25
MIN2.3
PTS0.4
REB0.6
AST0.3
STL0.1
BLK0.0
3PM0.0
FG%12.5%
3P%0.0%
FT%100.0%
+/--0.7
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · Houston Rockets
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2024–25
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED0.26pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT0 G— PTS · — REB · — AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G0 PTS · 0.3 REB · 0.1 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT0 G— PTS · — REB · — AST
creation—
efficiency—
minutes—
rebounding—
scoring—
Form label withheld: insufficient role-consistent sample. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS—1/8
2-POINT—1/5
3-POINT—0/3
FREE THROW—1/1
EFFECTIVE FG%—
TRUE SHOOTING%—
AST / TO1
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
Not enough games on both sides to publish a split. ProbHoops requires at least 5 home and 5 away games; this player has 2 and 5.
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
A distribution needs at least 10 observed games. This player has 7.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2024–25
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-13 | vs OKC | 2 | 1.02 | +96.3% | 0 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -4.0 | 0% |
| 2025-02-10 | @ CLE | 5 | — | — | 0 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +5.0 | 0% |
| 2025-01-13 | @ WAS | 1 | — | — | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -3.0 | — |
| 2024-12-01 | @ MEM | 2 | 0.99 | +101% | 0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +2.0 | 0% |
| 2024-11-29 | vs DET | 3 | 0.49 | +511.3% | 0 | 0/2 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -5.0 | 0% |
| 2024-11-22 | @ MIL | 2 | 0.51 | +294.1% | 3 | 1/2 | 1/1 | 0/1 | 1/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1.0 | 62% |
| 2024-11-18 | @ TOR | 1 | — | — | 0 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.0 | 0% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2024–25
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS0.0%0/7 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/7 games
5+ ASSISTS0.0%0/7 games
2+ THREES0.0%0/7 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2024–25
ProbHoops has observed 9 games of this player in 2024–25 — below the sample floor required to rank. He carries no AF-Player and no PH$. Pending means not enough observation, never a low score.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE—requires eligible AF-Player + governed role
AF MOVEMENT—two eligible completed seasons required
ROLE CHANGEUNAVAILABLEcomparison unavailable
STAR DEPENDENCY—governed What If sample unavailable
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2024–25
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
IND
Indiana Pacers
EXPECTED MIN0.8
SCORING SHARE0.8%
CREATION SHARE0.4%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR46.3%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.
MIN
Minnesota Timberwolves
EXPECTED MIN0.7
SCORING SHARE0.0%
CREATION SHARE1.5%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR32.5%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.