Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Nicolas Batum
LA Clippers current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYER33.92025–26
NBA RANK#338of 409
PH$7.2MDepth · fictional game currencySTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MIN0.0governed role
NEXT GAMEvs Sacramento Kings2026-10-21WHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN17.7
PTS4.0
REB2.5
AST0.9
STL0.6
BLK0.3
3PM1.3
FG%40.1%
3P%40.1%
FT%81.8%
+/--0.5
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · LA Clippers
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL22minutes
EXPECTED5.92pregame reference
DEVIATION+271.9%expanded minutes
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G2.4 PTS · 0.6 REB · 0.4 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G2.4 PTS · 2.2 REB · 0.6 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G2.7 PTS · 1.4 REB · 0.5 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G3.4 PTS · 2.9 REB · 0.8 AST
creation↑
efficiency↓
minutes↓
rebounding↑
scoring↓
MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS43.8%869/1984
2-POINT56.5%265/469
3-POINT39.9%604/1515
FREE THROW75.8%157/207
EFFECTIVE FG%59.0%
TRUE SHOOTING%60.2%
AST / TO2.59
PTS PER 369.33rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 217 | 21.92 | 5.58 | 3.62 | 1.64 | 1.31 | 0.84 | 0.57 |
| Away | 216 | 22.61 | 5.97 | 3.81 | 1.65 | 1.48 | 0.75 | 0.49 |
| Home − Away | — | -0.7 | -0.4 | -0.2 | -0.0 | -0.2 | +0.1 | +0.1 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1.64 | high |
| minutes | 16 | 22 | 29 | 22.26 | medium |
| points | 2 | 5 | 9 | 5.77 | high |
| rebounds | 2 | 3 | 5.6 | 3.72 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES10.2% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-12 | vs GSW | 22 | 5.92 | +271.9% | 9 | 3/5 | 0/0 | 3/5 | 0/0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | +10.0 | 90% |
| 2026-04-10 | @ POR | 5 | 7.03 | -28.8% | 0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -4.0 | 0% |
| 2026-04-08 | vs OKC | 5 | 8.05 | -37.9% | 3 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -2.0 | 150% |
| 2026-04-02 | vs SAS | 6 | 12.19 | -50.8% | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -16.0 | — |
| 2026-03-31 | vs POR | 6 | 11.85 | -49.4% | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2.0 | — |
| 2026-03-29 | @ MIL | 12 | 11.58 | +3.6% | 3 | 1/4 | 0/0 | 1/4 | 0/0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +5.0 | 38% |
| 2026-03-27 | @ IND | 14 | 9.56 | +46.4% | 3 | 1/5 | 0/1 | 1/4 | 0/0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3.0 | 30% |
| 2026-03-25 | vs TOR | 15 | 9.86 | +52.1% | 9 | 3/4 | 0/0 | 3/4 | 0/0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +3.0 | 113% |
| 2026-03-21 | @ DAL | 20 | 9.07 | +120.5% | 6 | 2/3 | 0/0 | 2/3 | 0/0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | -5.0 | 100% |
| 2026-03-16 | vs SAS | 12 | 10.84 | +10.7% | 0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -3.0 | 0% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS0.0%0/71 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/71 games
5+ ASSISTS0.0%0/71 games
2+ THREES38.0%27/71 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
| Season | Team(s) | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | LAC | 71 | 17.7 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 40.1% | 40.1% | 81.8% |
| 2024–25 | LAC | 77 | 17.5 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 43.4% | 43.0% | 81.0% |
| 2023–24 | PHILAC | 59 | 25.9 | 5.4 | 4.2 | 2.2 | 45.3% | 39.5% | 71.4% |
| 2022–23 | LAC | 78 | 21.9 | 6.1 | 3.8 | 1.6 | 42.0% | 39.1% | 70.8% |
| 2021–22 | LAC | 59 | 24.8 | 8.3 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 46.3% | 40.0% | 65.8% |
| 2020–21 | LAC | 67 | 27.4 | 8.1 | 4.7 | 2.2 | 46.4% | 40.4% | 82.8% |
| 2019–20 | CHA | 22 | 22.9 | 3.6 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 34.6% | 28.6% | 90.0% |
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | LAC | 71 | 33.9 | #338 / 409 | 7.2M | Depth |
| 2024–25 | LAC | 84 | 43.5 | #211 / 422 | 12.1M | Rotation |
| 2023–24 | PHI | 67 | 41.5 | #230 / 409 | 11.3M | Rotation |
| 2022–23 | LAC | 83 | 39.1 | #265 / 408 | 9.9M | Depth |
| 2021–22 | LAC | 61 | 45.3 | #171 / 423 | 14.1M | Rotation |
| 2020–21 | LAC | 87 | 48.9 | #124 / 410 | 19.6M | Core |
| 2019–20 | CHA | 48 | 28.8 | #347 / 385 | 5.7M | Depth |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2025–26
AF-PLAYER33.9descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#338of 409 ranked
PH$7.2MDepth
SAMPLE71observed games
Ball security54
Box defence38
Creation21
Efficiency56
Rebounding19
Scoring7
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE—requires eligible AF-Player + governed role
AF MOVEMENT-32.7 pp2024–25 → 2025–26
ROLE CHANGECONTRACTING-17.7 min vs latest observed MPG
STAR DEPENDENCY—governed What If sample unavailable
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
LAC
LA Clippers
EXPECTED MIN16.1
SCORING SHARE3.4%
CREATION SHARE3.9%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR81.9%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.