Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Kyle Kuzma
Milwaukee Bucks current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYER43.82025–26
NBA RANK#196of 409
PH$13.3MRotation · fictional game currencySTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MIN0.0governed role
NEXT GAME@ Washington Wizards2026-10-21WHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN26.3
PTS13.2
REB4.5
AST2.5
STL0.6
BLK0.3
3PM1.2
FG%49.3%
3P%35.6%
FT%71.5%
+/--3.9
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · Milwaukee Bucks
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED8.76pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G11 PTS · 2.2 REB · 1.4 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G13.2 PTS · 2.9 REB · 2.2 AST
creation↓
efficiency↑
minutes→
rebounding↓
scoring→
MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS45.2%2825/6254
2-POINT52.9%2003/3788
3-POINT33.3%822/2466
FREE THROW71.8%944/1315
EFFECTIVE FG%51.7%
TRUE SHOOTING%54.3%
AST / TO1.29
PTS PER 3619.5rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 222 | 30.35 | 16.5 | 6.35 | 2.93 | 1.82 | 0.53 | 0.52 |
| Away | 231 | 30.11 | 16.25 | 6.11 | 2.71 | 1.81 | 0.58 | 0.53 |
| Home − Away | — | +0.2 | +0.3 | +0.2 | +0.2 | +0.0 | -0.1 | -0.0 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2.82 | high |
| minutes | 24.4 | 31 | 36 | 30.22 | low |
| points | 9 | 16 | 23 | 16.37 | medium |
| rebounds | 3 | 6 | 9 | 6.23 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES7817.2% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES20.4% of games
10+ ASSISTS61.3%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-21 | @ PHX | 24 | 19.91 | +20.6% | 20 | 7/12 | 4/4 | 3/8 | 3/4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | +7.0 | 73% |
| 2026-03-17 | vs CLE | 17 | 21.69 | -21.6% | 3 | 1/6 | 0/2 | 1/4 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -6.0 | 25% |
| 2026-03-14 | @ ATL | 24 | 21.43 | +12% | 11 | 5/8 | 5/5 | 0/3 | 1/2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | -12.0 | 62% |
| 2026-03-12 | @ MIA | 20 | 18.97 | +5.5% | 5 | 2/5 | 1/1 | 1/4 | 0/0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | -10.0 | 50% |
| 2026-03-10 | vs PHX | 38 | 16.62 | +128.6% | 33 | 12/21 | 6/11 | 6/10 | 3/4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | -16.0 | 73% |
| 2026-03-07 | vs UTA | 29 | 20.57 | +41% | 18 | 6/12 | 3/7 | 3/5 | 3/3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | +7.0 | 68% |
| 2026-03-04 | vs ATL | 22 | 20.82 | +5.7% | 16 | 7/8 | 6/7 | 1/1 | 1/2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | +2.0 | 90% |
| 2026-03-01 | @ CHI | 23 | 24.38 | -5.6% | 10 | 4/5 | 4/4 | 0/1 | 2/3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | -24.0 | 79% |
| 2026-02-27 | vs NYK | 27 | 24.74 | +9.2% | 17 | 6/11 | 2/4 | 4/7 | 1/2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -16.0 | 72% |
| 2026-02-25 | vs CLE | 26 | 25.41 | +2.3% | 17 | 6/14 | 1/4 | 5/10 | 0/0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | +5.0 | 61% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS12.9%8/62 games
10+ REBOUNDS8.1%5/62 games
5+ ASSISTS16.1%10/62 games
2+ THREES30.6%19/62 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
| Season | Team(s) | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | MIL | 62 | 26.3 | 13.2 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 49.3% | 35.6% | 71.5% |
| 2024–25 | MILWAS | 63 | 30.0 | 14.7 | 5.8 | 2.3 | 43.0% | 29.5% | 64.1% |
| 2023–24 | WAS | 70 | 32.6 | 22.2 | 6.6 | 4.2 | 46.3% | 33.6% | 77.5% |
| 2022–23 | WAS | 64 | 35.0 | 21.2 | 7.2 | 3.7 | 44.9% | 33.3% | 73.0% |
| 2021–22 | WAS | 65 | 33.4 | 17.1 | 8.6 | 3.6 | 45.0% | 33.3% | 71.2% |
| 2020–21 | LAL | 68 | 28.7 | 12.8 | 6.2 | 1.9 | 44.3% | 36.0% | 69.1% |
| 2019–20 | LAL | 61 | 25.0 | 12.8 | 4.5 | 1.3 | 43.6% | 31.6% | 73.6% |
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | MIL | 62 | 43.8 | #196 / 409 | 13.3M | Rotation |
| 2024–25 | MIL | 68 | 29.9 | #390 / 422 | 7.3M | Depth |
| 2023–24 | WAS | 70 | 48.6 | #135 / 409 | 17.8M | Core |
| 2022–23 | WAS | 64 | 42.7 | #206 / 408 | 13.4M | Rotation |
| 2021–22 | WAS | 65 | 45.6 | #167 / 423 | 16.3M | Core |
| 2020–21 | LAL | 75 | 37.1 | #310 / 410 | 9.8M | Depth |
| 2019–20 | LAL | 82 | 34.5 | #297 / 385 | 9.2M | Depth |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2025–26
AF-PLAYER43.8descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#196of 409 ranked
PH$13.3MRotation
SAMPLE62observed games
Ball security61
Box defence25
Creation34
Efficiency52
Rebounding29
Scoring53
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE—requires eligible AF-Player + governed role
AF MOVEMENT+44.6 pp2024–25 → 2025–26
ROLE CHANGECONTRACTING-26.3 min vs latest observed MPG
STAR DEPENDENCY—governed What If sample unavailable
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
MIL
Milwaukee Bucks
EXPECTED MIN24.0
SCORING SHARE11.5%
CREATION SHARE9.2%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR82.1%
+7.15 residual margin pts in the qualified normal-load vs nonparticipation diagnostic · 45 normal-load / 3 nonparticipation games.