Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Khris Middleton
Washington Wizards current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYER33.72025–26
NBA RANK#342of 409
PH$6.9MDepth · fictional game currencySTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MIN0.0governed role
NEXT GAMEvs Milwaukee Bucks2026-10-21WHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN23.6
PTS10.2
REB3.8
AST2.9
STL0.6
BLK0.2
3PM0.9
FG%41.8%
3P%32.6%
FT%86.6%
+/--5.1
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · Washington Wizards
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED14.05pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G7.2 PTS · 3 REB · 1.4 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G0 PTS · 0.1 REB · 0.1 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G7.1 PTS · 2.5 REB · 2.1 AST
creation↓
efficiency→
minutes↓
rebounding→
scoring→
MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS46.7%2236/4787
2-POINT52.0%1549/2981
3-POINT38.0%687/1806
FREE THROW88.8%1026/1156
EFFECTIVE FG%53.9%
TRUE SHOOTING%58.4%
AST / TO2.05
PTS PER 3621.4rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 181 | 28.17 | 16.4 | 5.14 | 4.75 | 1.86 | 0.84 | 0.19 |
| Away | 183 | 29 | 17.57 | 4.94 | 4.7 | 1.92 | 1.01 | 0.2 |
| Home − Away | — | -0.8 | -1.2 | +0.2 | +0.1 | -0.1 | -0.2 | -0.0 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 3 | 5 | 7 | 4.73 | high |
| minutes | 23 | 29.6 | 34.4 | 28.59 | low |
| points | 11 | 17 | 23 | 16.99 | medium |
| rebounds | 3 | 5 | 7 | 5.04 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES318.5% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES10.3% of games
10+ ASSISTS123.3%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-03 | vs ORL | 12 | 14.05 | -14.6% | 0 | 0/4 | 0/1 | 0/3 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | -10.0 | 0% |
| 2026-03-21 | vs LAC | 14 | 21.42 | -34.6% | 8 | 2/6 | 0/2 | 2/4 | 2/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -1.0 | 58% |
| 2026-03-18 | vs ATL | 19 | 22.89 | -17% | 7 | 2/6 | 1/5 | 1/1 | 2/2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | -8.0 | 51% |
| 2026-03-13 | vs CLE | 17 | 24.29 | -30% | 4 | 2/6 | 2/5 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -12.0 | 33% |
| 2026-03-10 | @ ATL | 24 | 25.27 | -5% | 16 | 5/8 | 3/5 | 2/3 | 4/4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | +7.0 | 82% |
| 2026-03-08 | @ TOR | 19 | 24.38 | -22.1% | 6 | 2/7 | 2/6 | 0/1 | 2/2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | -17.0 | 38% |
| 2026-03-06 | @ BOS | 24 | 24.7 | -2.8% | 7 | 2/8 | 2/6 | 0/2 | 3/4 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -18.0 | 36% |
| 2026-03-05 | @ ORL | 32 | 22.95 | +39.5% | 19 | 7/15 | 6/12 | 1/3 | 4/5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | -1.0 | 55% |
| 2026-03-03 | @ CHA | 29 | 22.79 | +27.2% | 9 | 4/11 | 4/9 | 0/2 | 1/1 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | -9.0 | 39% |
| 2026-03-01 | vs OKC | 25 | 22.26 | +12.3% | 4 | 2/10 | 2/7 | 0/3 | 0/0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | -15.0 | 20% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS2.1%1/48 games
10+ REBOUNDS2.1%1/48 games
5+ ASSISTS16.7%8/48 games
2+ THREES25.0%12/48 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
| Season | Team(s) | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | WASDAL | 48 | 23.6 | 10.2 | 3.8 | 2.9 | 41.8% | 32.6% | 86.6% |
| 2024–25 | MILWAS | 35 | 23.5 | 12.2 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 47.4% | 36.1% | 86.6% |
| 2023–24 | MIL | 55 | 27.1 | 15.1 | 4.7 | 5.3 | 49.3% | 38.1% | 83.3% |
| 2022–23 | MIL | 33 | 24.3 | 15.1 | 4.2 | 4.9 | 43.6% | 31.5% | 90.2% |
| 2021–22 | MIL | 64 | 32.4 | 20.1 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 44.4% | 37.1% | 88.8% |
| 2020–21 | MIL | 67 | 33.3 | 20.3 | 5.9 | 5.4 | 47.5% | 41.3% | 89.8% |
| 2019–20 | MIL | 62 | 29.9 | 20.9 | 6.2 | 4.3 | 49.7% | 41.5% | 91.6% |
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | DAL | 48 | 33.7 | #342 / 409 | 6.9M | Depth |
| 2024–25 | MIL | 35 | 52.4 | #89 / 422 | 15.6M | Core |
| 2023–24 | MIL | 61 | 53.4 | #80 / 409 | 19.2M | Core |
| 2022–23 | MIL | 38 | 51.1 | #86 / 408 | 15.9M | Core |
| 2021–22 | MIL | 66 | 53.4 | #70 / 423 | 22.2M | Core |
| 2020–21 | MIL | 90 | 52.1 | #88 / 410 | 23M | Core |
| 2019–20 | MIL | 73 | 57.4 | #35 / 385 | 25.4M | High Value |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2025–26
AF-PLAYER33.7descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#342of 409 ranked
PH$6.9MDepth
SAMPLE48observed games
Ball security36
Box defence23
Creation44
Efficiency27
Rebounding30
Scoring44
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE—requires eligible AF-Player + governed role
AF MOVEMENT-62.7 pp2024–25 → 2025–26
ROLE CHANGECONTRACTING-23.6 min vs latest observed MPG
STAR DEPENDENCY—governed What If sample unavailable
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
WAS
Washington Wizards
EXPECTED MIN15.3
SCORING SHARE9.5%
CREATION SHARE13.1%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR60.5%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.
DAL
Dallas Mavericks
EXPECTED MIN21.8
SCORING SHARE10.2%
CREATION SHARE10.0%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR81.8%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.