Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Anfernee Simons
Philadelphia 76ers current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYER43.52025–26
NBA RANK#201of 409
PH$12MRotation · fictional game currencySTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MIN0.0governed role
NEXT GAME@ New York Knicks2026-10-20WHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN25.1
PTS14.4
REB2.5
AST2.5
STL0.5
BLK0.1
3PM2.7
FG%44.3%
3P%38.8%
FT%90.4%
+/-+1.6
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · Philadelphia 76ers
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED0.66pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G17 PTS · 2.8 REB · 2 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G14.4 PTS · 2.6 REB · 2.3 AST
creation↓
efficiency→
minutes→
rebounding↑
scoring↑
MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS43.2%2305/5341
2-POINT48.9%1213/2483
3-POINT38.2%1092/2858
FREE THROW88.6%781/881
EFFECTIVE FG%53.4%
TRUE SHOOTING%56.6%
AST / TO2.04
PTS PER 3620.19rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 212 | 27.05 | 14.95 | 2.58 | 3.31 | 2.47 | 0.47 | 0.16 |
| Away | 208 | 28 | 15.93 | 2.62 | 3.25 | 2.74 | 0.6 | 0.11 |
| Home − Away | — | -0.9 | -1.0 | -0.0 | +0.1 | -0.3 | -0.1 | +0.1 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 1 | 3 | 6 | 3.28 | high |
| minutes | 19 | 28.4 | 36 | 27.52 | medium |
| points | 7 | 14 | 24 | 15.44 | high |
| rebounds | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2.6 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES81.9% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS71.7%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-21 | vs DET | 13 | 26.97 | -51.8% | 4 | 2/6 | 2/5 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +3.0 | 33% |
| 2026-02-19 | vs TOR | 31 | 24.49 | +26.6% | 20 | 7/18 | 3/7 | 4/11 | 2/2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | -21.0 | 53% |
| 2026-02-11 | @ BOS | 28 | 22.3 | +25.6% | 7 | 3/9 | 2/3 | 1/6 | 0/0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -13.0 | 39% |
| 2026-02-09 | @ BKN | 34 | 19.77 | +72% | 23 | 10/17 | 8/8 | 2/9 | 1/1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | -19.0 | 66% |
| 2026-02-07 | vs DEN | 32 | 20.76 | +54.1% | 15 | 5/15 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | -6.0 | 47% |
| 2026-02-05 | @ TOR | 32 | — | — | 22 | 8/15 | 2/2 | 6/13 | 0/0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | -10.0 | 73% |
| 2026-02-01 | vs MIL | 25 | 25.84 | -3.3% | 27 | 10/18 | 4/8 | 6/10 | 1/1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | +10.0 | 73% |
| 2026-01-30 | vs SAC | 26 | 25.35 | +2.6% | 16 | 6/16 | 4/6 | 2/10 | 2/2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -8.0 | 47% |
| 2026-01-28 | vs ATL | 19 | 26.34 | -27.9% | 12 | 5/7 | 3/3 | 2/4 | 0/0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -4.0 | 86% |
| 2026-01-26 | vs POR | 26 | — | — | 12 | 5/12 | 3/5 | 2/7 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -9.0 | 50% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS22.6%12/53 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/53 games
5+ ASSISTS13.2%7/53 games
2+ THREES71.7%38/53 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
| Season | Team(s) | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | CHIBOS | 53 | 25.1 | 14.4 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 44.3% | 38.8% | 90.4% |
| 2024–25 | POR | 68 | 32.9 | 19.2 | 2.7 | 4.9 | 42.3% | 36.2% | 89.8% |
| 2023–24 | POR | 46 | 34.4 | 22.6 | 3.6 | 5.5 | 43.0% | 38.5% | 91.6% |
| 2022–23 | POR | 62 | 35.1 | 21.1 | 2.6 | 4.1 | 44.7% | 37.7% | 89.4% |
| 2021–22 | POR | 57 | 29.5 | 17.3 | 2.7 | 3.9 | 44.4% | 40.5% | 88.8% |
| 2020–21 | POR | 64 | 17.3 | 7.8 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 41.9% | 42.5% | 80.7% |
| 2019–20 | POR | 70 | 20.7 | 8.3 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 39.9% | 33.2% | 82.6% |
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | BOS | 53 | 43.5 | #201 / 409 | 12M | Rotation |
| 2024–25 | POR | 68 | 44.8 | #195 / 422 | 14.9M | Rotation |
| 2023–24 | POR | 46 | 47.9 | #141 / 409 | 15.1M | Core |
| 2022–23 | POR | 62 | 44.4 | #183 / 408 | 14.4M | Rotation |
| 2021–22 | POR | 57 | 47.1 | #139 / 423 | 16.3M | Core |
| 2020–21 | POR | 76 | 42.9 | #205 / 410 | 11.4M | Rotation |
| 2019–20 | POR | 79 | 27.2 | #366 / 385 | 6.5M | Depth |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2025–26
AF-PLAYER43.5descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#201of 409 ranked
PH$12MRotation
SAMPLE53observed games
Ball security78
Box defence14
Creation40
Efficiency47
Rebounding14
Scoring65
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE—requires eligible AF-Player + governed role
AF MOVEMENT-2.9 pp2024–25 → 2025–26
ROLE CHANGECONTRACTING-25.1 min vs latest observed MPG
STAR DEPENDENCY—governed What If sample unavailable
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
CHI
Chicago Bulls
EXPECTED MIN14.0
SCORING SHARE14.9%
CREATION SHARE14.4%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR59.1%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.
BOS
Boston Celtics
EXPECTED MIN22.0
SCORING SHARE12.6%
CREATION SHARE9.7%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR80.7%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.