PROBHOOPS · NBA ANALYTICS · TEAMS · PLAYERS · PROBABILITIES
FIND ANYTHING

Teams & players

Start typing to search the ProbHoops directory.

Tip: press / anywhere to search.

PLAYER PROFILE · HISTORICAL

W. Clayton Jr.

Accepted historical regular-season production. No current 2026–27 roster status is inferred.

Memphis Grizzlies · last observed team
AF-PLAYER32.52025–26
NBA RANK#355of 409
PH$6.4MDepth · fictional game currency
STATUSHistoricalno current binding
EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported
NEXT GAMENo assigned gameSchedule pendingWHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual
REGULAR-SEASON GAMES54

Player-safe accepted corpus.

CAREER PPG · CORPUS7.0

2019–20 through 2025–26 window.

CAREER RPG · CORPUS2.0

Historical window, not full NBA career.

CAREER APG · CORPUS3.4

Historical window, not full NBA career.

LATEST COMPLETED SEASON

2025–26

54 games
MIN19.0
PTS7.0
REB2.0
AST3.4
STL0.5
BLK0.3
3PM1.0
FG%37.0%
3P%29.9%
FT%89.7%
+/--3.8

NEXT GAME

Current context

No current roster binding is published for this historical profile. ProbHoops does not infer a current team, availability or expected minutes from historical data.

MINUTES + FORM

Role-adjusted performance

Current form is unavailable because this historical profile is not bound to the governed 2026–27 roster. No current role is inferred.

LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26

Historical Minutes Intelligence

DESCRIPTIVE · NOT CURRENT

Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.

LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED23.46pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown

LAST 5

ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G7.8 PTS · 2.4 REB · 3 AST

LAST 10

ALL OBSERVED10 G0.7 PTS · 0.2 REB · 0.1 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G6.6 PTS · 1.9 REB · 2.7 AST

MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.

SPLITS + EFFICIENCY

How the production is built

EFFICIENCY

Shooting, derived from the box score

CAREER · 54 GAMES

2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.

FIELD GOALS37.0%123/332
2-POINT46.2%67/145
3-POINT29.9%56/187
FREE THROW89.7%78/87
EFFECTIVE FG%45.5%
TRUE SHOOTING%51.3%
AST / TO2.49
PTS PER 3613.35rate, not projection

HOME / AWAY

Where the games were played

29 HOME · 25 AWAY
SplitGMINPTSREBAST3PMSTLBLK
Home2917.666.11.622.620.830.450.34
Away2520.528.122.44.241.280.640.2
Home − Away—-2.9-2.0-0.8-1.6-0.5-0.2+0.1

Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.

CONSISTENCY

What the average hides

54 GAMES

Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.

CategoryFloorMedianCeilingMeanVolatility
assists235.43.37high
minutes13192418.98medium
points46.5107.04high
rebounds1231.98high

Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.

DOUBLE-DOUBLES

Observed frequency across the corpus

54 GAMES
DOUBLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%

Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.

GAME LOG · 2025–26

One log, the window you choose

10 games
DateOppMINEXP MINMIN ΔPTSFG2P3PFTORDRREBASTSTLBLKTOVPF+/-TS%
2026-03-27vs HOU2322.46+2.4%71/81/60/25/611210112-11.033%
2026-03-25vs SAS2222.06-0.3%103/81/42/42/402260121-5.051%
2026-03-23@ ATL2820.7+35.2%164/130/14/124/501161141-37.053%
2026-03-21@ CHA2220.42+7.7%114/91/33/60/004422014-19.061%
2026-03-20vs BOS2719.18+40.8%41/71/30/42/212320020-16.025%
2026-03-18vs DEN2019.77+1.2%41/61/30/32/2022400120.029%
2026-03-03@ MIN2418.22+31.7%92/61/31/34/401192020+9.058%
2026-02-25vs GSW22——41/80/41/41/200030013-6.023%
2026-02-21@ MIA25——94/113/51/60/004460026-1.041%
2026-02-01@ TOR18——73/92/41/50/011220032-1.039%

All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.

HISTORY

Season and milestone evidence

DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26

How often did the threshold occur?

historical frequency

These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.

20+ POINTS1.8%1/54 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/54 games
5+ ASSISTS27.8%15/54 games
2+ THREES24.1%13/54 games

SEASON HISTORY

Regular-season production

accepted player-safe games
SeasonTeam(s)GMINPTSREBASTFG%3P%FT%
2025–26UTAMEM5419.07.02.03.437.0%29.9%89.7%

CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY

No current roster binding for this historical profile

governed identity

This historical profile is not currently bound to the NBA Official 2026–27 roster product. ProbHoops does not infer a current team from historical data.

Open team profile

IMPACT

Rating and role context

AF-PLAYER

Measured production, 2025–26

#355 OF 409
AF-PLAYER32.5descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#355of 409 ranked
PH$6.4MDepth
SAMPLE54observed games
Ball security
32
Box defence
27
Creation
71
Efficiency
21
Rebounding
13
Scoring
33

PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.

PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26

Pregame role and with/without context

descriptive · not causal

Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.

UTA

Utah Jazz

EXPECTED MIN14.1
SCORING SHARE6.0%
CREATION SHARE11.3%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR74.6%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.

MEM

Memphis Grizzlies

EXPECTED MIN20.4
SCORING SHARE5.7%
CREATION SHARE17.6%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR76.5%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.