PROBHOOPS · NBA ANALYTICS · TEAMS · PLAYERS · PROBABILITIES
FIND ANYTHING

Teams & players

Start typing to search the ProbHoops directory.

Tip: press / anywhere to search.

PLAYER PROFILE · HISTORICAL

Vernon Carey Jr.

Accepted historical regular-season production. No current 2026–27 roster status is inferred.

Washington Wizards · last observed teamUSADuke
AF-PLAYERPendingsample gate
NBA RANK—not ranked
PH$—pending · how PH$ works
STATUSHistoricalno current binding
EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported
NEXT GAMENo assigned gameSchedule pendingWHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual
REGULAR-SEASON GAMES37

Player-safe accepted corpus.

CAREER PPG · CORPUS1.9

2019–20 through 2025–26 window.

CAREER RPG · CORPUS1.4

Historical window, not full NBA career.

CAREER APG · CORPUS0.1

Historical window, not full NBA career.

LATEST COMPLETED SEASON

2022–23

11 games
MIN2.5
PTS0.6
REB1.0
AST0.3
STL0.2
BLK0.2
3PM0.0
FG%25.0%
3P%—
FT%100.0%
+/--0.9

NEXT GAME

Current context

No current roster binding is published for this historical profile. ProbHoops does not infer a current team, availability or expected minutes from historical data.

MINUTES + FORM

Role-adjusted performance

Current form is unavailable because this historical profile is not bound to the governed 2026–27 roster. No current role is inferred.

LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2022–23

Historical Minutes Intelligence

DESCRIPTIVE · NOT CURRENT

Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.

LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED0.39pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown

LAST 5

ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT1 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST

LAST 10

ALL OBSERVED10 G0.2 PTS · 0.3 REB · 0.1 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT1 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST

Form label withheld: insufficient role-consistent sample. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.

SPLITS + EFFICIENCY

How the production is built

EFFICIENCY

Shooting, derived from the box score

CAREER · 37 GAMES

2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.

FIELD GOALS47.4%27/57
2-POINT52.0%26/50
3-POINT—1/7
FREE THROW65.4%17/26
EFFECTIVE FG%48.3%
TRUE SHOOTING%52.6%
AST / TO0.5
PTS PER 3613.87rate, not projection

HOME / AWAY

Where the games were played

18 HOME · 19 AWAY
SplitGMINPTSREBAST3PMSTLBLK
Home183.560.940.830.0600.110.11
Away196.462.891.840.210.050.160.32
Home − Away—-2.9-1.9-1.0-0.1-0.1-0.1-0.2

Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.

CONSISTENCY

What the average hides

37 GAMES

Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.

CategoryFloorMedianCeilingMeanVolatility
assists0000.14high
minutes1.736.45.05high
points002.81.95high
rebounds0121.35high

Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.

DOUBLE-DOUBLES

Observed frequency across the corpus

37 GAMES
DOUBLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%

Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.

GAME LOG · 2022–23

One log, the window you choose

10 games
DateOppMINEXP MINMIN ΔPTSFG2P3PFTORDRREBASTSTLBLKTOVPF+/-TS%
2023-02-14@ POR20.89+124.4%21/11/10/00/003310000+8.0100%
2023-02-11vs IND30.58+413%00/10/10/00/000000001-5.00%
2023-01-30@ SAS21.19+67.7%20/00/00/02/200000000+2.0114%
2023-01-25@ HOU6——00/30/30/00/021311002-8.00%
2023-01-06@ OKC31.21+148.7%00/00/00/00/001100000+1.0—
2023-01-03@ MIL11.08-7%00/00/00/00/000000100+4.0—
2023-01-01@ MIL40.41+887%21/11/10/00/0101011100.0100%
2022-12-28vs PHX2——00/00/00/00/002210000+1.0—
2022-11-28vs MIN3——00/20/20/00/001100011-11.00%
2022-11-12vs UTA1——00/00/00/00/000000001-4.0—

All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.

HISTORY

Season and milestone evidence

DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2022–23

How often did the threshold occur?

historical frequency

These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.

20+ POINTS0.0%0/11 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/11 games
5+ ASSISTS0.0%0/11 games
2+ THREES0.0%0/11 games

SEASON HISTORY

Regular-season production

accepted player-safe games
SeasonTeam(s)GMINPTSREBASTFG%3P%FT%
2022–23WAS112.50.61.00.325.0%—100.0%
2021–22CHAWAS76.32.91.70.053.8%—46.2%
2020–21CHA196.02.41.40.150.0%14.3%81.8%

CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY

No current roster binding for this historical profile

governed identity

This historical profile is not currently bound to the NBA Official 2026–27 roster product. ProbHoops does not infer a current team from historical data.

Open team profile

IMPACT

Rating and role context

AF-PLAYER

Measured production, 2022–23

PENDING SAMPLE

ProbHoops has observed 11 games of this player in 2022–23 — below the sample floor required to rank. He carries no AF-Player and no PH$. Pending means not enough observation, never a low score.

PLAYER IMPACT · 2022–23

Pregame role and with/without context

descriptive · not causal

Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.

WAS

Washington Wizards

EXPECTED MIN0.8
SCORING SHARE0.2%
CREATION SHARE0.6%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR33.0%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.