Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Terance Mann
Brooklyn Nets current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYER38.32025–26
NBA RANK#284of 409
PH$9.1MDepth · fictional game currencySTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MIN0.0governed role
NEXT GAMEvs Charlotte Hornets2026-10-21WHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN24.7
PTS7.6
REB3.3
AST3.1
STL0.7
BLK0.3
3PM0.9
FG%46.4%
3P%36.7%
FT%80.3%
+/--3.2
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · Brooklyn Nets
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED12.55pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G8.4 PTS · 1.8 REB · 2 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G1.7 PTS · 1.1 REB · 0.6 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G7.2 PTS · 2.2 REB · 2.4 AST
creation↓
efficiency↑
minutes→
rebounding↓
scoring↑
MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS49.8%1434/2877
2-POINT56.8%1055/1857
3-POINT37.2%379/1020
FREE THROW78.3%503/642
EFFECTIVE FG%56.4%
TRUE SHOOTING%59.4%
AST / TO2.53
PTS PER 3612.89rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 228 | 22.85 | 8.68 | 3.64 | 2.32 | 0.83 | 0.53 | 0.23 |
| Away | 239 | 22.03 | 7.41 | 3.36 | 1.82 | 0.79 | 0.62 | 0.22 |
| Home − Away | — | +0.8 | +1.3 | +0.3 | +0.5 | +0.0 | -0.1 | +0.0 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2.06 | high |
| minutes | 15.7 | 24 | 30 | 22.43 | medium |
| points | 3 | 7 | 13 | 8.03 | high |
| rebounds | 1 | 3 | 5 | 3.5 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES122.6% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-29 | vs SAC | 22 | 14.88 | +47.8% | 8 | 2/3 | 0/0 | 2/3 | 2/2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | +4.0 | 103% |
| 2026-03-27 | @ LAL | 22 | 13.74 | +60.1% | 5 | 2/4 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -16.0 | 63% |
| 2026-03-25 | @ GSW | 23 | 12.51 | +83.9% | 4 | 2/7 | 2/4 | 0/3 | 0/0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | +4.0 | 29% |
| 2026-03-22 | @ SAC | 26 | 12.53 | +107.5% | 5 | 2/5 | 1/2 | 1/3 | 0/0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | -4.0 | 50% |
| 2026-03-14 | @ PHI | 18 | 15.23 | +18.2% | 5 | 2/6 | 1/4 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -21.0 | 42% |
| 2026-03-12 | @ ATL | 16 | 15.47 | +3.4% | 8 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 0/0 | 2/2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +6.0 | 68% |
| 2026-03-07 | @ DET | 29 | 17.03 | +70.3% | 7 | 3/7 | 3/4 | 0/3 | 1/2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | +12.0 | 44% |
| 2026-03-05 | @ MIA | 29 | 14.68 | +97.5% | 7 | 3/6 | 2/4 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +6.0 | 58% |
| 2026-02-24 | vs DAL | 19 | 19.96 | -4.8% | 17 | 6/9 | 4/6 | 2/3 | 3/4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -13.0 | 79% |
| 2026-02-22 | @ ATL | 17 | 18.37 | -7.4% | 6 | 2/3 | 0/0 | 2/3 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0.0 | 100% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS1.8%1/56 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/56 games
5+ ASSISTS26.8%15/56 games
2+ THREES26.8%15/56 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
| Season | Team(s) | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | BKN | 56 | 24.7 | 7.6 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 46.4% | 36.7% | 80.3% |
| 2024–25 | LACATL | 66 | 21.1 | 7.8 | 3.0 | 1.8 | 50.0% | 36.9% | 69.1% |
| 2023–24 | LAC | 75 | 25.0 | 8.8 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 51.5% | 34.8% | 83.2% |
| 2022–23 | LAC | 81 | 23.2 | 8.8 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 52.0% | 38.9% | 78.0% |
| 2021–22 | LAC | 81 | 28.6 | 10.8 | 5.3 | 2.6 | 48.4% | 36.5% | 78.0% |
| 2020–21 | LAC | 67 | 18.9 | 7.0 | 3.6 | 1.6 | 50.9% | 41.8% | 83.0% |
| 2019–20 | LAC | 41 | 8.8 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 46.8% | 35.0% | 66.7% |
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | BKN | 56 | 38.3 | #284 / 409 | 9.1M | Depth |
| 2024–25 | ATL | 68 | 41.7 | #238 / 422 | 10.6M | Rotation |
| 2023–24 | LAC | 81 | 41.5 | #229 / 409 | 12.2M | Rotation |
| 2022–23 | LAC | 86 | 45.1 | #174 / 408 | 14.3M | Rotation |
| 2021–22 | LAC | 83 | 42.7 | #217 / 423 | 14.1M | Rotation |
| 2020–21 | LAC | 90 | 46.8 | #155 / 410 | 15.3M | Core |
| 2019–20 | LAC | 65 | 35.1 | #290 / 385 | 6.4M | Depth |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2025–26
AF-PLAYER38.3descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#284of 409 ranked
PH$9.1MDepth
SAMPLE56observed games
Ball security41
Box defence25
Creation58
Efficiency47
Rebounding27
Scoring18
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE—requires eligible AF-Player + governed role
AF MOVEMENT-13.1 pp2024–25 → 2025–26
ROLE CHANGECONTRACTING-24.7 min vs latest observed MPG
STAR DEPENDENCY—governed What If sample unavailable
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
BKN
Brooklyn Nets
EXPECTED MIN20.6
SCORING SHARE7.3%
CREATION SHARE12.0%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR75.8%
-1.98 residual margin pts in the qualified normal-load vs nonparticipation diagnostic · 15 normal-load / 5 nonparticipation games.