PLAYER PROFILE · HISTORICAL

Reggie Perry

Accepted historical regular-season production. No current 2026–27 roster status is inferred.

Portland Trail Blazers · last observed teamUSAMississippi State

AF-PLAYERPendingsample gate

NBA RANK—not ranked

PH$—pending · how PH$ works

STATUSHistoricalno current binding

EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported

NEXT GAMENo assigned gameSchedule pending WHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual

REGULAR-SEASON GAMES36

Player-safe accepted corpus.

CAREER PPG · CORPUS4.7

2019–20 through 2025–26 window.

CAREER RPG · CORPUS3.4

Historical window, not full NBA career.

CAREER APG · CORPUS0.7

Historical window, not full NBA career.

LATEST COMPLETED SEASON

2021–22

10 games

MIN18.7

PTS9.2

REB4.7

AST1.2

STL0.9

BLK0.6

3PM0.3

FG%50.6%

3P%18.8%

FT%60.0%

+/--7.8

NEXT GAME

Current context

No current roster binding is published for this historical profile. ProbHoops does not infer a current team, availability or expected minutes from historical data.

MINUTES + FORM

Role-adjusted performance

Current form is unavailable because this historical profile is not bound to the governed 2026–27 roster. No current role is inferred.

LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2021–22

Historical Minutes Intelligence

DESCRIPTIVE · NOT CURRENT

Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.

LATEST ACTUAL33.45minutes

EXPECTED14.79pregame reference

DEVIATION+126.2%expanded minutes

LAST 5

ALL OBSERVED5 G10.6 PTS · 4.6 REB · 2 AST

ROLE-CONSISTENT1 G9 PTS · 2 REB · 0 AST

LAST 10

ALL OBSERVED10 G7.9 PTS · 3.9 REB · 1 AST

ROLE-CONSISTENT1 G9 PTS · 2 REB · 0 AST

creation—

efficiency—

minutes—

rebounding—

scoring—

Form label withheld: insufficient role-consistent sample. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.

SPLITS + EFFICIENCY

How the production is built

EFFICIENCY

Shooting, derived from the box score

CAREER · 36 GAMES

2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.

FIELD GOALS45.9%72/157

2-POINT54.2%65/120

3-POINT18.9%7/37

FREE THROW67.9%19/28

EFFECTIVE FG%48.1%

TRUE SHOOTING%50.2%

AST / TO1

PTS PER 3615.38rate, not projection

HOME / AWAY

Where the games were played

19 HOME · 17 AWAY

Split	G	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	3PM	STL	BLK
Home	19	8.91	4	2.95	0.63	0.05	0.11	0.32
Away	17	13.45	5.53	3.82	0.82	0.35	0.76	0.35
Home − Away	—	-4.5	-1.5	-0.9	-0.2	-0.3	-0.7	-0.0

Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.

CONSISTENCY

What the average hides

36 GAMES

Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.

Category	Floor	Median	Ceiling	Mean	Volatility
assists	0	0	1	0.72	high
minutes	3.4	9.8	16.6	11.05	high
points	0	4	9	4.72	high
rebounds	1	3	5	3.36	high

Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.

DOUBLE-DOUBLES

Observed frequency across the corpus

36 GAMES

DOUBLE-DOUBLES25.6% of games

TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games

10+ ASSISTS00.0%

10+ BLOCKS00.0%

Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.

GAME LOG · 2021–22

One log, the window you choose

10 games

Date	Opp	MIN	EXP MIN	MIN Δ	PTS	FG	2P	3P	FT	OR	DR	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	+/-	TS%
2022-04-10	vs UTA	33.5	14.79	+126.2%	20	9/17	8/13	1/4	1/3	2	6	8	5	0	2	2	4	-14.0	55%
2022-04-08	@ DAL	16.1	14.33	+12.3%	9	4/7	4/6	0/1	1/1	2	0	2	0	1	0	1	4	-18.0	61%
2022-04-07	@ NOP	21.8	10.65	+104.4%	15	7/10	7/9	0/1	1/1	2	1	3	1	4	2	2	5	-23.0	72%
2022-04-05	@ OKC	13.3	8.62	+54.2%	2	1/6	1/4	0/2	0/0	0	4	4	3	1	0	2	1	-4.0	17%
2022-04-03	@ SAS	16.4	6.12	+167.3%	7	3/9	3/7	0/2	1/2	1	5	6	1	2	1	0	4	-1.0	35%
2022-04-01	@ SAS	19	3.22	+488.8%	11	5/9	4/7	1/2	0/2	2	8	10	0	0	1	2	1	+3.0	56%
2022-03-30	vs NOP	16.6	—	—	15	6/11	6/9	0/2	3/4	4	2	6	0	0	0	1	5	-3.0	59%
2022-02-04	vs CHI	9.9	—	—	2	1/1	1/1	0/0	0/0	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	3	-4.0	100%
2021-12-31	@ LAL	26.4	11.68	+126.2%	7	2/6	1/5	1/1	2/2	2	2	4	1	1	0	1	2	-8.0	51%
2021-12-29	vs UTA	14.4	—	—	4	2/3	2/2	0/1	0/0	0	3	3	1	0	0	0	4	-6.0	67%

All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.

HISTORY

Season and milestone evidence

DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2021–22

How often did the threshold occur?

historical frequency

These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.

20+ POINTS10.0%1/10 games

10+ REBOUNDS10.0%1/10 games

5+ ASSISTS10.0%1/10 games

2+ THREES0.0%0/10 games

SEASON HISTORY

Regular-season production

accepted player-safe games

Season	Team(s)	G	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	FG%	3P%	FT%
2021–22	IND POR	10	18.7	9.2	4.7	1.2	50.6%	18.8%	60.0%
2020–21	BKN	26	8.1	3.0	2.9	0.5	41.0%	19.1%	76.9%

CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY

No current roster binding for this historical profile

governed identity

This historical profile is not currently bound to the NBA Official 2026–27 roster product. ProbHoops does not infer a current team from historical data.

Open team profile

IMPACT

Rating and role context

AF-PLAYER

Measured production, 2021–22

PENDING SAMPLE

ProbHoops has observed 12 games of this player in 2021–22 — below the sample floor required to rank. He carries no AF-Player and no PH$. Pending means not enough observation, never a low score.

PLAYER IMPACT · 2021–22

Pregame role and with/without context

descriptive · not causal

Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.

IND

Indiana Pacers

EXPECTED MIN2.4

SCORING SHARE1.7%

CREATION SHARE0.0%

PARTICIPATION PRIOR33.7%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.

POR

Portland Trail Blazers

EXPECTED MIN7.8

SCORING SHARE6.2%

CREATION SHARE4.3%

PARTICIPATION PRIOR41.0%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.