Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Quenton Jackson
Indiana Pacers current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYER49.82025–26
NBA RANK#111of 409
PH$12.6MRotation · fictional game currencySTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MIN16.3governed role
NEXT GAME@ New Orleans Pelicans2026-10-21WHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN16.8
PTS8.1
REB2.3
AST2.5
STL0.5
BLK0.2
3PM0.9
FG%47.3%
3P%37.3%
FT%76.1%
+/-+0.0
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · Indiana Pacers
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED11.17pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G3.2 PTS · 0.8 REB · 1.2 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT3 G6.33 PTS · 1.33 REB · 2 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G3.3 PTS · 0.9 REB · 1.1 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT3 G6.33 PTS · 1.33 REB · 2 AST
creation—
efficiency—
minutes—
rebounding—
scoring—
Form label withheld: insufficient role-consistent sample. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS46.5%133/286
2-POINT53.6%97/181
3-POINT34.3%36/105
FREE THROW74.8%74/99
EFFECTIVE FG%52.8%
TRUE SHOOTING%57.0%
AST / TO3.08
PTS PER 3615.7rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 31 | 15.84 | 7.39 | 1.97 | 2.32 | 0.77 | 0.61 | 0.16 |
| Away | 29 | 12.79 | 5.07 | 1.38 | 1.66 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.17 |
| Home − Away | — | +3.0 | +2.3 | +0.6 | +0.7 | +0.4 | +0.2 | -0.0 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | high |
| minutes | 4 | 15.5 | 22 | 14.37 | high |
| points | 1 | 5 | 10 | 6.27 | high |
| rebounds | 0 | 1.5 | 3 | 1.68 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES11.7% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS11.7%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-10 | vs PHI | 27 | 11.15 | +142.1% | 16 | 6/15 | 4/7 | 2/8 | 2/3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | 49% |
| 2026-03-29 | vs MIA | 20 | 8.03 | +148.9% | 10 | 5/6 | 5/6 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -10.0 | 83% |
| 2026-03-27 | vs LAC | 13 | 8.23 | +58% | 7 | 3/5 | 2/4 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +4.0 | 70% |
| 2026-03-25 | vs LAL | 7 | 9.31 | -24.8% | 0 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -14.0 | 0% |
| 2026-03-21 | @ SAS | 16 | 7.56 | +111.7% | 6 | 2/5 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1/1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +1.0 | 55% |
| 2026-03-18 | vs POR | 20 | 7.99 | +150.2% | 13 | 5/7 | 5/7 | 0/0 | 3/3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0 | 78% |
| 2026-03-08 | @ POR | 17 | 8.09 | +110.2% | 2 | 1/5 | 1/3 | 0/2 | 0/0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -12.0 | 20% |
| 2026-03-06 | @ LAL | 18 | 5.84 | +208.2% | 8 | 3/6 | 3/4 | 0/2 | 2/2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -12.0 | 58% |
| 2026-03-04 | @ LAC | 18 | 2.57 | +599.7% | 11 | 3/7 | 1/3 | 2/4 | 3/3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -7.0 | 66% |
| 2026-01-26 | @ ATL | 1 | — | — | 3 | 1/2 | 1/1 | 0/1 | 1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.0 | 52% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS4.2%1/24 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/24 games
5+ ASSISTS16.7%4/24 games
2+ THREES33.3%8/24 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | IND | 24 | 49.8 | #111 / 409 | 12.6M | Rotation |
| 2024–25 | IND | 27 | 44.4 | #201 / 422 | 8.9M | Depth |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2025–26
AF-PLAYER49.8descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#111of 409 ranked
PH$12.6MRotation
SAMPLE24observed games
Ball security64
Box defence30
Creation64
Efficiency53
Rebounding30
Scoring49
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE+43.9 ppAF-Player pct − Expected Minutes pct
AF MOVEMENT+20.6 pp2024–25 → 2025–26
ROLE CHANGESTABLE-0.6 min vs latest observed MPG
STAR DEPENDENCY—governed What If sample unavailable
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
IND
Indiana Pacers
EXPECTED MIN8.9
SCORING SHARE8.0%
CREATION SHARE10.1%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR54.0%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.