CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE

Ousmane Dieng

Milwaukee Bucks current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.

Milwaukee Bucks · current teamF

AF-PLAYER33.92025–26

NBA RANK#339of 409

PH$6.5MDepth · fictional game currency

STATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status

EXPECTED MIN22.3governed role

NEXT GAME@ Washington Wizards2026-10-21 WHAT IF IMPACT+0.1 ppteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual

REGULAR-SEASON GAMES157

Player-safe accepted corpus.

CAREER PPG · CORPUS5.0

2019–20 through 2025–26 window.

CAREER RPG · CORPUS2.3

Historical window, not full NBA career.

CAREER APG · CORPUS1.3

Historical window, not full NBA career.

LATEST COMPLETED SEASON

2025–26

48 games

MIN17.3

PTS6.8

REB2.6

AST1.9

STL0.4

BLK0.3

3PM1.1

FG%42.9%

3P%36.4%

FT%76.9%

+/--2.3

NEXT GAME

Current context

2026–27 · Milwaukee Bucks

Assigned schedule

NBA Official roster

2026-10-21 · AWAY@ Washington Wizards45.0% winProjected 114–115

2026-10-23 · HOMEvs Chicago Bulls57.9% winProjected 113–115

2026-10-24 · AWAY@ Philadelphia 76ers33.3% winProjected 112–116

2026-10-26 · HOMEvs Indiana Pacers49.6% winProjected 113–115

2026-10-28 · HOMEvs Houston Rockets41.1% winProjected 113–113

E66 · PLAYER PROJECTION

Loading next-game projection…

PTS / REB / AST / 3PM use a separately validated player-stat model. Game Win, projected team score, Form and milestones keep their own authorities.

Current team Open Player What If

MINUTES + FORM

Role-adjusted performance

CURRENT FORM · 2026–27

Waiting for completed player boxscores

PRESEASON / NO SAMPLE

ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.

LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26

Historical Minutes Intelligence

DESCRIPTIVE · NOT CURRENT

Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.

LATEST ACTUAL0minutes

EXPECTED29.56pregame reference

DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown

LAST 5

ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST

ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G5.4 PTS · 3.6 REB · 2.6 AST

LAST 10

ALL OBSERVED10 G5.5 PTS · 1.5 REB · 1.9 AST

ROLE-CONSISTENT9 G4.56 PTS · 2.56 REB · 1.67 AST

creation↑

efficiency↓

minutes→

rebounding↑

scoring→

MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.

SPLITS + EFFICIENCY

How the production is built

EFFICIENCY

Shooting, derived from the box score

CAREER · 157 GAMES

2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.

FIELD GOALS42.6%305/716

2-POINT54.8%183/334

3-POINT31.9%122/382

FREE THROW74.1%60/81

EFFECTIVE FG%51.1%

TRUE SHOOTING%52.7%

AST / TO1.88

PTS PER 3613.13rate, not projection

HOME / AWAY

Where the games were played

85 HOME · 72 AWAY

Split	G	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	3PM	STL	BLK
Home	85	15.07	5.33	2.6	1.45	0.8	0.45	0.18
Away	72	12.36	4.71	1.99	1.11	0.75	0.29	0.25
Home − Away	—	+2.7	+0.6	+0.6	+0.3	+0.1	+0.2	-0.1

Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.

CONSISTENCY

What the average hides

157 GAMES

Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.

Category	Floor	Median	Ceiling	Mean	Volatility
assists	0	1	2	1.29	high
minutes	6	11	21	13.83	high
points	0	3	9	5.04	high
rebounds	1	2	4	2.32	high

Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.

DOUBLE-DOUBLES

Observed frequency across the corpus

157 GAMES

DOUBLE-DOUBLES31.9% of games

TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games

10+ ASSISTS10.6%

10+ BLOCKS00.0%

Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.

GAME LOG · 2025–26

One log, the window you choose

10 games

Date	Opp	MIN	EXP MIN	MIN Δ	PTS	FG	2P	3P	FT	OR	DR	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	+/-	TS%
2026-04-01	@ HOU	45	28.87	+55.8%	36	15/31	14/24	1/7	5/5	1	6	7	10	1	0	5	1	-11.0	54%
2026-03-29	vs LAC	22	26.46	-16.9%	7	3/8	3/4	0/4	1/2	0	2	2	4	1	0	3	6	-5.0	39%
2026-03-28	vs SAS	36	23.66	+52.1%	12	5/14	4/10	1/4	1/1	0	6	6	5	4	0	4	1	-16.0	42%
2026-03-25	@ POR	33	23.77	+38.8%	16	7/17	5/11	2/6	0/0	2	2	4	4	0	1	4	3	-28.0	47%
2026-03-21	@ PHX	33	21.72	+51.9%	11	5/11	4/8	1/3	0/0	0	2	2	2	1	0	2	1	-2.0	50%
2026-03-17	vs CLE	30	21.29	+40.9%	19	7/12	2/4	5/8	0/2	0	5	5	1	1	0	2	4	+2.0	74%
2026-03-12	@ MIA	14	27.55	-49.2%	0	0/2	0/2	0/0	0/0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	2	-24.0	0%
2026-03-10	vs PHX	37	25.04	+47.8%	12	5/8	3/4	2/4	0/0	3	7	10	4	1	0	1	3	-8.0	75%
2026-03-08	vs ORL	25	23.77	+5.2%	2	1/7	1/5	0/2	0/0	1	3	4	5	1	1	1	2	-29.0	14%
2026-03-07	vs UTA	32	21.09	+51.7%	11	4/8	1/2	3/6	0/0	0	8	8	9	0	0	2	1	+18.0	69%

All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.

HISTORY

Season and milestone evidence

DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26

How often did the threshold occur?

historical frequency

These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.

20+ POINTS2.1%1/48 games

10+ REBOUNDS4.2%2/48 games

5+ ASSISTS10.4%5/48 games

2+ THREES25.0%12/48 games

SEASON HISTORY

Regular-season production

accepted player-safe games

Season	Team(s)	G	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	FG%	3P%	FT%
2025–26	OKC MIL	48	17.3	6.8	2.6	1.9	42.9%	36.4%	76.9%
2024–25	OKC	37	11.0	3.8	2.2	0.8	43.2%	32.4%	68.8%
2023–24	OKC	33	11.1	4.0	1.6	1.1	42.2%	30.0%	87.5%
2022–23	OKC	39	14.6	5.0	2.7	1.2	42.0%	26.5%	65.2%

AF-PLAYER HISTORY

Season by season

Season	Team	G	AF-Player	Rank	PH$	Band
2025–26	OKC	48	33.9	#339 / 409	6.5M	Depth
2024–25	OKC	46	37.5	#304 / 422	6.7M	Depth
2023–24	OKC	37	34.6	#340 / 409	5.9M	Depth
2022–23	OKC	40	30.5	#369 / 408	5.6M	Depth

PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.

CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY

Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.

governed identity

Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.

Open team profile

IMPACT

Rating and role context

AF-PLAYER

Measured production, 2025–26

#339 OF 409

AF-PLAYER33.9descriptive index, not a win probability

NBA RANK#339of 409 ranked

PH$6.5MDepth

SAMPLE48observed games

Ball security

Box defence

Creation

Efficiency

Rebounding

Scoring

PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.

E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE

Distinct signals, side by side

descriptive · current role + historical rating

Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.

VALUE OVER ROLE-28.5 ppAF-Player pct − Expected Minutes pct

AF MOVEMENT-10.9 pp2024–25 → 2025–26

ROLE CHANGEEXPANDING+5.0 min vs latest observed MPG

STAR DEPENDENCY15+0.1 pp next-game What If impact

Player movement Opportunities Compare players

Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.

PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26

Pregame role and with/without context

descriptive · not causal

Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.

OKC

Oklahoma City Thunder

EXPECTED MIN5.7

SCORING SHARE3.0%

CREATION SHARE3.5%

PARTICIPATION PRIOR53.2%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.

MIL

Milwaukee Bucks

EXPECTED MIN20.4

SCORING SHARE8.0%

CREATION SHARE7.8%

PARTICIPATION PRIOR82.2%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.