PROBHOOPS · NBA ANALYTICS · TEAMS · PLAYERS · PROBABILITIES
FIND ANYTHING

Teams & players

Start typing to search the ProbHoops directory.

Tip: press / anywhere to search.

PLAYER PROFILE · HISTORICAL

Marvin Williams

Accepted historical regular-season production. No current 2026–27 roster status is inferred.

Milwaukee Bucks · last observed teamUSANorth Carolina
AF-PLAYER39.52019–20
NBA RANK#234of 385
PH$9.9MDepth · fictional game currency
STATUSHistoricalno current binding
EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported
NEXT GAMENo assigned gameSchedule pendingWHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual
REGULAR-SEASON GAMES58

Player-safe accepted corpus.

CAREER PPG · CORPUS5.9

2019–20 through 2025–26 window.

CAREER RPG · CORPUS3.2

Historical window, not full NBA career.

CAREER APG · CORPUS1.0

Historical window, not full NBA career.

LATEST COMPLETED SEASON

2019–20

58 games
MIN19.5
PTS5.9
REB3.2
AST1.0
STL0.6
BLK0.5
3PM1.0
FG%44.6%
3P%35.9%
FT%86.0%
+/--1.4

NEXT GAME

Current context

No current roster binding is published for this historical profile. ProbHoops does not infer a current team, availability or expected minutes from historical data.

MINUTES + FORM

Role-adjusted performance

Current form is unavailable because this historical profile is not bound to the governed 2026–27 roster. No current role is inferred.

LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2019–20

Historical Minutes Intelligence

DESCRIPTIVE · NOT CURRENT

Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.

LATEST ACTUAL9.8minutes
EXPECTED16.19pregame reference
DEVIATION-39.5%low minutes deviation

LAST 5

ALL OBSERVED5 G2.8 PTS · 4 REB · 0.6 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G3.8 PTS · 4 REB · 1.4 AST

LAST 10

ALL OBSERVED10 G3.4 PTS · 4.4 REB · 0.8 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G3.9 PTS · 2.9 REB · 1.3 AST

MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.

SPLITS + EFFICIENCY

How the production is built

EFFICIENCY

Shooting, derived from the box score

CAREER · 58 GAMES

2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.

FIELD GOALS44.6%119/267
2-POINT56.8%63/111
3-POINT35.9%56/156
FREE THROW86.0%49/57
EFFECTIVE FG%55.1%
TRUE SHOOTING%58.7%
AST / TO1.82
PTS PER 3610.94rate, not projection

HOME / AWAY

Where the games were played

25 HOME · 33 AWAY
SplitGMINPTSREBAST3PMSTLBLK
Home2520.096.963.440.960.960.680.64
Away3318.985.122.971.090.970.580.42
Home − Away—+1.1+1.8+0.5-0.1-0.0+0.1+0.2

Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.

CONSISTENCY

What the average hides

58 GAMES

Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.

CategoryFloorMedianCeilingMeanVolatility
assists0121.03high
minutes15.519.523.919.46low
points2595.91high
rebounds2353.17high

Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.

DOUBLE-DOUBLES

Observed frequency across the corpus

58 GAMES
DOUBLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%

Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.

GAME LOG · 2019–20

One log, the window you choose

10 games
DateOppMINEXP MINMIN ΔPTSFG2P3PFTORDRREBASTSTLBLKTOVPF+/-TS%
2020-08-13@ MEM9.816.19-39.5%52/21/11/10/003300000-1.0125%
2020-08-10vs TOR20.417.06+19.8%31/20/01/20/005520112+1.075%
2020-08-08@ DAL21.214.8+43%41/30/11/21/214510012+5.052%
2020-08-06vs MIA21.115.21+38.8%21/31/10/20/025701001-7.033%
2020-08-04vs BKN22.617.21+31.4%62/31/11/21/133610222+17.087%
2020-08-02@ HOU23.1——42/52/20/30/045900112-2.040%
2020-03-08@ PHX25.917.75+45.6%51/30/11/22/205530104+11.064%
2020-03-06@ LAL20.316.59+22.5%52/31/11/20/004410004+1.083%
2020-03-04vs IND19.516.51+18.1%42/62/30/30/012320113-4.033%
2020-03-02@ MIA15.516.9-8.2%00/10/00/10/001110000-9.00%

All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.

HISTORY

Season and milestone evidence

DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2019–20

How often did the threshold occur?

historical frequency

These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.

20+ POINTS3.5%2/58 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/58 games
5+ ASSISTS0.0%0/58 games
2+ THREES24.1%14/58 games

SEASON HISTORY

Regular-season production

accepted player-safe games
SeasonTeam(s)GMINPTSREBASTFG%3P%FT%
2019–20CHAMIL5819.55.93.21.044.6%35.9%86.0%

CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY

No current roster binding for this historical profile

governed identity

This historical profile is not currently bound to the NBA Official 2026–27 roster product. ProbHoops does not infer a current team from historical data.

Open team profile

IMPACT

Rating and role context

AF-PLAYER

Measured production, 2019–20

#234 OF 385
AF-PLAYER39.5descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#234of 385 ranked
PH$9.9MDepth
SAMPLE74observed games
Ball security
71
Box defence
43
Creation
28
Efficiency
53
Rebounding
32
Scoring
17

PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.

PLAYER IMPACT · 2019–20

Pregame role and with/without context

descriptive · not causal

Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.

CHA

Charlotte Hornets

EXPECTED MIN14.3
SCORING SHARE6.4%
CREATION SHARE3.9%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR69.4%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.

MIL

Milwaukee Bucks

EXPECTED MIN15.3
SCORING SHARE3.8%
CREATION SHARE3.9%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR74.5%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.