PLAYER PROFILE · HISTORICAL

Kyle Guy

Accepted historical regular-season production. No current 2026–27 roster status is inferred.

Miami Heat · last observed teamUSAVirginia

AF-PLAYERPendingsample gate

NBA RANK—not ranked

PH$—pending · how PH$ works

STATUSHistoricalno current binding

EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported

NEXT GAMENo assigned gameSchedule pending WHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual

REGULAR-SEASON GAMES53

Player-safe accepted corpus.

CAREER PPG · CORPUS3.1

2019–20 through 2025–26 window.

CAREER RPG · CORPUS1.0

Historical window, not full NBA career.

CAREER APG · CORPUS0.9

Historical window, not full NBA career.

LATEST COMPLETED SEASON

2021–22

19 games

MIN9.8

PTS3.9

REB0.9

AST0.9

STL0.4

BLK0.1

3PM0.7

FG%40.0%

3P%35.0%

FT%66.7%

+/--2.5

NEXT GAME

Current context

No current roster binding is published for this historical profile. ProbHoops does not infer a current team, availability or expected minutes from historical data.

MINUTES + FORM

Role-adjusted performance

Current form is unavailable because this historical profile is not bound to the governed 2026–27 roster. No current role is inferred.

LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2021–22

Historical Minutes Intelligence

DESCRIPTIVE · NOT CURRENT

Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.

LATEST ACTUAL0minutes

EXPECTED0.66pregame reference

DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown

LAST 5

ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST

ROLE-CONSISTENT2 G6.5 PTS · 0 REB · 1 AST

LAST 10

ALL OBSERVED10 G0 PTS · 0.2 REB · 0 AST

ROLE-CONSISTENT2 G6.5 PTS · 0 REB · 1 AST

creation—

efficiency—

minutes—

rebounding—

scoring—

Form label withheld: insufficient role-consistent sample. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.

SPLITS + EFFICIENCY

How the production is built

EFFICIENCY

Shooting, derived from the box score

CAREER · 53 GAMES

2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.

FIELD GOALS36.1%57/158

2-POINT43.5%30/69

3-POINT30.3%27/89

FREE THROW75.0%24/32

EFFECTIVE FG%44.6%

TRUE SHOOTING%47.9%

AST / TO2.08

PTS PER 3613.8rate, not projection

HOME / AWAY

Where the games were played

23 HOME · 30 AWAY

Split	G	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	3PM	STL	BLK
Home	23	6.81	2.52	1.09	0.78	0.48	0.17	0
Away	30	9.12	3.57	0.93	1.07	0.53	0.3	0.03
Home − Away	—	-2.3	-1.1	+0.2	-0.3	-0.1	-0.1	-0.0

Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.

CONSISTENCY

What the average hides

53 GAMES

Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.

Category	Floor	Median	Ceiling	Mean	Volatility
assists	0	0	1.6	0.94	high
minutes	2.7	5.8	13.9	8.12	high
points	0	2	5	3.11	high
rebounds	0	0	2	1	high

Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.

DOUBLE-DOUBLES

Observed frequency across the corpus

53 GAMES

DOUBLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games

TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games

10+ ASSISTS00.0%

10+ BLOCKS00.0%

Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.

GAME LOG · 2021–22

One log, the window you choose

10 games

Date	Opp	MIN	EXP MIN	MIN Δ	PTS	FG	2P	3P	FT	OR	DR	REB	AST	STL	TOV	PF	+/-	TS%
2022-03-18	vs OKC	3.1	0.66	+363.4%	0	0/2	0/0	0/2	0/0	1	1	2	0	0	0	0	-5.0	0%
2022-03-07	vs HOU	3.1	0.79	+296.7%	0	0/1	0/0	0/1	0/0	1	1	2	0	0	0	0	-3.0	0%
2022-03-05	vs PHI	1.2	0.92	+27.2%	0	0/1	0/0	0/1	0/0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	0%
2022-02-28	vs CHI	3.3	0.52	+535.6%	1	0/1	0/0	0/1	1/2	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	-7.0	27%
2022-02-10	@ NOP	0.5	6.39	-92.2%	0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	—
2022-02-07	@ WAS	7	5.74	+21.2%	4	1/3	1/3	0/0	2/3	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	-11.0	46%
2022-02-05	@ CHA	3.1	5.32	-41.8%	0	0/1	0/0	0/1	0/0	0	0	0	1	2	1	0	-7.0	0%
2022-02-03	@ SAS	7	4.57	+52.3%	3	1/3	0/1	1/2	0/0	1	1	2	0	0	0	1	-7.0	50%
2022-01-31	@ BOS	18.2	4.17	+336.1%	4	1/5	0/2	1/3	1/2	0	1	1	0	0	4	0	-5.0	34%
2022-01-26	vs NYK	2.1	8.65	-75.3%	0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	-3.0	—

All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.

HISTORY

Season and milestone evidence

DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2021–22

How often did the threshold occur?

historical frequency

These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.

20+ POINTS0.0%0/19 games

10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/19 games

5+ ASSISTS0.0%0/19 games

2+ THREES10.5%2/19 games

SEASON HISTORY

Regular-season production

accepted player-safe games

Season	Team(s)	G	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	FG%	3P%	FT%
2021–22	MIA	19	9.8	3.9	0.9	0.9	40.0%	35.0%	66.7%
2020–21	SAC	31	7.6	2.8	1.1	1.0	33.0%	28.3%	80.0%
2019–20	SAC	3	3.2	1.3	0.3	0.3	40.0%	0.0%	—

CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY

No current roster binding for this historical profile

governed identity

This historical profile is not currently bound to the NBA Official 2026–27 roster product. ProbHoops does not infer a current team from historical data.

Open team profile

IMPACT

Rating and role context

AF-PLAYER

Measured production, 2021–22

PENDING SAMPLE

ProbHoops has observed 32 games of this player in 2021–22 — below the sample floor required to rank. He carries no AF-Player and no PH$. Pending means not enough observation, never a low score.

PLAYER IMPACT · 2021–22

Pregame role and with/without context

descriptive · not causal

Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.

MIA

Miami Heat

EXPECTED MIN5.9

SCORING SHARE4.2%

CREATION SHARE4.4%

PARTICIPATION PRIOR54.5%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.