Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Kobe Brown
Indiana Pacers current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYER40.32025–26
NBA RANK#248of 409
PH$7.9MDepth · fictional game currencySTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MIN26.8governed role
NEXT GAME@ New Orleans Pelicans2026-10-21WHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN11.7
PTS4.2
REB1.9
AST1.0
STL0.3
BLK0.2
3PM0.6
FG%45.0%
3P%33.8%
FT%80.6%
+/--1.2
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · Indiana Pacers
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED16.74pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G1.4 PTS · 0.6 REB · 0.6 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G3.2 PTS · 2 REB · 0.6 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G3.6 PTS · 1.1 REB · 1.2 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT6 G2.67 PTS · 1.83 REB · 0.5 AST
creation↑
efficiency→
minutes→
rebounding→
scoring↑
MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS44.0%132/300
2-POINT58.5%86/147
3-POINT30.1%46/153
FREE THROW77.8%35/45
EFFECTIVE FG%51.7%
TRUE SHOOTING%53.9%
AST / TO2.07
PTS PER 3610.71rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 67 | 10.58 | 3.18 | 1.84 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.33 | 0.19 |
| Away | 56 | 8.05 | 2.36 | 1.48 | 0.59 | 0.34 | 0.2 | 0.09 |
| Home − Away | — | +2.5 | +0.8 | +0.4 | +0.3 | +0.1 | +0.1 | +0.1 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.76 | high |
| minutes | 3 | 7 | 15.6 | 9.43 | high |
| points | 0 | 2 | 5.6 | 2.8 | high |
| rebounds | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1.67 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-10 | vs PHI | 27 | 16.71 | +61.5% | 7 | 3/7 | 2/3 | 1/4 | 0/0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -7.0 | 50% |
| 2026-03-29 | vs MIA | 33 | 15.67 | +110.6% | 18 | 7/11 | 4/5 | 3/6 | 1/1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | +23.0 | 79% |
| 2026-03-27 | vs LAC | 27 | 14.34 | +88.2% | 11 | 4/8 | 3/4 | 1/4 | 2/2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +5.0 | 62% |
| 2026-03-25 | vs LAL | 8 | 14.88 | -46.2% | 0 | 0/2 | 0/0 | 0/2 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -1.0 | 0% |
| 2026-03-21 | @ SAS | 13 | 19.08 | -31.9% | 9 | 3/5 | 0/1 | 3/4 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +11.0 | 90% |
| 2026-03-18 | vs POR | 20 | 18.89 | +5.9% | 8 | 3/3 | 1/1 | 2/2 | 0/0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | +11.0 | 133% |
| 2026-03-13 | vs NYK | 30 | 17.1 | +75.5% | 8 | 2/7 | 2/4 | 0/3 | 4/5 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +4.0 | 44% |
| 2026-03-08 | @ POR | 20 | 15.48 | +29.2% | 8 | 3/6 | 1/3 | 2/3 | 0/0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3.0 | 67% |
| 2026-03-06 | @ LAL | 10 | 20.39 | -50.9% | 8 | 3/3 | 2/2 | 1/1 | 1/2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -4.0 | 103% |
| 2026-03-04 | @ LAC | 22 | — | — | 5 | 2/4 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -12.0 | 63% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS0.0%0/43 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/43 games
5+ ASSISTS2.3%1/43 games
2+ THREES16.3%7/43 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | LAC | 44 | 40.3 | #248 / 409 | 7.9M | Depth |
| 2023–24 | LAC | 47 | 26.5 | #397 / 409 | 5.3M | Depth |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2025–26
AF-PLAYER40.3descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#248of 409 ranked
PH$7.9MDepth
SAMPLE44observed games
Ball security57
Box defence30
Creation35
Efficiency51
Rebounding36
Scoring28
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE-17.5 ppAF-Player pct − Expected Minutes pct
AF MOVEMENT—two eligible completed seasons required
ROLE CHANGEEXPANDING+15.4 min vs latest observed MPG
STAR DEPENDENCY—governed What If sample unavailable
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
IND
Indiana Pacers
EXPECTED MIN16.9
SCORING SHARE6.2%
CREATION SHARE3.8%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR74.0%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.
LAC
LA Clippers
EXPECTED MIN5.2
SCORING SHARE2.5%
CREATION SHARE3.3%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR58.1%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.