Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Josh Hart
New York Knicks current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYER46.72025–26
NBA RANK#150of 409
PH$17.9MCore · fictional game currencySTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MIN42.0governed role
NEXT GAMEvs Philadelphia 76ers2026-10-20WHAT IF IMPACT-1.8 ppteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN30.3
PTS11.8
REB7.3
AST4.7
STL1.1
BLK0.3
3PM1.5
FG%49.6%
3P%39.7%
FT%71.9%
+/-+2.5
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · New York Knicks
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED30.76pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G6.2 PTS · 2 REB · 1.6 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G10.4 PTS · 4.2 REB · 2.4 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G8.5 PTS · 3.6 REB · 2 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G11.4 PTS · 6 REB · 3.6 AST
creation↓
efficiency↓
minutes→
rebounding↓
scoring↓
COLD historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS48.2%1901/3944
2-POINT58.1%1330/2290
3-POINT34.5%571/1654
FREE THROW75.9%777/1024
EFFECTIVE FG%55.4%
TRUE SHOOTING%58.6%
AST / TO2.41
PTS PER 3612.58rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 229 | 31.83 | 11.52 | 8.2 | 3.83 | 1.21 | 1.13 | 0.29 |
| Away | 230 | 32.38 | 10.92 | 7.64 | 4 | 1.28 | 1.09 | 0.3 |
| Home − Away | — | -0.6 | +0.6 | +0.6 | -0.2 | -0.1 | +0.0 | -0.0 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 2 | 3 | 6 | 3.91 | high |
| minutes | 26.2 | 32 | 38 | 32.11 | low |
| points | 6 | 11 | 16 | 11.22 | high |
| rebounds | 5 | 7 | 11 | 7.92 | medium |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES10623.1% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES163.5% of games
10+ ASSISTS214.6%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-10 | vs TOR | 30 | 31.12 | -3.6% | 3 | 0/2 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 3/4 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | +11.0 | 40% |
| 2026-04-09 | vs BOS | 35 | 31.53 | +11% | 26 | 10/15 | 5/8 | 5/7 | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | +6.0 | 82% |
| 2026-04-06 | @ ATL | 31 | 30.88 | +0.4% | 2 | 1/3 | 1/1 | 0/2 | 0/0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | -3.0 | 33% |
| 2026-03-31 | @ HOU | 29 | 27.07 | +7.1% | 13 | 5/12 | 4/6 | 1/6 | 2/2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | -22.0 | 51% |
| 2026-03-29 | @ OKC | 34 | 26.36 | +29% | 15 | 5/9 | 0/2 | 5/7 | 0/0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | -12.0 | 83% |
| 2026-03-26 | @ CHA | 39 | 21.11 | +84.7% | 16 | 7/11 | 5/7 | 2/4 | 0/0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -15.0 | 73% |
| 2026-03-24 | vs NOP | 38 | 20.71 | +83.5% | 10 | 3/8 | 3/8 | 0/0 | 4/5 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | -14.0 | 49% |
| 2026-03-22 | vs WAS | 28 | 19.94 | +40.4% | 16 | 5/9 | 2/6 | 3/3 | 3/3 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +24.0 | 78% |
| 2026-03-15 | vs GSW | 31 | 23.17 | +33.8% | 7 | 3/6 | 2/5 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | +17.0 | 58% |
| 2026-03-09 | @ LAC | 37 | 26.71 | +38.5% | 12 | 5/7 | 4/4 | 1/3 | 1/1 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | -13.0 | 81% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS11.3%7/62 games
10+ REBOUNDS25.8%16/62 games
5+ ASSISTS50.0%31/62 games
2+ THREES37.1%23/62 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
| Season | Team(s) | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | NYK | 62 | 30.3 | 11.8 | 7.3 | 4.7 | 49.6% | 39.7% | 71.9% |
| 2024–25 | NYK | 75 | 37.7 | 13.6 | 9.7 | 5.9 | 52.7% | 33.3% | 77.5% |
| 2023–24 | NYK | 81 | 33.4 | 9.4 | 8.3 | 4.1 | 43.4% | 31.0% | 79.1% |
| 2022–23 | NYKPOR | 76 | 32.3 | 9.8 | 7.8 | 3.8 | 52.9% | 37.2% | 75.0% |
| 2021–22 | NOPPOR | 54 | 33.2 | 14.9 | 7.2 | 4.2 | 50.4% | 34.3% | 75.8% |
| 2020–21 | NOP | 46 | 28.8 | 9.3 | 8.1 | 2.4 | 43.9% | 33.2% | 77.5% |
| 2019–20 | NOP | 65 | 27.0 | 10.1 | 6.5 | 1.7 | 42.3% | 34.2% | 73.9% |
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | NYK | 82 | 46.7 | #150 / 409 | 17.9M | Core |
| 2024–25 | NYK | 93 | 53.7 | #80 / 422 | 23.7M | Core |
| 2023–24 | NYK | 94 | 35.5 | #328 / 409 | 9.9M | Depth |
| 2022–23 | NYK | 87 | 45.9 | #166 / 408 | 17.1M | Core |
| 2021–22 | POR | 54 | 51.7 | #92 / 423 | 19.3M | Core |
| 2020–21 | NOP | 46 | 43.5 | #198 / 410 | 12M | Rotation |
| 2019–20 | NOP | 65 | 40.3 | #220 / 385 | 11.8M | Rotation |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2025–26
AF-PLAYER46.7descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#150of 409 ranked
PH$17.9MCore
SAMPLE82observed games
Ball security36
Box defence40
Creation63
Efficiency51
Rebounding48
Scoring29
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE-31.7 ppAF-Player pct − Expected Minutes pct
AF MOVEMENT-17.8 pp2024–25 → 2025–26
ROLE CHANGEEXPANDING+11.3 min vs latest observed MPG
STAR DEPENDENCY71-1.8 pp next-game What If impact
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
NYK
New York Knicks
EXPECTED MIN25.6
SCORING SHARE9.8%
CREATION SHARE17.5%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR76.2%
+7.36 residual margin pts in the qualified normal-load vs nonparticipation diagnostic · 55 normal-load / 6 nonparticipation games.