PROBHOOPS · NBA ANALYTICS · TEAMS · PLAYERS · PROBABILITIES
FIND ANYTHING

Teams & players

Start typing to search the ProbHoops directory.

Tip: press / anywhere to search.

PLAYER PROFILE · HISTORICAL

Jahmi'us Ramsey

Accepted historical regular-season production. No current 2026–27 roster status is inferred.

Toronto Raptors · last observed teamUSATexas Tech
AF-PLAYERPendingsample gate
NBA RANK—not ranked
PH$—pending · how PH$ works
STATUSHistoricalno current binding
EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported
NEXT GAMENo assigned gameSchedule pendingWHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual
REGULAR-SEASON GAMES39

Player-safe accepted corpus.

CAREER PPG · CORPUS3.8

2019–20 through 2025–26 window.

CAREER RPG · CORPUS1.1

Historical window, not full NBA career.

CAREER APG · CORPUS0.5

Historical window, not full NBA career.

LATEST COMPLETED SEASON

2023–24

7 games
MIN17.1
PTS6.7
REB3.1
AST1.1
STL1.0
BLK0.0
3PM0.9
FG%43.9%
3P%27.3%
FT%83.3%
+/--4.0

NEXT GAME

Current context

No current roster binding is published for this historical profile. ProbHoops does not infer a current team, availability or expected minutes from historical data.

MINUTES + FORM

Role-adjusted performance

Current form is unavailable because this historical profile is not bound to the governed 2026–27 roster. No current role is inferred.

LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2023–24

Historical Minutes Intelligence

DESCRIPTIVE · NOT CURRENT

Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.

LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED0.92pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown

LAST 5

ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT1 G8 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST

LAST 10

ALL OBSERVED10 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT1 G8 PTS · 4 REB · 1 AST

Form label withheld: insufficient role-consistent sample. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.

SPLITS + EFFICIENCY

How the production is built

EFFICIENCY

Shooting, derived from the box score

CAREER · 39 GAMES

2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.

FIELD GOALS41.6%57/137
2-POINT52.6%41/78
3-POINT27.1%16/59
FREE THROW68.0%17/25
EFFECTIVE FG%47.4%
TRUE SHOOTING%49.7%
AST / TO1.4
PTS PER 3615.19rate, not projection

HOME / AWAY

Where the games were played

21 HOME · 18 AWAY
SplitGMINPTSREBAST3PMSTLBLK
Home218.343.861.140.670.380.290.05
Away189.623.671.170.390.440.330.06
Home − Away—-1.3+0.2-0.0+0.3-0.1-0.0-0.0

Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.

CONSISTENCY

What the average hides

39 GAMES

Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.

CategoryFloorMedianCeilingMeanVolatility
assists0010.54high
minutes2.55.118.48.93high
points0273.77high
rebounds002.41.15high

Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.

DOUBLE-DOUBLES

Observed frequency across the corpus

39 GAMES
DOUBLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%

Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.

GAME LOG · 2023–24

One log, the window you choose

7 games
DateOppMINEXP MINMIN ΔPTSFG2P3PFTORDRREBASTSTLBLKTOVPF+/-TS%
2024-03-23@ WAS1816.27+10.6%83/51/12/40/004410002+9.080%
2024-03-22vs OKC1913.69+38.8%73/72/31/40/000022024-11.050%
2024-03-20vs SAC2210.25+114.6%115/84/51/30/003311020-21.069%
2024-03-17@ ORL197.31+159.7%52/61/21/40/010122031+7.042%
2024-03-15vs ORL185.03+258.2%103/52/31/23/414511002+5.074%
2024-03-13@ DET191.43+1224.8%41/71/30/42/216701001-10.025%
2024-03-05vs NOP5——21/31/20/10/011210000-7.033%

All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.

HISTORY

Season and milestone evidence

DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2023–24

How often did the threshold occur?

historical frequency

These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.

20+ POINTS0.0%0/7 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/7 games
5+ ASSISTS0.0%0/7 games
2+ THREES14.3%1/7 games

SEASON HISTORY

Regular-season production

accepted player-safe games
SeasonTeam(s)GMINPTSREBASTFG%3P%FT%
2023–24TOR717.16.73.11.143.9%27.3%83.3%
2021–22SAC197.03.20.70.441.4%27.8%50.0%
2020–21SAC137.33.10.80.539.5%26.3%100.0%

CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY

No current roster binding for this historical profile

governed identity

This historical profile is not currently bound to the NBA Official 2026–27 roster product. ProbHoops does not infer a current team from historical data.

Open team profile

IMPACT

Rating and role context

AF-PLAYER

Measured production, 2023–24

PENDING SAMPLE

ProbHoops has observed 7 games of this player in 2023–24 — below the sample floor required to rank. He carries no AF-Player and no PH$. Pending means not enough observation, never a low score.

PLAYER IMPACT · 2023–24

Pregame role and with/without context

descriptive · not causal

Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.

TOR

Toronto Raptors

EXPECTED MIN6.7
SCORING SHARE5.4%
CREATION SHARE4.4%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR48.9%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.