PROBHOOPS · NBA ANALYTICS · TEAMS · PLAYERS · PROBABILITIES
FIND ANYTHING

Teams & players

Start typing to search the ProbHoops directory.

Tip: press / anywhere to search.

PLAYER PROFILE · HISTORICAL

Jacob Evans

Accepted historical regular-season production. No current 2026–27 roster status is inferred.

Minnesota Timberwolves · last observed teamUSACincinnati
AF-PLAYER25.42019–20
NBA RANK#372of 385
PH$5.3MDepth · fictional game currency
STATUSHistoricalno current binding
EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported
NEXT GAMENo assigned gameSchedule pendingWHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual
REGULAR-SEASON GAMES29

Player-safe accepted corpus.

CAREER PPG · CORPUS4.4

2019–20 through 2025–26 window.

CAREER RPG · CORPUS1.4

Historical window, not full NBA career.

CAREER APG · CORPUS1.1

Historical window, not full NBA career.

LATEST COMPLETED SEASON

2019–20

29 games
MIN14.4
PTS4.4
REB1.4
AST1.1
STL0.4
BLK0.4
3PM0.5
FG%33.6%
3P%33.3%
FT%86.2%
+/--3.5

NEXT GAME

Current context

No current roster binding is published for this historical profile. ProbHoops does not infer a current team, availability or expected minutes from historical data.

MINUTES + FORM

Role-adjusted performance

Current form is unavailable because this historical profile is not bound to the governed 2026–27 roster. No current role is inferred.

LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2019–20

Historical Minutes Intelligence

DESCRIPTIVE · NOT CURRENT

Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.

LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED0.59pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown

LAST 5

ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G3.6 PTS · 1 REB · 1.6 AST

LAST 10

ALL OBSERVED10 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT9 G2.78 PTS · 0.89 REB · 1.33 AST

HOT historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.

SPLITS + EFFICIENCY

How the production is built

EFFICIENCY

Shooting, derived from the box score

CAREER · 29 GAMES

2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.

FIELD GOALS33.6%45/134
2-POINT33.7%32/95
3-POINT33.3%13/39
FREE THROW86.2%25/29
EFFECTIVE FG%38.4%
TRUE SHOOTING%43.6%
AST / TO1.24
PTS PER 3611.02rate, not projection

HOME / AWAY

Where the games were played

14 HOME · 15 AWAY
SplitGMINPTSREBAST3PMSTLBLK
Home1413.013.571.2910.50.290.21
Away1515.735.21.531.130.40.470.6
Home − Away—-2.7-1.6-0.2-0.1+0.1-0.2-0.4

Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.

CONSISTENCY

What the average hides

29 GAMES

Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.

CategoryFloorMedianCeilingMeanVolatility
assists0121.07high
minutes7.913.819.614.42medium
points0484.41high
rebounds0121.41high

Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.

DOUBLE-DOUBLES

Observed frequency across the corpus

29 GAMES
DOUBLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%

Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.

GAME LOG · 2019–20

One log, the window you choose

10 games
DateOppMINEXP MINMIN ΔPTSFG2P3PFTORDRREBASTSTLBLKTOVPF+/-TS%
2020-02-24@ DAL3.2——00/10/00/10/000000000+10.00%
2020-02-08vs LAC1.1——00/00/00/00/0000000000.0—
2020-02-05@ BKN23.710.89+117.8%84/84/40/40/013440002-5.050%
2020-02-03@ WAS25.79.74+163.8%71/80/51/34/411231304-8.036%
2020-02-01@ CLE13.87.86+75.1%63/33/30/00/001101000-13.0100%
2020-01-30@ BOS13.46.42+109%82/30/12/22/201101101-4.0103%
2020-01-28@ PHI7.35.89+23.7%21/21/20/00/000021002+1.050%
2020-01-22vs UTA18.97.17+163%42/52/30/20/000011122-9.040%
2020-01-14vs DAL7.3——00/10/10/00/001100001-4.00%
2020-01-12@ MEM17.8——83/91/62/30/010130022-13.044%

All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.

HISTORY

Season and milestone evidence

DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2019–20

How often did the threshold occur?

historical frequency

These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.

20+ POINTS0.0%0/29 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/29 games
5+ ASSISTS0.0%0/29 games
2+ THREES10.3%3/29 games

SEASON HISTORY

Regular-season production

accepted player-safe games
SeasonTeam(s)GMINPTSREBASTFG%3P%FT%
2019–20GSWMIN2914.44.41.41.133.6%33.3%86.2%

CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY

No current roster binding for this historical profile

governed identity

This historical profile is not currently bound to the NBA Official 2026–27 roster product. ProbHoops does not infer a current team from historical data.

Open team profile

IMPACT

Rating and role context

AF-PLAYER

Measured production, 2019–20

#372 OF 385
AF-PLAYER25.4descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#372of 385 ranked
PH$5.3MDepth
SAMPLE33observed games
Ball security
42
Box defence
39
Creation
29
Efficiency
17
Rebounding
18
Scoring
28

PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.

PLAYER IMPACT · 2019–20

Pregame role and with/without context

descriptive · not causal

Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.

GSW

Golden State Warriors

EXPECTED MIN9.3
SCORING SHARE4.9%
CREATION SHARE4.4%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR59.1%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.

MIN

Minnesota Timberwolves

EXPECTED MIN0.6
SCORING SHARE0.0%
CREATION SHARE0.0%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR39.5%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.