PROBHOOPS · NBA ANALYTICS · TEAMS · PLAYERS · PROBABILITIES
FIND ANYTHING

Teams & players

Start typing to search the ProbHoops directory.

Tip: press / anywhere to search.

CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE

Darius Garland

LA Clippers current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.

LA Clippers · current teamGUSAVanderbilt
REGULAR-SEASON GAMES414

Player-safe accepted corpus.

CAREER PPG · CORPUS19.0

2019–20 through 2025–26 window.

CAREER RPG · CORPUS2.6

Historical window, not full NBA career.

CAREER APG · CORPUS6.8

Historical window, not full NBA career.

LATEST COMPLETED SEASON

2025–26

40 games
MIN30.4
PTS18.8
REB2.5
AST6.8
STL0.9
BLK0.2
3PM2.7
FG%45.4%
3P%38.9%
FT%86.1%
+/-+0.8

NEXT GAME

Current context

2026–27 · LA Clippers

Assigned schedule

NBA Official roster
2026-10-21 · HOMEvs Sacramento Kings69.4% winProjected 112–117
2026-10-23 · AWAY@ Los Angeles Lakers38.4% winProjected 112–115
2026-10-25 · AWAY@ Oklahoma City Thunder31.4% winProjected 110–116
2026-10-28 · HOMEvs Los Angeles Lakers52.8% winProjected 112–115
2026-10-30 · AWAY@ Minnesota Timberwolves44.0% winProjected 112–115

E66 · PLAYER PROJECTION

Loading next-game projection…

LOADING

PTS / REB / AST / 3PM use a separately validated player-stat model. Game Win, projected team score, Form and milestones keep their own authorities.

MINUTES + FORM

Role-adjusted performance

CURRENT FORM · 2026–27

Waiting for completed player boxscores

PRESEASON / NO SAMPLE

ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.

LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26

Historical Minutes Intelligence

DESCRIPTIVE · NOT CURRENT

Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.

LATEST ACTUAL27minutes
EXPECTED26.37pregame reference
DEVIATION+2.4%role consistent

LAST 5

ALL OBSERVED5 G9.6 PTS · 2 REB · 3.8 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G16.2 PTS · 2.2 REB · 6.8 AST

LAST 10

ALL OBSERVED10 G14.8 PTS · 2 REB · 4.8 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G18.2 PTS · 1.8 REB · 6.8 AST

MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.

SPLITS + EFFICIENCY

How the production is built

EFFICIENCY

Shooting, derived from the box score

CAREER · 414 GAMES

2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.

FIELD GOALS45.4%2867/6314
2-POINT49.8%1874/3764
3-POINT38.9%993/2550
FREE THROW86.7%1123/1296
EFFECTIVE FG%53.3%
TRUE SHOOTING%57.0%
AST / TO2.27
PTS PER 3620.68rate, not projection

HOME / AWAY

Where the games were played

203 HOME · 211 AWAY
SplitGMINPTSREBAST3PMSTLBLK
Home20332.8519.482.526.792.521.060.09
Away21133.1618.462.756.722.281.210.16
Home − Away—-0.3+1.0-0.2+0.1+0.2-0.1-0.1

Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.

CONSISTENCY

What the average hides

414 GAMES

Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.

CategoryFloorMedianCeilingMeanVolatility
assists4796.75medium
minutes293337.633.01low
points13182518.96medium
rebounds1242.64high

Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.

DOUBLE-DOUBLES

Observed frequency across the corpus

414 GAMES
DOUBLE-DOUBLES7417.9% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES10.2% of games
10+ ASSISTS7417.9%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%

Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.

GAME LOG · 2025–26

One log, the window you choose

10 games
DateOppMINEXP MINMIN ΔPTSFG2P3PFTORDRREBASTSTLBLKTOVPF+/-TS%
2026-04-12vs GSW2726.37+2.4%156/175/121/52/201160012-9.042%
2026-04-10@ POR4124.17+69.6%165/163/82/84/414573033-2.045%
2026-04-05@ SAC2429.58-18.9%177/145/72/71/104461024+10.059%
2026-04-02vs SAS2930.35-4.5%115/174/91/80/202231113-19.031%
2026-03-31vs POR3724.59+50.5%207/174/93/83/302242154-7.055%
2026-03-29@ MIL2725.07+7.7%155/92/23/72/2022112050+19.076%
2026-03-27@ IND3523.98+45.9%3010/194/86/114/400050041+2.072%
2026-03-25vs TOR3019.93+50.5%249/164/75/91/213461132+12.071%
2026-03-21@ DAL3918.14+115%4115/247/128/123/3123111140+9.081%
2026-03-16vs SAS3217.15+86.6%259/215/124/93/3112102083-4.056%

All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.

HISTORY

Season and milestone evidence

DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26

How often did the threshold occur?

historical frequency

These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.

20+ POINTS45.0%18/40 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/40 games
5+ ASSISTS80.0%32/40 games
2+ THREES67.5%27/40 games

SEASON HISTORY

Regular-season production

accepted player-safe games
SeasonTeam(s)GMINPTSREBASTFG%3P%FT%
2025–26CLELAC4030.418.82.56.845.4%38.9%86.1%
2024–25CLE7230.820.82.96.847.4%40.6%88.2%
2023–24CLE5733.318.02.76.544.6%37.1%83.4%
2022–23CLE6935.521.62.77.846.2%41.0%86.3%
2021–22CLE6635.721.73.38.746.3%38.3%88.9%
2020–21CLE5433.117.42.46.145.1%39.5%84.9%
2019–20CLE5631.012.61.84.040.5%36.0%87.5%

AF-PLAYER HISTORY

Season by season

SeasonTeamGAF-PlayerRankPH$Band
2025–26LAC4150.5#103 / 40916.5MCore
2024–25CLE7758.6#36 / 42225.3MHigh Value
2023–24CLE6944.3#184 / 40915.2MCore
2022–23CLE7452.6#75 / 40822.8MCore
2021–22CLE6852.9#74 / 42322.8MCore
2020–21CLE5444.2#188 / 41014.1MRotation
2019–20CLE5629.2#343 / 3857.3MDepth

PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.

CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY

Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.

governed identity

Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.

Open team profile

IMPACT

Rating and role context

AF-PLAYER

Measured production, 2025–26

#103 OF 409
AF-PLAYER50.5descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#103of 409 ranked
PH$16.5MCore
SAMPLE41observed games
Ball security
47
Box defence
25
Creation
77
Efficiency
48
Rebounding
12
Scoring
74

PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.

E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE

Distinct signals, side by side

descriptive · current role + historical rating

Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.

VALUE OVER ROLE+21.0 ppAF-Player pct − Expected Minutes pct
AF MOVEMENT-16.7 pp2024–25 → 2025–26
ROLE CHANGECONTRACTING-4.3 min vs latest observed MPG
STAR DEPENDENCY65-0.9 pp next-game What If impact

Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.

PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26

Pregame role and with/without context

descriptive · not causal

Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.

CLE

Cleveland Cavaliers

EXPECTED MIN19.0
SCORING SHARE13.2%
CREATION SHARE21.5%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR61.6%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.

LAC

LA Clippers

EXPECTED MIN22.3
SCORING SHARE16.4%
CREATION SHARE26.2%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR67.2%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.