PROBHOOPS · NBA ANALYTICS · TEAMS · PLAYERS · PROBABILITIES
FIND ANYTHING

Teams & players

Start typing to search the ProbHoops directory.

Tip: press / anywhere to search.

PLAYER PROFILE · HISTORICAL

Caleb Swanigan

Accepted historical regular-season production. No current 2026–27 roster status is inferred.

Portland Trail Blazers · last observed teamUSAPurdue
AF-PLAYERPendingsample gate
NBA RANK—not ranked
PH$—pending · how PH$ works
STATUSHistoricalno current binding
EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported
NEXT GAMENo assigned gameSchedule pendingWHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual
REGULAR-SEASON GAMES27

Player-safe accepted corpus.

CAREER PPG · CORPUS2.4

2019–20 through 2025–26 window.

CAREER RPG · CORPUS3.7

Historical window, not full NBA career.

CAREER APG · CORPUS1.1

Historical window, not full NBA career.

LATEST COMPLETED SEASON

2019–20

27 games
MIN10.7
PTS2.4
REB3.7
AST1.1
STL0.1
BLK0.3
3PM0.0
FG%59.6%
3P%0.0%
FT%52.9%
+/--1.6

NEXT GAME

Current context

No current roster binding is published for this historical profile. ProbHoops does not infer a current team, availability or expected minutes from historical data.

MINUTES + FORM

Role-adjusted performance

Current form is unavailable because this historical profile is not bound to the governed 2026–27 roster. No current role is inferred.

LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2019–20

Historical Minutes Intelligence

DESCRIPTIVE · NOT CURRENT

Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.

LATEST ACTUAL11.18minutes
EXPECTED9.11pregame reference
DEVIATION+22.7%role consistent

LAST 5

ALL OBSERVED5 G0.8 PTS · 3.4 REB · 2.4 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G3.2 PTS · 3.8 REB · 1.2 AST

LAST 10

ALL OBSERVED10 G2.5 PTS · 3.2 REB · 1.5 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT8 G3.38 PTS · 4.38 REB · 1 AST

MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.

SPLITS + EFFICIENCY

How the production is built

EFFICIENCY

Shooting, derived from the box score

CAREER · 27 GAMES

2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.

FIELD GOALS59.6%28/47
2-POINT62.2%28/45
3-POINT—0/2
FREE THROW52.9%9/17
EFFECTIVE FG%59.6%
TRUE SHOOTING%59.7%
AST / TO0.84
PTS PER 368.12rate, not projection

HOME / AWAY

Where the games were played

14 HOME · 13 AWAY
SplitGMINPTSREBAST3PMSTLBLK
Home149.772.073.36100.070.14
Away1311.642.774.081.3100.150.38
Home − Away—-1.9-0.7-0.7-0.30.0-0.1-0.2

Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.

CONSISTENCY

What the average hides

27 GAMES

Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.

CategoryFloorMedianCeilingMeanVolatility
assists0121.15high
minutes4.110.513.710.67high
points024.82.41high
rebounds1.2353.7high

Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.

DOUBLE-DOUBLES

Observed frequency across the corpus

27 GAMES
DOUBLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%

Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.

GAME LOG · 2019–20

One log, the window you choose

10 games
DateOppMINEXP MINMIN ΔPTSFG2P3PFTORDRREBASTSTLBLKTOVPF+/-TS%
2020-03-10vs PHX11.29.11+22.7%00/00/00/00/014510011-1.0—
2020-03-07vs SAC5.810.64-45.8%00/00/00/00/002220000+12.0—
2020-03-06@ PHX3.911.67-66.3%00/00/00/00/001130021-5.0—
2020-03-04vs WAS10.511.11-5.3%00/00/00/00/004420036-8.0—
2020-03-02@ ORL15.510.15+52.5%42/22/20/00/005540134+16.0100%
2020-02-29@ ATL10.110.93-7.6%21/11/10/00/002211023+1.0100%
2020-02-27@ IND1312.19+6.3%63/43/40/00/032510012-3.075%
2020-02-25vs BOS10.312.35-16.9%82/22/20/04/512310013+3.095%
2020-02-21vs NOP8.916.4-45.4%52/22/20/01/214500012+7.087%
2020-02-12@ MEM12.517.76-29.7%21/21/20/00/021321114-7.050%

All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.

HISTORY

Season and milestone evidence

DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2019–20

How often did the threshold occur?

historical frequency

These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.

20+ POINTS0.0%0/27 games
10+ REBOUNDS7.4%2/27 games
5+ ASSISTS0.0%0/27 games
2+ THREES0.0%0/27 games

SEASON HISTORY

Regular-season production

accepted player-safe games
SeasonTeam(s)GMINPTSREBASTFG%3P%FT%
2019–20PORSAC2710.72.43.71.159.6%0.0%52.9%

CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY

No current roster binding for this historical profile

governed identity

This historical profile is not currently bound to the NBA Official 2026–27 roster product. ProbHoops does not infer a current team from historical data.

Open team profile

IMPACT

Rating and role context

AF-PLAYER

Measured production, 2019–20

PENDING SAMPLE

ProbHoops has observed 50 games of this player in 2019–20 — below the sample floor required to rank. He carries no AF-Player and no PH$. Pending means not enough observation, never a low score.

PLAYER IMPACT · 2019–20

Pregame role and with/without context

descriptive · not causal

Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.

POR

Portland Trail Blazers

EXPECTED MIN13.3
SCORING SHARE2.9%
CREATION SHARE6.4%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR81.1%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.

SAC

Sacramento Kings

EXPECTED MIN1.1
SCORING SHARE0.6%
CREATION SHARE0.4%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR36.4%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.