CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE

Bradley Beal

LA Clippers current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.

LA Clippers · current teamGUSAFlorida

AF-PLAYER47.92024–25

NBA RANK#153of 422

PH$15.2MCore · fictional game currency

STATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status

EXPECTED MIN0.0governed role

NEXT GAMEvs Sacramento Kings2026-10-21 WHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual

REGULAR-SEASON GAMES318

Player-safe accepted corpus.

CAREER PPG · CORPUS23.9

2019–20 through 2025–26 window.

CAREER RPG · CORPUS4.1

Historical window, not full NBA career.

CAREER APG · CORPUS5.1

Historical window, not full NBA career.

LATEST COMPLETED SEASON

2025–26

6 games

MIN20.2

PTS8.2

REB0.8

AST1.7

STL0.5

BLK0.0

3PM1.2

FG%37.5%

3P%36.8%

FT%75.0%

+/--3.8

NEXT GAME

Current context

2026–27 · LA Clippers

Assigned schedule

NBA Official roster

2026-10-21 · HOMEvs Sacramento Kings69.4% winProjected 112–117

2026-10-23 · AWAY@ Los Angeles Lakers38.4% winProjected 112–115

2026-10-25 · AWAY@ Oklahoma City Thunder31.4% winProjected 110–116

2026-10-28 · HOMEvs Los Angeles Lakers52.8% winProjected 112–115

2026-10-30 · AWAY@ Minnesota Timberwolves44.0% winProjected 112–115

E66 · PLAYER PROJECTION

Loading next-game projection…

PTS / REB / AST / 3PM use a separately validated player-stat model. Game Win, projected team score, Form and milestones keep their own authorities.

Current team Open Player What If

MINUTES + FORM

Role-adjusted performance

CURRENT FORM · 2026–27

Waiting for completed player boxscores

PRESEASON / NO SAMPLE

ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.

LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26

Historical Minutes Intelligence

DESCRIPTIVE · NOT CURRENT

Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.

LATEST ACTUAL0minutes

EXPECTED1.02pregame reference

DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown

LAST 5

ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST

ROLE-CONSISTENT1 G6 PTS · 1 REB · 2 AST

LAST 10

ALL OBSERVED10 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST

ROLE-CONSISTENT1 G6 PTS · 1 REB · 2 AST

creation—

efficiency—

minutes—

rebounding—

scoring—

Form label withheld: insufficient role-consistent sample. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.

SPLITS + EFFICIENCY

How the production is built

EFFICIENCY

Shooting, derived from the box score

CAREER · 318 GAMES

2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.

FIELD GOALS48.2%2791/5792

2-POINT53.5%2139/3995

3-POINT36.3%652/1797

FREE THROW84.8%1373/1620

EFFECTIVE FG%53.8%

TRUE SHOOTING%58.5%

AST / TO1.8

PTS PER 3625.2rate, not projection

HOME / AWAY

Where the games were played

153 HOME · 165 AWAY

Split	G	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	3PM	STL	BLK
Home	153	33.87	23.32	4.17	4.95	2.03	1.02	0.52
Away	165	34.45	24.48	4.12	5.18	2.07	1.09	0.41
Home − Away	—	-0.6	-1.2	+0.1	-0.2	-0.0	-0.1	+0.1

Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.

CONSISTENCY

What the average hides

318 GAMES

Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.

Category	Floor	Median	Ceiling	Mean	Volatility
assists	3	5	7	5.07	high
minutes	30.3	35.2	38.5	34.17	low
points	15	24	33	23.92	medium
rebounds	2	4	6	4.14	high

Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.

DOUBLE-DOUBLES

Observed frequency across the corpus

318 GAMES

DOUBLE-DOUBLES226.9% of games

TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games

10+ ASSISTS175.3%

10+ BLOCKS00.0%

Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.

GAME LOG · 2025–26

One log, the window you choose

6 games

Date	Opp	MIN	EXP MIN	MIN Δ	PTS	FG	2P	3P	FT	OR	DR	REB	AST	STL	TOV	PF	+/-	TS%
2025-11-08	vs PHX	20	12.54	+59.4%	12	4/9	2/5	2/4	2/2	0	0	0	3	1	1	1	+4.0	61%
2025-11-06	@ PHX	20	9.78	+104.5%	5	2/14	1/9	1/5	0/0	0	1	1	1	0	2	3	-23.0	18%
2025-11-03	vs MIA	20	12.48	+60.3%	12	5/8	3/4	2/4	0/2	1	0	1	2	1	3	3	-2.0	68%
2025-10-31	vs NOP	21	10.43	+101.4%	9	3/8	2/6	1/2	2/2	0	1	1	2	0	1	2	+5.0	51%
2025-10-24	vs PHX	20	20	0%	6	2/4	2/4	0/0	2/2	1	0	1	2	0	1	1	+2.0	62%
2025-10-22	@ UTA	20	—	—	5	2/5	1/1	1/4	0/0	0	1	1	0	1	1	4	-9.0	50%

All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.

HISTORY

Season and milestone evidence

DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26

How often did the threshold occur?

historical frequency

These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.

20+ POINTS0.0%0/6 games

10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/6 games

5+ ASSISTS0.0%0/6 games

2+ THREES33.3%2/6 games

SEASON HISTORY

Regular-season production

accepted player-safe games

Season	Team(s)	G	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	FG%	3P%	FT%
2025–26	LAC	6	20.2	8.2	0.8	1.7	37.5%	36.8%	75.0%
2024–25	PHX	53	32.0	17.0	3.3	3.7	49.7%	38.6%	80.3%
2023–24	PHX	53	33.4	18.2	4.4	5.0	51.3%	43.0%	81.3%
2022–23	WAS	50	33.5	23.2	3.9	5.4	50.6%	36.4%	84.2%
2021–22	WAS	39	35.9	23.4	4.7	6.6	45.7%	30.2%	82.7%
2020–21	WAS	60	35.8	31.3	4.7	4.4	48.5%	34.8%	88.9%
2019–20	WAS	57	36.0	30.5	4.3	6.1	45.5%	35.3%	84.3%

AF-PLAYER HISTORY

Season by season

Season	Team	G	AF-Player	Rank	PH$	Band
2024–25	PHX	53	47.9	#153 / 422	15.2M	Core
2023–24	PHX	57	49.4	#122 / 409	17.2M	Core
2022–23	WAS	50	53.8	#62 / 408	20M	Core
2021–22	WAS	40	51.1	#96 / 423	17.8M	Core
2020–21	WAS	68	54.5	#62 / 410	24.1M	Core
2019–20	WAS	57	56.0	#48 / 385	23.6M	Core

PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.

CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY

Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.

governed identity

Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.

Open team profile

IMPACT

Rating and role context

AF-PLAYER

Measured production, 2024–25

#153 OF 422

AF-PLAYER47.9descriptive index, not a win probability

NBA RANK#153of 422 ranked

PH$15.2MCore

SAMPLE53observed games

Ball security

Box defence

Creation

Efficiency

Rebounding

Scoring

PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.

E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE

Distinct signals, side by side

descriptive · current role + historical rating

Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.

VALUE OVER ROLE—requires eligible AF-Player + governed role

AF MOVEMENT—two eligible completed seasons required

ROLE CHANGEUNAVAILABLEcomparison unavailable

STAR DEPENDENCY—governed What If sample unavailable

Player movement Opportunities Compare players

Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.

PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26

Pregame role and with/without context

descriptive · not causal

Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.

LAC

LA Clippers

EXPECTED MIN9.4

SCORING SHARE6.4%

CREATION SHARE5.1%

PARTICIPATION PRIOR48.7%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.