Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Amir Coffey
Phoenix Suns current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYER37.72025–26
NBA RANK#294of 409
PH$6.7MDepth · fictional game currencySTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MIN1.0governed role
NEXT GAME@ Portland Trail Blazers2026-10-21WHAT IF IMPACT-1.0 ppteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN10.5
PTS3.1
REB1.3
AST0.6
STL0.2
BLK0.1
3PM0.3
FG%48.0%
3P%32.6%
FT%78.6%
+/--1.3
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · Phoenix Suns
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED4.07pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G1.4 PTS · 0.4 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G4 PTS · 1.8 REB · 0.6 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G0.7 PTS · 0.2 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G2.2 PTS · 1.1 REB · 0.3 AST
creation↑
efficiency↑
minutes→
rebounding↑
scoring↑
HOT historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS45.6%788/1728
2-POINT52.8%467/885
3-POINT38.1%321/843
FREE THROW83.4%381/457
EFFECTIVE FG%54.9%
TRUE SHOOTING%59.0%
AST / TO2.24
PTS PER 3612.82rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 184 | 17.09 | 6.26 | 1.88 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.34 | 0.15 |
| Away | 181 | 17.95 | 6.22 | 1.8 | 1.14 | 0.81 | 0.48 | 0.12 |
| Home − Away | — | -0.9 | +0.0 | +0.1 | -0.1 | +0.1 | -0.1 | +0.0 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1.07 | high |
| minutes | 4.4 | 19 | 27 | 17.52 | high |
| points | 0 | 5 | 11 | 6.24 | high |
| rebounds | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1.84 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES20.5% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-10 | @ LAL | 21 | 0.34 | +6090.1% | 7 | 3/6 | 2/4 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -11.0 | 58% |
| 2026-03-19 | @ SAS | 6 | 4.39 | +36.8% | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +3.0 | — |
| 2026-03-16 | @ BOS | 4 | 7.24 | -44.8% | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +1.0 | — |
| 2026-03-08 | vs CHA | 5 | 14.81 | -66.2% | 2 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -4.0 | 100% |
| 2026-03-06 | vs NOP | 7 | 17 | -58.8% | 0 | 0/2 | 0/0 | 0/2 | 0/0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +4.0 | 0% |
| 2026-03-05 | vs CHI | 17 | 14.41 | +17.9% | 12 | 3/4 | 1/2 | 2/2 | 4/7 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | +3.0 | 85% |
| 2026-03-03 | @ SAC | 12 | 14.44 | -16.9% | 2 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3.0 | 33% |
| 2026-02-26 | vs LAL | 17 | 14.45 | +17.7% | 6 | 2/2 | 0/0 | 2/2 | 0/0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +20.0 | 150% |
| 2026-02-24 | vs BOS | 23 | 12.7 | +81.1% | 6 | 3/6 | 3/6 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | +5.0 | 50% |
| 2026-02-22 | vs POR | 23 | 10.45 | +120.1% | 8 | 3/7 | 3/5 | 0/2 | 2/2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -13.0 | 51% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS0.0%0/42 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/42 games
5+ ASSISTS0.0%0/42 games
2+ THREES7.1%3/42 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
| Season | Team(s) | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | PHXMIL | 42 | 10.5 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 48.0% | 32.6% | 78.6% |
| 2024–25 | LAC | 72 | 24.3 | 9.7 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 47.1% | 40.9% | 89.1% |
| 2023–24 | LAC | 70 | 20.8 | 6.6 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 47.2% | 38.0% | 85.9% |
| 2022–23 | LAC | 50 | 12.5 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 38.6% | 27.5% | 77.8% |
| 2021–22 | LAC | 69 | 22.7 | 9.0 | 2.9 | 1.8 | 45.3% | 37.8% | 86.3% |
| 2020–21 | LAC | 44 | 9.0 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 43.7% | 41.1% | 71.0% |
| 2019–20 | LAC | 18 | 8.8 | 3.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 42.6% | 31.6% | 54.5% |
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | PHX | 47 | 37.7 | #294 / 409 | 6.7M | Depth |
| 2024–25 | LAC | 72 | 39.6 | #279 / 422 | 10M | Rotation |
| 2023–24 | LAC | 76 | 34.6 | #341 / 409 | 7.4M | Depth |
| 2022–23 | LAC | 51 | 26.2 | #397 / 408 | 5.4M | Depth |
| 2021–22 | LAC | 77 | 43.8 | #195 / 423 | 13.1M | Rotation |
| 2020–21 | LAC | 70 | 38.5 | #291 / 410 | 6.7M | Depth |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2025–26
AF-PLAYER37.7descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#294of 409 ranked
PH$6.7MDepth
SAMPLE47observed games
Ball security86
Box defence16
Creation34
Efficiency54
Rebounding22
Scoring14
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE+26.7 ppAF-Player pct − Expected Minutes pct
AF MOVEMENT-5.8 pp2024–25 → 2025–26
ROLE CHANGECONTRACTING-8.5 min vs latest observed MPG
STAR DEPENDENCY49-1.0 pp next-game What If impact
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
PHX
Phoenix Suns
EXPECTED MIN7.6
SCORING SHARE4.6%
CREATION SHARE5.2%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR56.9%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.
MIL
Milwaukee Bucks
EXPECTED MIN5.0
SCORING SHARE2.0%
CREATION SHARE1.2%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR55.2%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.