PROBHOOPS · NBA ANALYTICS · TEAMS · PLAYERS · PROBABILITIES
FIND ANYTHING

Teams & players

Start typing to search the ProbHoops directory.

Tip: press / anywhere to search.

PLAYER PROFILE · HISTORICAL

Allen Crabbe

Accepted historical regular-season production. No current 2026–27 roster status is inferred.

Minnesota Timberwolves · last observed team
AF-PLAYER23.72019–20
NBA RANK#377of 385
PH$5.4MDepth · fictional game currency
STATUSHistoricalno current binding
EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported
NEXT GAMENo assigned gameSchedule pendingWHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual
REGULAR-SEASON GAMES37

Player-safe accepted corpus.

CAREER PPG · CORPUS4.7

2019–20 through 2025–26 window.

CAREER RPG · CORPUS2.1

Historical window, not full NBA career.

CAREER APG · CORPUS0.9

Historical window, not full NBA career.

LATEST COMPLETED SEASON

2019–20

37 games
MIN17.6
PTS4.7
REB2.1
AST0.9
STL0.4
BLK0.1
3PM1.0
FG%35.6%
3P%30.3%
FT%71.4%
+/--6.0

NEXT GAME

Current context

No current roster binding is published for this historical profile. ProbHoops does not infer a current team, availability or expected minutes from historical data.

MINUTES + FORM

Role-adjusted performance

Current form is unavailable because this historical profile is not bound to the governed 2026–27 roster. No current role is inferred.

LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2019–20

Historical Minutes Intelligence

DESCRIPTIVE · NOT CURRENT

Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.

LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED0.61pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown

LAST 5

ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G0.8 PTS · 2.2 REB · 0.8 AST

LAST 10

ALL OBSERVED10 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT7 G1 PTS · 2.29 REB · 1.29 AST

MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.

SPLITS + EFFICIENCY

How the production is built

EFFICIENCY

Shooting, derived from the box score

CAREER · 37 GAMES

2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.

FIELD GOALS35.6%63/177
2-POINT46.6%27/58
3-POINT30.3%36/119
FREE THROW71.4%10/14
EFFECTIVE FG%45.8%
TRUE SHOOTING%46.9%
AST / TO1.94
PTS PER 369.48rate, not projection

HOME / AWAY

Where the games were played

18 HOME · 19 AWAY
SplitGMINPTSREBAST3PMSTLBLK
Home1817.475.112.170.780.940.390.06
Away1917.824.212110.420.16
Home − Away—-0.3+0.9+0.2-0.2-0.1-0.0-0.1

Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.

CONSISTENCY

What the average hides

37 GAMES

Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.

CategoryFloorMedianCeilingMeanVolatility
assists0110.89high
minutes1217.622.817.65medium
points0384.65high
rebounds1232.08high

Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.

DOUBLE-DOUBLES

Observed frequency across the corpus

37 GAMES
DOUBLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%

Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.

GAME LOG · 2019–20

One log, the window you choose

10 games
DateOppMINEXP MINMIN ΔPTSFG2P3PFTORDRREBASTSTLBLKTOVPF+/-TS%
2020-02-21vs BOS10.99.3+17%00/20/00/20/000000011-4.00%
2020-02-12vs CHA11.27.72+44.6%00/20/00/20/011200001-8.00%
2020-02-10@ TOR16.56.15+167.8%83/81/22/60/003300001-6.050%
2020-02-08vs LAC175.69+199.3%31/20/01/20/000020000-2.075%
2020-02-05vs ATL12.65.9+113.7%21/21/10/10/001100011-11.050%
2020-01-25vs OKC417.72-77.1%00/10/00/10/001100010-5.00%
2020-01-24vs HOU21.916.21+35.3%83/62/21/41/202200014+6.058%
2020-01-22@ CHI20.313.99+45.4%52/71/21/50/002200012-15.036%
2020-01-20vs DEN16.7——31/40/11/30/001130001-11.038%
2020-01-14vs PHX16.8——21/31/20/10/013410101+4.033%

All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.

HISTORY

Season and milestone evidence

DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2019–20

How often did the threshold occur?

historical frequency

These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.

20+ POINTS2.7%1/37 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/37 games
5+ ASSISTS0.0%0/37 games
2+ THREES24.3%9/37 games

SEASON HISTORY

Regular-season production

accepted player-safe games
SeasonTeam(s)GMINPTSREBASTFG%3P%FT%
2019–20MINATL3717.64.72.10.935.6%30.3%71.4%

CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY

No current roster binding for this historical profile

governed identity

This historical profile is not currently bound to the NBA Official 2026–27 roster product. ProbHoops does not infer a current team from historical data.

Open team profile

IMPACT

Rating and role context

AF-PLAYER

Measured production, 2019–20

#377 OF 385
AF-PLAYER23.7descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#377of 385 ranked
PH$5.4MDepth
SAMPLE39observed games
Ball security
79
Box defence
22
Creation
30
Efficiency
13
Rebounding
19
Scoring
17

PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.

PLAYER IMPACT · 2019–20

Pregame role and with/without context

descriptive · not causal

Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.

MIN

Minnesota Timberwolves

EXPECTED MIN7.7
SCORING SHARE3.1%
CREATION SHARE2.9%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR55.7%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.

ATL

Atlanta Hawks

EXPECTED MIN13.4
SCORING SHARE5.2%
CREATION SHARE3.9%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR69.8%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.