PROBHOOPS · NBA ANALYTICS · TEAMS · PLAYERS · PROBABILITIES
FIND ANYTHING

Teams & players

Start typing to search the ProbHoops directory.

Tip: press / anywhere to search.

PLAYER PROFILE · HISTORICAL

Y. Hansen

Accepted historical regular-season production. No current 2026–27 roster status is inferred.

Portland Trail Blazers · last observed team
AF-PLAYERPendingsample gate
NBA RANK—not ranked
PH$—pending · how PH$ works
STATUSHistoricalno current binding
EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported
NEXT GAMENo assigned gameSchedule pendingWHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual
REGULAR-SEASON GAMES39

Player-safe accepted corpus.

CAREER PPG · CORPUS2.2

2019–20 through 2025–26 window.

CAREER RPG · CORPUS1.5

Historical window, not full NBA career.

CAREER APG · CORPUS0.6

Historical window, not full NBA career.

LATEST COMPLETED SEASON

2025–26

39 games
MIN7.2
PTS2.2
REB1.5
AST0.6
STL0.1
BLK0.2
3PM0.1
FG%31.2%
3P%12.8%
FT%80.0%
+/--2.2

NEXT GAME

Current context

No current roster binding is published for this historical profile. ProbHoops does not infer a current team, availability or expected minutes from historical data.

MINUTES + FORM

Role-adjusted performance

Current form is unavailable because this historical profile is not bound to the governed 2026–27 roster. No current role is inferred.

LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26

Historical Minutes Intelligence

DESCRIPTIVE · NOT CURRENT

Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.

LATEST ACTUAL2minutes
EXPECTED0.85pregame reference
DEVIATION+133.9%expanded minutes

LAST 5

ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0.2 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G1.6 PTS · 1.2 REB · 0.2 AST

LAST 10

ALL OBSERVED10 G0.4 PTS · 0.4 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G1.6 PTS · 1.2 REB · 0.2 AST

STEADY historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.

SPLITS + EFFICIENCY

How the production is built

EFFICIENCY

Shooting, derived from the box score

CAREER · 39 GAMES

2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.

FIELD GOALS31.2%29/93
2-POINT44.4%24/54
3-POINT12.8%5/39
FREE THROW80.0%24/30
EFFECTIVE FG%33.9%
TRUE SHOOTING%41.0%
AST / TO0.81
PTS PER 3611.11rate, not projection

HOME / AWAY

Where the games were played

21 HOME · 18 AWAY
SplitGMINPTSREBAST3PMSTLBLK
Home216.762.191.480.520.10.050.24
Away187.782.281.610.610.170.110.22
Home − Away—-1.0-0.1-0.1-0.1-0.1-0.1+0.0

Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.

CONSISTENCY

What the average hides

39 GAMES

Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.

CategoryFloorMedianCeilingMeanVolatility
assists0010.56high
minutes36117.23high
points0242.23high
rebounds0131.54high

Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.

DOUBLE-DOUBLES

Observed frequency across the corpus

39 GAMES
DOUBLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%

Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.

GAME LOG · 2025–26

One log, the window you choose

10 games
DateOppMINEXP MINMIN ΔPTSFG2P3PFTORDRREBASTSTLBLKTOVPF+/-TS%
2026-04-12vs SAC20.85+133.9%00/00/00/00/001100000-4.0—
2026-04-10vs LAC20.5+302.3%00/00/00/00/000000000+1.0—
2026-03-23vs BKN90.83+978.5%42/22/20/00/103300000+2.082%
2026-03-08vs IND42.17+84.6%51/21/20/03/310100000-1.075%
2026-03-01@ ATL62.27+164.1%00/10/00/10/001110000-11.00%
2026-02-28@ CHA22.4-16.7%21/21/10/10/0101000000.050%
2026-02-20vs DEN83.36+138.2%41/41/30/12/610100110-12.030%
2026-02-12@ UTA33.59-16.4%20/10/10/02/200000001-8.053%
2026-02-11@ MIN54.23+18.1%21/11/10/00/010101001-3.0100%
2026-02-09vs PHI53.63+37.6%21/41/10/30/001100012-8.025%

All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.

HISTORY

Season and milestone evidence

DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26

How often did the threshold occur?

historical frequency

These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.

20+ POINTS0.0%0/39 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/39 games
5+ ASSISTS0.0%0/39 games
2+ THREES0.0%0/39 games

SEASON HISTORY

Regular-season production

accepted player-safe games
SeasonTeam(s)GMINPTSREBASTFG%3P%FT%
2025–26POR397.22.21.50.631.2%12.8%80.0%

CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY

No current roster binding for this historical profile

governed identity

This historical profile is not currently bound to the NBA Official 2026–27 roster product. ProbHoops does not infer a current team from historical data.

Open team profile

IMPACT

Rating and role context

AF-PLAYER

Measured production, 2025–26

PENDING SAMPLE

ProbHoops has observed 43 games of this player in 2025–26 — below the sample floor required to rank. He carries no AF-Player and no PH$. Pending means not enough observation, never a low score.

PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26

Pregame role and with/without context

descriptive · not causal

Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.

POR

Portland Trail Blazers

EXPECTED MIN3.8
SCORING SHARE2.0%
CREATION SHARE2.2%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR52.6%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.