PLAYER PROFILE · HISTORICAL

Robert Woodard II

Accepted historical regular-season production. No current 2026–27 roster status is inferred.

Sacramento Kings · last observed teamUSAMississippi State

AF-PLAYERPendingsample gate

NBA RANK—not ranked

PH$—pending · how PH$ works

STATUSHistoricalno current binding

EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported

NEXT GAMENo assigned gameSchedule pending WHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual

REGULAR-SEASON GAMES25

Player-safe accepted corpus.

CAREER PPG · CORPUS1.1

2019–20 through 2025–26 window.

CAREER RPG · CORPUS1.1

Historical window, not full NBA career.

CAREER APG · CORPUS0.2

Historical window, not full NBA career.

LATEST COMPLETED SEASON

2021–22

12 games

MIN3.5

PTS0.6

REB0.9

AST0.3

STL0.1

BLK0.1

3PM0.1

FG%12.5%

3P%25.0%

FT%100.0%

+/-+1.3

NEXT GAME

Current context

No current roster binding is published for this historical profile. ProbHoops does not infer a current team, availability or expected minutes from historical data.

MINUTES + FORM

Role-adjusted performance

Current form is unavailable because this historical profile is not bound to the governed 2026–27 roster. No current role is inferred.

LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2021–22

Historical Minutes Intelligence

DESCRIPTIVE · NOT CURRENT

Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.

LATEST ACTUAL0minutes

EXPECTED—pregame reference

DEVIATION—expected minutes unavailable

LAST 5

ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST

ROLE-CONSISTENT0 G— PTS · — REB · — AST

LAST 10

ALL OBSERVED10 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST

ROLE-CONSISTENT0 G— PTS · — REB · — AST

creation—

efficiency—

minutes—

rebounding—

scoring—

Form label withheld: insufficient role-consistent sample. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.

SPLITS + EFFICIENCY

How the production is built

EFFICIENCY

Shooting, derived from the box score

CAREER · 25 GAMES

2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.

FIELD GOALS27.8%10/36

2-POINT30.8%8/26

3-POINT—2/10

FREE THROW50.0%5/10

EFFECTIVE FG%30.6%

TRUE SHOOTING%33.4%

AST / TO2.5

HOME / AWAY

Where the games were played

13 HOME · 12 AWAY

Split	G	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	3PM	STL	BLK
Home	13	3.55	1.54	0.46	0.08	0.15	0	0.15
Away	12	3.45	0.58	1.75	0.33	0	0.08	0.17
Home − Away	—	+0.1	+1.0	-1.3	-0.3	+0.1	-0.1	-0.0

Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.

CONSISTENCY

What the average hides

25 GAMES

Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.

Category	Floor	Median	Ceiling	Mean	Volatility
assists	0	0	0	0.2	high
minutes	1.4	2.9	4	3.5	high
points	0	0	2	1.08	high
rebounds	0	1	2	1.08	high

Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.

DOUBLE-DOUBLES

Observed frequency across the corpus

25 GAMES

DOUBLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games

TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games

10+ ASSISTS00.0%

10+ BLOCKS00.0%

Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.

GAME LOG · 2021–22

One log, the window you choose

10 games

Date	Opp	MIN	EXP MIN	MIN Δ	PTS	FG	2P	3P	FT	OR	DR	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PF	+/-	TS%
2022-02-08	vs MIN	7.4	1.35	+448.7%	2	1/4	1/3	0/1	0/0	1	0	1	0	0	0	1	-3.0	25%
2022-01-31	@ NYK	3.6	2.78	+31.3%	0	0/3	0/2	0/1	0/0	1	1	2	2	1	0	0	+6.0	0%
2022-01-26	@ ATL	3.8	2.16	+74.7%	0	0/1	0/1	0/0	0/0	1	1	2	0	0	0	0	+6.0	0%
2022-01-25	@ BOS	12	—	—	0	0/4	0/3	0/1	0/0	2	2	4	1	0	1	0	-11.0	0%
2022-01-09	@ POR	1.2	0.7	+66.9%	0	0/1	0/1	0/0	0/0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	+2.0	0%
2022-01-07	@ DEN	0.8	0.59	+27.1%	0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	0.0	—
2021-12-31	vs DAL	1.9	1.12	+70.7%	0	0/1	0/1	0/0	0/0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	+9.0	0%
2021-12-26	vs MEM	3	—	—	3	1/1	0/0	1/1	0/0	0	0	0	0	0	0	2	+2.0	150%
2021-12-22	vs LAC	1.5	—	—	0	0/1	0/1	0/0	0/0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	-1.0	0%
2021-12-20	@ GSW	1.8	—	—	0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0/0	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	-1.0	—

All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.

HISTORY

Season and milestone evidence

DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2021–22

How often did the threshold occur?

historical frequency

These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.

20+ POINTS0.0%0/12 games

10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/12 games

5+ ASSISTS0.0%0/12 games

2+ THREES0.0%0/12 games

SEASON HISTORY

Regular-season production

accepted player-safe games

Season	Team(s)	G	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	FG%	3P%	FT%
2021–22	SAC	12	3.5	0.6	0.9	0.3	12.5%	25.0%	100.0%
2020–21	SAC	13	3.5	1.5	1.2	0.1	40.0%	16.7%	37.5%

CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY

No current roster binding for this historical profile

governed identity

This historical profile is not currently bound to the NBA Official 2026–27 roster product. ProbHoops does not infer a current team from historical data.

Open team profile

IMPACT

Rating and role context

AF-PLAYER

Measured production, 2021–22

PENDING SAMPLE

ProbHoops has observed 29 games of this player in 2021–22 — below the sample floor required to rank. He carries no AF-Player and no PH$. Pending means not enough observation, never a low score.

PLAYER IMPACT · 2021–22

Pregame role and with/without context

descriptive · not causal

Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.

SAC

Sacramento Kings

EXPECTED MIN1.1

SCORING SHARE0.5%

CREATION SHARE0.6%

PARTICIPATION PRIOR33.4%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.