Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Kyshawn George
Washington Wizards current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYER44.82025–26
NBA RANK#184of 409
PH$12.7MRotation · fictional game currencySTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MIN14.3governed role
NEXT GAMEvs Milwaukee Bucks2026-10-21WHAT IF IMPACT-0.4 ppteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN29.3
PTS15.0
REB5.3
AST4.6
STL1.0
BLK0.9
3PM2.1
FG%44.1%
3P%38.6%
FT%80.5%
+/--7.9
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · Washington Wizards
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED0.52pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G12.6 PTS · 2.4 REB · 2.8 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G13.6 PTS · 3.7 REB · 4.2 AST
creation↓
efficiency→
minutes↓
rebounding↓
scoring↑
COLD historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS40.5%430/1061
2-POINT47.7%227/476
3-POINT34.7%203/585
FREE THROW78.1%164/210
EFFECTIVE FG%50.1%
TRUE SHOOTING%53.2%
AST / TO1.72
PTS PER 3614.49rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 52 | 27.38 | 11.23 | 4.4 | 3.12 | 1.79 | 1.06 | 0.81 |
| Away | 58 | 28 | 11.09 | 4.88 | 3.57 | 1.9 | 1.03 | 0.74 |
| Home − Away | — | -0.6 | +0.1 | -0.5 | -0.5 | -0.1 | +0.0 | +0.1 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 1 | 3 | 5 | 3.35 | high |
| minutes | 23 | 28 | 34 | 27.71 | low |
| points | 5 | 10.5 | 17 | 11.15 | high |
| rebounds | 2 | 4 | 7 | 4.65 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES43.6% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-28 | vs TOR | 15 | 14.83 | +1.2% | 14 | 5/7 | 2/4 | 3/3 | 1/2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | +2.0 | 89% |
| 2026-02-24 | @ ATL | 21 | 16.22 | +29.4% | 11 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 1/5 | 4/4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | -24.0 | 47% |
| 2026-02-22 | vs CHA | 18 | 18.07 | -0.4% | 13 | 4/9 | 2/5 | 2/4 | 3/3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -21.0 | 63% |
| 2026-02-11 | @ CLE | 24 | 18.15 | +32.2% | 17 | 4/12 | 3/8 | 1/4 | 8/8 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | -18.0 | 55% |
| 2026-02-08 | vs MIA | 19 | 18.88 | +0.7% | 13 | 4/12 | 1/6 | 3/6 | 2/2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | -4.0 | 51% |
| 2026-02-05 | @ DET | 18 | 28.49 | -36.8% | 8 | 3/5 | 2/2 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -1.0 | 68% |
| 2026-02-03 | vs NYK | 26 | 28.47 | -8.7% | 8 | 3/8 | 3/7 | 0/1 | 2/2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -33.0 | 45% |
| 2026-02-01 | vs SAC | 19 | 31.08 | -38.9% | 6 | 3/6 | 3/5 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | -2.0 | 50% |
| 2026-01-30 | vs LAL | 27 | 31.79 | -15.1% | 15 | 5/12 | 3/5 | 2/7 | 3/4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | -17.0 | 55% |
| 2026-01-29 | vs MIL | 36 | — | — | 23 | 10/24 | 8/16 | 2/8 | 1/1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +2.0 | 47% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS24.4%11/45 games
10+ REBOUNDS6.7%3/45 games
5+ ASSISTS48.9%22/45 games
2+ THREES64.4%29/45 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | WAS | 45 | 44.8 | #184 / 409 | 12.7M | Rotation |
| 2024–25 | WAS | 65 | 26.6 | #412 / 422 | 6.4M | Depth |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2025–26
AF-PLAYER44.8descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#184of 409 ranked
PH$12.7MRotation
SAMPLE45observed games
Ball security23
Box defence47
Creation54
Efficiency43
Rebounding32
Scoring57
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE+27.7 ppAF-Player pct − Expected Minutes pct
AF MOVEMENT+52.8 pp2024–25 → 2025–26
ROLE CHANGECONTRACTING-15.0 min vs latest observed MPG
STAR DEPENDENCY33-0.4 pp next-game What If impact
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
WAS
Washington Wizards
EXPECTED MIN21.3
SCORING SHARE13.6%
CREATION SHARE18.6%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR68.8%
-1.56 residual margin pts in the qualified normal-load vs nonparticipation diagnostic · 23 normal-load / 5 nonparticipation games.