Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Jordan Miller
LA Clippers current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYER50.92025–26
NBA RANK#97of 409
PH$16.7MCore · fictional game currencySTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MIN12.7governed role
NEXT GAMEvs Sacramento Kings2026-10-21WHAT IF IMPACT-1.0 ppteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN21.8
PTS9.9
REB3.1
AST2.2
STL0.8
BLK0.2
3PM0.7
FG%53.2%
3P%35.6%
FT%77.4%
+/--0.5
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · LA Clippers
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL29minutes
EXPECTED25.7pregame reference
DEVIATION+12.8%role consistent
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G11.6 PTS · 2.8 REB · 3.6 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G12.8 PTS · 4.4 REB · 4 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G9.6 PTS · 2.2 REB · 2.5 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G11.1 PTS · 3.6 REB · 3.3 AST
creation↑
efficiency↑
minutes→
rebounding↑
scoring↑
HOT historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS50.7%255/503
2-POINT58.1%209/360
3-POINT32.2%46/143
FREE THROW77.9%148/190
EFFECTIVE FG%55.3%
TRUE SHOOTING%60.0%
AST / TO1.85
PTS PER 3615.46rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 53 | 15.72 | 6.92 | 2.02 | 1.43 | 0.42 | 0.55 | 0.15 |
| Away | 46 | 17.52 | 7.33 | 2.72 | 1.72 | 0.52 | 0.63 | 0.17 |
| Home − Away | — | -1.8 | -0.4 | -0.7 | -0.3 | -0.1 | -0.1 | -0.0 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1.57 | high |
| minutes | 4.6 | 17 | 25 | 16.56 | high |
| points | 1.6 | 6 | 12.4 | 7.11 | high |
| rebounds | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2.34 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES11.0% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-12 | vs GSW | 29 | 25.7 | +12.8% | 14 | 4/6 | 3/4 | 1/2 | 5/5 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +12.0 | 85% |
| 2026-04-10 | @ POR | 32 | 24.37 | +31.3% | 15 | 5/9 | 3/5 | 2/4 | 3/3 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -22.0 | 73% |
| 2026-04-08 | vs OKC | 30 | 22.03 | +36.2% | 16 | 6/11 | 5/7 | 1/4 | 3/4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -6.0 | 63% |
| 2026-04-05 | @ SAC | 23 | 19.32 | +19% | 13 | 5/6 | 2/3 | 3/3 | 0/0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | +21.0 | 108% |
| 2026-04-02 | vs SAS | 26 | 18.21 | +42.8% | 12 | 6/11 | 6/9 | 0/2 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -20.0 | 55% |
| 2026-03-31 | vs POR | 25 | 19.67 | +27.1% | 16 | 6/8 | 4/5 | 2/3 | 2/4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +3.0 | 82% |
| 2026-03-29 | @ MIL | 24 | 20.01 | +19.9% | 5 | 2/7 | 2/4 | 0/3 | 1/2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +1.0 | 32% |
| 2026-03-27 | @ IND | 13 | 21.66 | -40% | 5 | 2/6 | 2/6 | 0/0 | 1/3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -2.0 | 34% |
| 2026-03-21 | @ DAL | 22 | 25.81 | -14.8% | 10 | 3/7 | 3/6 | 0/1 | 4/4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 57% |
| 2026-03-19 | @ NOP | 37 | 23.84 | +55.2% | 11 | 2/8 | 2/5 | 0/3 | 7/11 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -17.0 | 43% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS9.1%5/55 games
10+ REBOUNDS1.8%1/55 games
5+ ASSISTS14.5%8/55 games
2+ THREES16.4%9/55 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | LAC | 56 | 50.9 | #97 / 409 | 16.7M | Core |
| 2024–25 | LAC | 39 | 31.6 | #382 / 422 | 5.5M | Depth |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2025–26
AF-PLAYER50.9descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#97of 409 ranked
PH$16.7MCore
SAMPLE56observed games
Ball security69
Box defence31
Creation42
Efficiency74
Rebounding26
Scoring42
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE+53.3 ppAF-Player pct − Expected Minutes pct
AF MOVEMENT+67.0 pp2024–25 → 2025–26
ROLE CHANGECONTRACTING-9.0 min vs latest observed MPG
STAR DEPENDENCY72-1.0 pp next-game What If impact
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
LAC
LA Clippers
EXPECTED MIN16.9
SCORING SHARE8.4%
CREATION SHARE7.6%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR72.8%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.