Player-safe accepted corpus.
PLAYER PROFILE · HISTORICAL
Jarrell Brantley
Accepted historical regular-season production. No current 2026–27 roster status is inferred.
AF-PLAYERPendingsample gate
NBA RANK—not ranked
PH$—pending · how PH$ worksSTATUSHistoricalno current binding
EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported
NEXT GAMENo assigned gameSchedule pendingWHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2022–23
MIN10.0
PTS5.5
REB1.5
AST0.8
STL0.0
BLK0.5
3PM1.0
FG%57.1%
3P%44.4%
FT%100.0%
+/-+3.8
NEXT GAME
Current context
No current roster binding is published for this historical profile. ProbHoops does not infer a current team, availability or expected minutes from historical data.
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
Current form is unavailable because this historical profile is not bound to the governed 2026–27 roster. No current role is inferred.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2022–23
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED1.39pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT1 G2 PTS · 1 REB · 0 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G2.2 PTS · 0.6 REB · 0.3 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT1 G2 PTS · 1 REB · 0 AST
creation—
efficiency—
minutes—
rebounding—
scoring—
Form label withheld: insufficient role-consistent sample. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS45.7%43/94
2-POINT54.5%24/44
3-POINT38.0%19/50
FREE THROW—5/6
EFFECTIVE FG%55.9%
TRUE SHOOTING%56.9%
AST / TO1.71
PTS PER 3614.44rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 20 | 7.64 | 3.4 | 1.55 | 0.8 | 0.45 | 0.15 | 0.2 |
| Away | 21 | 5.79 | 2 | 1.05 | 0.62 | 0.48 | 0.33 | 0.24 |
| Home − Away | — | +1.9 | +1.4 | +0.5 | +0.2 | -0.0 | -0.2 | -0.0 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.71 | high |
| minutes | 1.9 | 3.9 | 10 | 6.69 | high |
| points | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2.68 | high |
| rebounds | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1.29 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2022–23
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-27 | vs PHX | 10 | 9.16 | +9.1% | 2 | 1/2 | 1/1 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +8.0 | 50% |
| 2023-03-25 | @ SAC | 16 | 6.29 | +154.5% | 13 | 5/8 | 2/3 | 3/5 | 0/0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | +2.0 | 81% |
| 2023-03-24 | vs MIL | 12 | 1.76 | +583.4% | 7 | 2/4 | 1/1 | 1/3 | 2/2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | +2.0 | 72% |
| 2023-03-22 | vs POR | 2 | — | — | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +3.0 | — |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2022–23
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS0.0%0/4 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/4 games
5+ ASSISTS0.0%0/4 games
2+ THREES25.0%1/4 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
No current roster binding for this historical profile
This historical profile is not currently bound to the NBA Official 2026–27 roster product. ProbHoops does not infer a current team from historical data.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2022–23
ProbHoops has observed 4 games of this player in 2022–23 — below the sample floor required to rank. He carries no AF-Player and no PH$. Pending means not enough observation, never a low score.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2022–23
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
UTA
Utah Jazz
EXPECTED MIN5.2
SCORING SHARE4.3%
CREATION SHARE2.5%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR60.9%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.