PROBHOOPS · NBA ANALYTICS · TEAMS · PLAYERS · PROBABILITIES
FIND ANYTHING

Teams & players

Start typing to search the ProbHoops directory.

Tip: press / anywhere to search.

PLAYER PROFILE · HISTORICAL

J. Beringer

Accepted historical regular-season production. No current 2026–27 roster status is inferred.

Minnesota Timberwolves · last observed team
AF-PLAYER60.32025–26
NBA RANK#20of 409
PH$16.9MCore · fictional game currency
STATUSHistoricalno current binding
EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported
NEXT GAMENo assigned gameSchedule pendingWHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual
REGULAR-SEASON GAMES37

Player-safe accepted corpus.

CAREER PPG · CORPUS4.0

2019–20 through 2025–26 window.

CAREER RPG · CORPUS2.2

Historical window, not full NBA career.

CAREER APG · CORPUS0.3

Historical window, not full NBA career.

LATEST COMPLETED SEASON

2025–26

37 games
MIN8.1
PTS4.0
REB2.2
AST0.3
STL0.2
BLK0.6
3PM0.0
FG%66.7%
3P%—
FT%70.3%
+/-+0.7

NEXT GAME

Current context

No current roster binding is published for this historical profile. ProbHoops does not infer a current team, availability or expected minutes from historical data.

MINUTES + FORM

Role-adjusted performance

Current form is unavailable because this historical profile is not bound to the governed 2026–27 roster. No current role is inferred.

LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26

Historical Minutes Intelligence

DESCRIPTIVE · NOT CURRENT

Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.

LATEST ACTUAL31minutes
EXPECTED8.71pregame reference
DEVIATION+256%expanded minutes

LAST 5

ALL OBSERVED5 G10.2 PTS · 4.8 REB · 0.6 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G2.8 PTS · 1.4 REB · 0.2 AST

LAST 10

ALL OBSERVED10 G5.5 PTS · 2.4 REB · 0.3 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT7 G2.86 PTS · 1.43 REB · 0.14 AST

MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.

SPLITS + EFFICIENCY

How the production is built

EFFICIENCY

Shooting, derived from the box score

CAREER · 37 GAMES

2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.

FIELD GOALS66.7%60/90
2-POINT66.7%60/90
3-POINT—0/0
FREE THROW70.3%26/37
EFFECTIVE FG%66.7%
TRUE SHOOTING%68.7%
AST / TO1.22
PTS PER 3617.64rate, not projection

HOME / AWAY

Where the games were played

19 HOME · 18 AWAY
SplitGMINPTSREBAST3PMSTLBLK
Home196.473.841.890.1100.110.74
Away189.724.062.50.500.280.5
Home − Away—-3.3-0.2-0.6-0.40.0-0.2+0.2

Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.

CONSISTENCY

What the average hides

37 GAMES

Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.

CategoryFloorMedianCeilingMeanVolatility
assists000.80.3high
minutes359.88.05high
points0263.95high
rebounds0142.19high

Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.

DOUBLE-DOUBLES

Observed frequency across the corpus

37 GAMES
DOUBLE-DOUBLES12.7% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%

Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.

GAME LOG · 2025–26

One log, the window you choose

10 games
DateOppMINEXP MINMIN ΔPTSFG2P3PFTORDRREBASTSTLBLKTOVPF+/-TS%
2026-04-12vs NOP318.71+256%249/129/120/06/9571210703-1.075%
2026-04-10@ HOU265.03+416.9%145/55/50/04/422412102-3.0104%
2026-04-08@ ORL231.24+1754.2%94/104/100/01/144810215-5.043%
2026-04-05vs CHA31.01+197.1%41/11/10/02/200000000+6.0106%
2026-03-28vs DET40.5+695.4%41/11/10/02/400001000-1.073%
2026-03-22@ BOS10.75+32.8%00/10/10/00/000000000-4.00%
2026-03-10@ LAL41.58+153.6%00/00/00/00/000010000+5.0—
2026-03-05vs TOR32.98+0.8%00/10/10/00/000001000-8.00%
2026-02-22vs PHI173.63+368.7%72/22/20/03/412300006-6.093%
2026-02-20vs DAL43.27+22.3%21/11/10/00/000000201-4.0100%

All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.

HISTORY

Season and milestone evidence

DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26

How often did the threshold occur?

historical frequency

These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.

20+ POINTS2.7%1/37 games
10+ REBOUNDS2.7%1/37 games
5+ ASSISTS0.0%0/37 games
2+ THREES0.0%0/37 games

SEASON HISTORY

Regular-season production

accepted player-safe games
SeasonTeam(s)GMINPTSREBASTFG%3P%FT%
2025–26MIN378.14.02.20.366.7%—70.3%

CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY

No current roster binding for this historical profile

governed identity

This historical profile is not currently bound to the NBA Official 2026–27 roster product. ProbHoops does not infer a current team from historical data.

Open team profile

IMPACT

Rating and role context

AF-PLAYER

Measured production, 2025–26

#20 OF 409
AF-PLAYER60.3descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#20of 409 ranked
PH$16.9MCore
SAMPLE42observed games
Ball security
57
Box defence
59
Creation
11
Efficiency
88
Rebounding
78
Scoring
48

PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.

PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26

Pregame role and with/without context

descriptive · not causal

Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.

MIN

Minnesota Timberwolves

EXPECTED MIN4.0
SCORING SHARE2.7%
CREATION SHARE0.9%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR51.6%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.