PROBHOOPS · NBA ANALYTICS · TEAMS · PLAYERS · PROBABILITIES
FIND ANYTHING

Teams & players

Start typing to search the ProbHoops directory.

Tip: press / anywhere to search.

PLAYER PROFILE · HISTORICAL

EJ Harkless

Accepted historical regular-season production. No current 2026–27 roster status is inferred.

Utah Jazz · last observed teamUNLV
AF-PLAYERPendingsample gate
NBA RANK—not ranked
PH$—pending · how PH$ works
STATUSHistoricalno current binding
EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported
NEXT GAMENo assigned gameSchedule pendingWHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual
REGULAR-SEASON GAMES25

Player-safe accepted corpus.

CAREER PPG · CORPUS4.4

2019–20 through 2025–26 window.

CAREER RPG · CORPUS1.8

Historical window, not full NBA career.

CAREER APG · CORPUS1.6

Historical window, not full NBA career.

LATEST COMPLETED SEASON

2025–26

15 games
MIN17.1
PTS5.3
REB1.5
AST2.2
STL1.1
BLK0.2
3PM0.6
FG%31.9%
3P%23.7%
FT%82.8%
+/-+2.3

NEXT GAME

Current context

No current roster binding is published for this historical profile. ProbHoops does not infer a current team, availability or expected minutes from historical data.

MINUTES + FORM

Role-adjusted performance

Current form is unavailable because this historical profile is not bound to the governed 2026–27 roster. No current role is inferred.

LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26

Historical Minutes Intelligence

DESCRIPTIVE · NOT CURRENT

Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.

LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED7.9pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown

LAST 5

ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT4 G4.25 PTS · 0.75 REB · 1 AST

LAST 10

ALL OBSERVED10 G1.1 PTS · 0.4 REB · 0.2 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT4 G4.25 PTS · 0.75 REB · 1 AST

Form label withheld: insufficient role-consistent sample. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.

SPLITS + EFFICIENCY

How the production is built

EFFICIENCY

Shooting, derived from the box score

CAREER · 25 GAMES

2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.

FIELD GOALS31.8%34/107
2-POINT40.9%18/44
3-POINT25.4%16/63
FREE THROW77.1%27/35
EFFECTIVE FG%39.3%
TRUE SHOOTING%45.3%
AST / TO3.15
PTS PER 3610.14rate, not projection

HOME / AWAY

Where the games were played

9 HOME · 16 AWAY
SplitGMINPTSREBAST3PMSTLBLK
Home918.226.331.782.670.671.440.11
Away1614.383.381.751.060.620.810.19
Home − Away—+3.8+3.0+0.0+1.6+0.1+0.6-0.1

Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.

CONSISTENCY

What the average hides

25 GAMES

Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.

CategoryFloorMedianCeilingMeanVolatility
assists012.21.64high
minutes8.6162215.76high
points0.838.64.44high
rebounds0231.76high

Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.

DOUBLE-DOUBLES

Observed frequency across the corpus

25 GAMES
DOUBLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%

Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.

GAME LOG · 2025–26

One log, the window you choose

10 games
DateOppMINEXP MINMIN ΔPTSFG2P3PFTORDRREBASTSTLBLKTOVPF+/-TS%
2026-03-27@ DEN4120.43+100.6%114/162/72/91/104422213-9.034%
2026-03-09vs GSW2418.48+29.9%164/103/61/47/802261022-1.059%
2026-03-07@ MIL1617.17-6.8%52/71/31/40/002220021+5.036%
2026-03-04@ PHI2015+33.4%31/50/21/30/012300002+5.030%
2026-03-02vs DEN2710.62+154.3%20/50/10/42/200032006-4.017%
2026-02-28vs NOP286.15+355.3%145/93/52/42/312351003+8.068%
2026-02-26vs NOP212.8+649.7%113/63/50/15/603364121+2.064%
2026-02-23@ HOU14——00/30/10/20/000042001+9.00%
2025-11-18@ LAL3——40/00/00/04/400011000+5.0114%
2025-11-11vs IND1——00/00/00/00/000000000+3.0—

All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.

HISTORY

Season and milestone evidence

DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26

How often did the threshold occur?

historical frequency

These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.

20+ POINTS0.0%0/15 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/15 games
5+ ASSISTS20.0%3/15 games
2+ THREES13.3%2/15 games

SEASON HISTORY

Regular-season production

accepted player-safe games
SeasonTeam(s)GMINPTSREBASTFG%3P%FT%
2025–26UTA1517.15.31.52.231.9%23.7%82.8%
2024–25UTA1013.73.22.10.831.4%28.0%50.0%

CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY

No current roster binding for this historical profile

governed identity

This historical profile is not currently bound to the NBA Official 2026–27 roster product. ProbHoops does not infer a current team from historical data.

Open team profile

IMPACT

Rating and role context

AF-PLAYER

Measured production, 2025–26

PENDING SAMPLE

ProbHoops has observed 15 games of this player in 2025–26 — below the sample floor required to rank. He carries no AF-Player and no PH$. Pending means not enough observation, never a low score.

PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26

Pregame role and with/without context

descriptive · not causal

Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.

UTA

Utah Jazz

EXPECTED MIN8.2
SCORING SHARE2.8%
CREATION SHARE4.7%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR53.6%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.