Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Cody Williams
Utah Jazz current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYER30.32025–26
NBA RANK#375of 409
PH$6.2MDepth · fictional game currencySTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MIN29.6governed role
NEXT GAME@ Memphis Grizzlies2026-10-21WHAT IF IMPACT-0.7 ppteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN20.9
PTS6.7
REB2.6
AST1.3
STL0.7
BLK0.4
3PM0.3
FG%47.0%
3P%20.7%
FT%68.8%
+/--5.7
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · Utah Jazz
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED33.78pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G7 PTS · 3 REB · 1.8 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G9.6 PTS · 2 REB · 2.8 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G5.9 PTS · 1.5 REB · 1.6 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G9.4 PTS · 2.5 REB · 1.9 AST
creation↑
efficiency→
minutes→
rebounding↓
scoring↑
MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS40.5%222/548
2-POINT51.1%169/331
3-POINT24.4%53/217
FREE THROW70.2%73/104
EFFECTIVE FG%45.4%
TRUE SHOOTING%48.0%
AST / TO1.59
PTS PER 369.79rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 53 | 20.85 | 5.08 | 2.09 | 1.32 | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.26 |
| Away | 47 | 21.09 | 6.4 | 2.83 | 1.19 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.49 |
| Home − Away | — | -0.2 | -1.3 | -0.7 | +0.1 | -0.1 | -0.0 | -0.2 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1.26 | high |
| minutes | 14.8 | 20 | 28 | 20.96 | medium |
| points | 2 | 5 | 9 | 5.7 | high |
| rebounds | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2.44 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES22.0% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-05 | @ OKC | 36 | 27.12 | +32.8% | 8 | 3/11 | 3/9 | 0/2 | 2/2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -27.0 | 34% |
| 2026-04-03 | @ HOU | 38 | 27.12 | +40.1% | 27 | 10/16 | 10/14 | 0/2 | 7/10 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | -29.0 | 66% |
| 2026-03-27 | @ DEN | 30 | 27.12 | +10.6% | 24 | 9/14 | 9/14 | 0/0 | 6/7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | -1.0 | 70% |
| 2026-03-09 | vs GSW | 43 | 23.41 | +83.7% | 12 | 5/12 | 5/8 | 0/4 | 2/2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | +1.0 | 47% |
| 2026-03-07 | @ MIL | 37 | 19.94 | +85.6% | 13 | 4/12 | 3/7 | 1/5 | 4/4 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -21.0 | 47% |
| 2026-03-04 | @ PHI | 28 | 20.33 | +37.8% | 9 | 3/6 | 2/2 | 1/4 | 2/2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +15.0 | 65% |
| 2026-03-02 | vs DEN | 11 | 22.39 | -50.9% | 3 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 1/2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -10.0 | 80% |
| 2026-02-28 | vs NOP | 21 | 21.43 | -2% | 4 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -18.0 | 40% |
| 2026-02-26 | vs NOP | 30 | 19.41 | +54.5% | 6 | 2/6 | 2/5 | 0/1 | 2/5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -9.0 | 37% |
| 2026-02-23 | @ HOU | 14 | 20.76 | -32.6% | 2 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -16.0 | 33% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS3.9%2/51 games
10+ REBOUNDS3.9%2/51 games
5+ ASSISTS5.9%3/51 games
2+ THREES5.9%3/51 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | UTA | 51 | 30.3 | #375 / 409 | 6.2M | Depth |
| 2024–25 | UTA | 49 | 17.6 | #422 / 422 | 5.6M | Depth |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2025–26
AF-PLAYER30.3descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#375of 409 ranked
PH$6.2MDepth
SAMPLE51observed games
Ball security69
Box defence33
Creation28
Efficiency29
Rebounding24
Scoring22
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE-57.9 ppAF-Player pct − Expected Minutes pct
AF MOVEMENT+8.3 pp2024–25 → 2025–26
ROLE CHANGEEXPANDING+8.7 min vs latest observed MPG
STAR DEPENDENCY15-0.7 pp next-game What If impact
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
UTA
Utah Jazz
EXPECTED MIN13.7
SCORING SHARE4.2%
CREATION SHARE2.6%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR68.5%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.