Player-safe accepted corpus.
CURRENT NBA ROSTER · PLAYER INTELLIGENCE
Coby White
Charlotte Hornets current context with accepted historical evidence kept separate.
AF-PLAYER50.72025–26
NBA RANK#99of 409
PH$16.8MCore · fictional game currencySTATUSUNSPECIFIEDsource status
EXPECTED MIN18.7governed role
NEXT GAME@ Brooklyn Nets2026-10-21WHAT IF IMPACT-1.4 ppteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2025–26
MIN25.4
PTS17.7
REB3.5
AST4.0
STL0.5
BLK0.1
3PM2.4
FG%44.9%
3P%36.5%
FT%81.9%
+/-+1.7
NEXT GAME
Current context
2026–27 · Charlotte Hornets
Assigned schedule
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
CURRENT FORM · 2026–27
Waiting for completed player boxscores
ProbHoops will activate Last 5 / Last 10 form only after observed 2026–27 player boxscores exist. No current form label is borrowed from 2025–26.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL16minutes
EXPECTED16.25pregame reference
DEVIATION-1.6%role consistent
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G9.4 PTS · 0.6 REB · 0.8 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G16.4 PTS · 1.8 REB · 2.4 AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G12.6 PTS · 2 REB · 1.7 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G16.5 PTS · 3.3 REB · 2.5 AST
creation↓
efficiency↑
minutes↓
rebounding↓
scoring↑
MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS43.5%2532/5827
2-POINT50.2%1440/2867
3-POINT36.9%1092/2960
FREE THROW85.6%1045/1221
EFFECTIVE FG%52.8%
TRUE SHOOTING%56.6%
AST / TO2.06
PTS PER 3618.94rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 238 | 29.1 | 15.35 | 3.74 | 3.81 | 2.36 | 0.68 | 0.17 |
| Away | 228 | 29.65 | 15.56 | 3.54 | 3.89 | 2.32 | 0.66 | 0.15 |
| Home − Away | — | -0.6 | -0.2 | +0.2 | -0.1 | +0.0 | +0.0 | +0.0 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 2 | 3.5 | 6 | 3.85 | high |
| minutes | 23 | 30 | 35.6 | 29.37 | low |
| points | 8 | 15 | 22 | 15.45 | high |
| rebounds | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3.64 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES153.2% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS81.7%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2025–26
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-12 | @ NYK | 16 | 16.25 | -1.6% | 19 | 6/10 | 3/4 | 3/6 | 4/6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +18.0 | 75% |
| 2026-04-10 | vs DET | 16 | 17.04 | -6.1% | 11 | 3/7 | 1/4 | 2/3 | 3/4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | -20.0 | 63% |
| 2026-04-05 | @ MIN | 20 | 20.63 | -3% | 17 | 5/11 | 2/6 | 3/5 | 4/5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | -5.0 | 64% |
| 2026-04-02 | vs PHX | 20 | 20.38 | -1.8% | 19 | 6/13 | 3/6 | 3/7 | 4/5 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | +5.0 | 63% |
| 2026-03-31 | @ BKN | 21 | 19.47 | +7.9% | 16 | 5/12 | 4/6 | 1/6 | 5/6 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | +11.0 | 55% |
| 2026-03-29 | vs BOS | 20 | 19.85 | +0.7% | 11 | 4/11 | 3/6 | 1/5 | 2/2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +13.0 | 46% |
| 2026-03-28 | vs PHI | 19 | 19.92 | -4.6% | 16 | 6/11 | 5/7 | 1/4 | 3/4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -14.0 | 63% |
| 2026-03-26 | vs NYK | 23 | 20.19 | +13.9% | 17 | 6/13 | 5/8 | 1/5 | 4/4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | +7.0 | 58% |
| 2026-03-24 | vs SAC | 18 | 20.55 | -12.4% | 27 | 9/12 | 3/4 | 6/8 | 3/3 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +26.0 | 101% |
| 2026-03-21 | vs MEM | 19 | 18.05 | +5.3% | 12 | 4/11 | 3/7 | 1/4 | 3/4 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | +13.0 | 47% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS45.8%22/48 games
10+ REBOUNDS2.1%1/48 games
5+ ASSISTS37.5%18/48 games
2+ THREES60.4%29/48 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
| Season | Team(s) | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | CHACHI | 48 | 25.4 | 17.7 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 44.9% | 36.5% | 81.9% |
| 2024–25 | CHI | 72 | 33.3 | 20.4 | 3.7 | 4.4 | 45.0% | 36.6% | 90.0% |
| 2023–24 | CHI | 79 | 36.5 | 19.1 | 4.5 | 5.1 | 44.8% | 37.6% | 83.9% |
| 2022–23 | CHI | 74 | 23.4 | 9.7 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 44.3% | 37.2% | 87.1% |
| 2021–22 | CHI | 61 | 27.5 | 12.7 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 43.3% | 38.5% | 85.7% |
| 2020–21 | CHI | 69 | 31.2 | 15.1 | 4.1 | 4.8 | 41.6% | 35.9% | 90.1% |
| 2019–20 | CHI | 63 | 25.9 | 13.4 | 3.6 | 2.7 | 39.7% | 36.0% | 79.4% |
AF-PLAYER HISTORY
Season by season
| Season | Team | G | AF-Player | Rank | PH$ | Band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–26 | CHA | 50 | 50.7 | #99 / 409 | 16.8M | Core |
| 2024–25 | CHI | 73 | 49.0 | #137 / 422 | 18.6M | Core |
| 2023–24 | CHI | 81 | 45.2 | #170 / 409 | 17.2M | Core |
| 2022–23 | CHI | 76 | 41.2 | #228 / 408 | 11.3M | Rotation |
| 2021–22 | CHI | 66 | 39.9 | #262 / 423 | 10.8M | Rotation |
| 2020–21 | CHI | 69 | 39.4 | #273 / 410 | 11.3M | Rotation |
| 2019–20 | CHI | 63 | 36.6 | #274 / 385 | 9.2M | Depth |
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency and carries no monetary value: it is not a salary, market value or contract figure, and it is not redeemable or convertible. How PH$ works.
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
Current context is active. Historical evidence stays historical.
Current roster, literal availability, expected minutes and future-game context come from the governed current product. Historical production and with/without evidence are not rewritten as current-season claims.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2025–26
AF-PLAYER50.7descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#99of 409 ranked
PH$16.8MCore
SAMPLE50observed games
Ball security42
Box defence16
Creation51
Efficiency57
Rebounding18
Scoring87
PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.
E67 · ROLE & ROSTER INTELLIGENCE
Distinct signals, side by side
Value Over Role, AF-Player Movement, Role Change and Star Dependency are separate diagnostics. They do not alter AF-Player, Form, Availability, Game Win or the governed What If scenario.
VALUE OVER ROLE+41.5 ppAF-Player pct − Expected Minutes pct
AF MOVEMENT+8.3 pp2024–25 → 2025–26
ROLE CHANGECONTRACTING-6.5 min vs latest observed MPG
STAR DEPENDENCY74-1.4 pp next-game What If impact
Boundary: Star Dependency is model dependency, not causal truth. Opportunity labels are mechanical screeners, not predictions or personnel recommendations. PH$ remains fictional game currency.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
CHA
Charlotte Hornets
EXPECTED MIN17.8
SCORING SHARE13.3%
CREATION SHARE12.0%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR79.3%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.
CHI
Chicago Bulls
EXPECTED MIN17.8
SCORING SHARE16.2%
CREATION SHARE16.2%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR61.1%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.