Player-safe accepted corpus.
PLAYER PROFILE · HISTORICAL
Cassius Winston
Accepted historical regular-season production. No current 2026–27 roster status is inferred.
AF-PLAYERPendingsample gate
NBA RANK—not ranked
PH$—pending · how PH$ worksSTATUSHistoricalno current binding
EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported
NEXT GAMENo assigned gameSchedule pendingWHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual2019–20 through 2025–26 window.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
Historical window, not full NBA career.
LATEST COMPLETED SEASON
2021–22
MIN5.6
PTS2.0
REB0.1
AST1.0
STL0.0
BLK0.0
3PM0.3
FG%36.4%
3P%33.3%
FT%100.0%
+/--0.9
NEXT GAME
Current context
No current roster binding is published for this historical profile. ProbHoops does not infer a current team, availability or expected minutes from historical data.
MINUTES + FORM
Role-adjusted performance
Current form is unavailable because this historical profile is not bound to the governed 2026–27 roster. No current role is inferred.
LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2021–22
Historical Minutes Intelligence
Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.
LATEST ACTUAL4.03minutes
EXPECTED1.58pregame reference
DEVIATION+154.5%expanded minutes
LAST 5
ALL OBSERVED5 G0.8 PTS · 0.2 REB · 0.4 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT0 G— PTS · — REB · — AST
LAST 10
ALL OBSERVED10 G0.4 PTS · 0.1 REB · 0.2 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT0 G— PTS · — REB · — AST
creation—
efficiency—
minutes—
rebounding—
scoring—
Form label withheld: insufficient role-consistent sample. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.
SPLITS + EFFICIENCY
How the production is built
EFFICIENCY
Shooting, derived from the box score
2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.
FIELD GOALS40.9%18/44
2-POINT38.1%8/21
3-POINT43.5%10/23
FREE THROW90.0%9/10
EFFECTIVE FG%52.3%
TRUE SHOOTING%56.8%
AST / TO2.38
PTS PER 3614.44rate, not projection
HOME / AWAY
Where the games were played
| Split | G | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | 3PM | STL | BLK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 17 | 3.41 | 1.35 | 0.12 | 0.53 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 0 |
| Away | 12 | 6.59 | 2.67 | 0.67 | 0.83 | 0.58 | 0 | 0.08 |
| Home − Away | — | -3.2 | -1.3 | -0.6 | -0.3 | -0.4 | +0.1 | -0.1 |
Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.
CONSISTENCY
What the average hides
Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.
| Category | Floor | Median | Ceiling | Mean | Volatility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| assists | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.66 | high |
| minutes | 1.2 | 2.9 | 6.7 | 4.73 | high |
| points | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1.9 | high |
| rebounds | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.34 | high |
Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.
DOUBLE-DOUBLES
Observed frequency across the corpus
DOUBLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%
Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.
GAME LOG · 2021–22
One log, the window you choose
| Date | Opp | MIN | EXP MIN | MIN Δ | PTS | FG | 2P | 3P | FT | OR | DR | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-10 | @ CHA | 4 | 1.58 | +154.5% | 0 | 0/3 | 0/2 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -2.0 | 0% |
| 2022-04-08 | vs NYK | 7.8 | — | — | 4 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 2/2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0 | 69% |
| 2022-02-25 | vs SAS | 4 | 2.82 | +42.9% | 0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | -5.0 | — |
| 2022-02-16 | @ IND | 5.9 | 2.06 | +188% | 3 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +7.0 | 150% |
| 2022-02-10 | vs BKN | 10.5 | — | — | 5 | 2/3 | 1/1 | 1/2 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | -3.0 | 83% |
| 2021-12-11 | vs UTA | 2.9 | 0.78 | +263.2% | 0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -5.0 | 0% |
| 2021-12-05 | @ TOR | 3.9 | — | — | 2 | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0/1 | 2/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +2.0 | 53% |
All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.
HISTORY
Season and milestone evidence
DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2021–22
How often did the threshold occur?
These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.
20+ POINTS0.0%0/7 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/7 games
5+ ASSISTS0.0%0/7 games
2+ THREES0.0%0/7 games
SEASON HISTORY
Regular-season production
CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY
No current roster binding for this historical profile
This historical profile is not currently bound to the NBA Official 2026–27 roster product. ProbHoops does not infer a current team from historical data.
Open team profileIMPACT
Rating and role context
AF-PLAYER
Measured production, 2021–22
ProbHoops has observed 18 games of this player in 2021–22 — below the sample floor required to rank. He carries no AF-Player and no PH$. Pending means not enough observation, never a low score.
PLAYER IMPACT · 2021–22
Pregame role and with/without context
Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.
WAS
Washington Wizards
EXPECTED MIN1.3
SCORING SHARE1.8%
CREATION SHARE4.5%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR26.3%
With/without sample did not qualify for publication.