PROBHOOPS · NBA ANALYTICS · TEAMS · PLAYERS · PROBABILITIES
FIND ANYTHING

Teams & players

Start typing to search the ProbHoops directory.

Tip: press / anywhere to search.

PLAYER PROFILE · HISTORICAL

C. Love

Accepted historical regular-season production. No current 2026–27 roster status is inferred.

Portland Trail Blazers · last observed team
AF-PLAYER34.12025–26
NBA RANK#336of 409
PH$6.7MDepth · fictional game currency
STATUSHistoricalno current binding
EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported
NEXT GAMENo assigned gameSchedule pendingWHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual
REGULAR-SEASON GAMES48

Player-safe accepted corpus.

CAREER PPG · CORPUS10.3

2019–20 through 2025–26 window.

CAREER RPG · CORPUS2.4

Historical window, not full NBA career.

CAREER APG · CORPUS2.4

Historical window, not full NBA career.

LATEST COMPLETED SEASON

2025–26

48 games
MIN20.6
PTS10.3
REB2.4
AST2.4
STL0.6
BLK0.1
3PM1.9
FG%38.8%
3P%32.0%
FT%73.5%
+/--2.6

NEXT GAME

Current context

No current roster binding is published for this historical profile. ProbHoops does not infer a current team, availability or expected minutes from historical data.

MINUTES + FORM

Role-adjusted performance

Current form is unavailable because this historical profile is not bound to the governed 2026–27 roster. No current role is inferred.

LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26

Historical Minutes Intelligence

DESCRIPTIVE · NOT CURRENT

Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.

LATEST ACTUAL2minutes
EXPECTED0.89pregame reference
DEVIATION+124.4%expanded minutes

LAST 5

ALL OBSERVED5 G0 PTS · 0 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G13.2 PTS · 2.4 REB · 3.4 AST

LAST 10

ALL OBSERVED10 G0.2 PTS · 0 REB · 0.1 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT10 G14.3 PTS · 2.5 REB · 4 AST

MIXED historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.

SPLITS + EFFICIENCY

How the production is built

EFFICIENCY

Shooting, derived from the box score

CAREER · 48 GAMES

2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.

FIELD GOALS38.8%183/472
2-POINT48.7%93/191
3-POINT32.0%90/281
FREE THROW73.5%36/49
EFFECTIVE FG%48.3%
TRUE SHOOTING%49.8%
AST / TO1.95
PTS PER 3617.93rate, not projection

HOME / AWAY

Where the games were played

24 HOME · 24 AWAY
SplitGMINPTSREBAST3PMSTLBLK
Home242211.462.422.52.210.670.12
Away2419.179.042.332.291.540.460.04
Home − Away—+2.8+2.4+0.1+0.2+0.7+0.2+0.1

Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.

CONSISTENCY

What the average hides

48 GAMES

Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.

CategoryFloorMedianCeilingMeanVolatility
assists1242.4high
minutes9.823.52920.58medium
points2.81017.610.25high
rebounds0242.38high

Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.

DOUBLE-DOUBLES

Observed frequency across the corpus

48 GAMES
DOUBLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%

Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.

GAME LOG · 2025–26

One log, the window you choose

10 games
DateOppMINEXP MINMIN ΔPTSFG2P3PFTORDRREBASTSTLBLKTOVPF+/-TS%
2026-04-12vs SAC20.89+124.4%00/10/00/10/000000000-4.00%
2026-04-08@ SAS21.57+27.5%00/00/00/00/000000010-4.0—
2026-03-31@ LAC11.64-39%21/11/10/00/0000000000.0100%
2026-03-25vs MIL8——00/30/20/10/000010001-1.00%
2026-02-12@ UTA1513.41+11.9%114/121/43/80/000020000-14.046%
2026-02-03vs PHX826.2-69.5%00/20/00/20/000000010-2.00%
2026-02-01vs CLE3026.76+12.1%218/155/73/82/211232022-5.066%
2026-01-30@ NYK2726.04+3.7%125/153/52/100/003342010-11.040%
2026-01-27@ WAS1728.21-39.7%62/82/70/12/411210010-5.031%
2026-01-26@ BOS26——115/144/71/70/012350020-2.039%

All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.

HISTORY

Season and milestone evidence

DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26

How often did the threshold occur?

historical frequency

These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.

20+ POINTS16.7%8/48 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/48 games
5+ ASSISTS8.3%4/48 games
2+ THREES52.1%25/48 games

SEASON HISTORY

Regular-season production

accepted player-safe games
SeasonTeam(s)GMINPTSREBASTFG%3P%FT%
2025–26POR4820.610.32.42.438.8%32.0%73.5%

CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY

No current roster binding for this historical profile

governed identity

This historical profile is not currently bound to the NBA Official 2026–27 roster product. ProbHoops does not infer a current team from historical data.

Open team profile

IMPACT

Rating and role context

AF-PLAYER

Measured production, 2025–26

#336 OF 409
AF-PLAYER34.1descriptive index, not a win probability
NBA RANK#336of 409 ranked
PH$6.7MDepth
SAMPLE48observed games
Ball security
74
Box defence
20
Creation
45
Efficiency
17
Rebounding
18
Scoring
56

PH$ is a free ProbHoops game currency. It is derived only from measured on-court production and position in that season's distribution. It is not salary, market value, contract value, trade price or betting value. How PH$ works.

PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26

Pregame role and with/without context

descriptive · not causal

Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.

POR

Portland Trail Blazers

EXPECTED MIN13.8
SCORING SHARE8.6%
CREATION SHARE10.5%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR64.8%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.