PROBHOOPS · NBA ANALYTICS · TEAMS · PLAYERS · PROBABILITIES
FIND ANYTHING

Teams & players

Start typing to search the ProbHoops directory.

Tip: press / anywhere to search.

PLAYER PROFILE · HISTORICAL

B. Barnhizer

Accepted historical regular-season production. No current 2026–27 roster status is inferred.

Oklahoma City Thunder · last observed team
AF-PLAYERPendingsample gate
NBA RANK—not ranked
PH$—pending · how PH$ works
STATUSHistoricalno current binding
EXPECTED MINWithheldonly when supported
NEXT GAMENo assigned gameSchedule pendingWHAT IF IMPACTWithheldteam win probability if OUT · model counterfactual
REGULAR-SEASON GAMES37

Player-safe accepted corpus.

CAREER PPG · CORPUS1.3

2019–20 through 2025–26 window.

CAREER RPG · CORPUS1.7

Historical window, not full NBA career.

CAREER APG · CORPUS0.5

Historical window, not full NBA career.

LATEST COMPLETED SEASON

2025–26

37 games
MIN7.5
PTS1.3
REB1.7
AST0.5
STL0.2
BLK0.1
3PM0.1
FG%37.7%
3P%29.4%
FT%66.7%
+/--1.6

NEXT GAME

Current context

No current roster binding is published for this historical profile. ProbHoops does not infer a current team, availability or expected minutes from historical data.

MINUTES + FORM

Role-adjusted performance

Current form is unavailable because this historical profile is not bound to the governed 2026–27 roster. No current role is inferred.

LATEST OBSERVED REFERENCE · 2025–26

Historical Minutes Intelligence

DESCRIPTIVE · NOT CURRENT

Expected minutes were frozen before each historical game. Role-Consistent means actual minutes stayed between 75% and 125% of that pregame reference. Low minutes are diagnostic only: ProbHoops does not infer rest, injury or a coaching decision from the box score.

LATEST ACTUAL0minutes
EXPECTED2.13pregame reference
DEVIATION-100%zero minutes reason unknown

LAST 5

ALL OBSERVED5 G0.4 PTS · 0.8 REB · 0 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT5 G0.8 PTS · 1 REB · 0.4 AST

LAST 10

ALL OBSERVED10 G0.2 PTS · 0.4 REB · 0.1 AST
ROLE-CONSISTENT9 G1.11 PTS · 1.33 REB · 0.33 AST

COLD historical run. This is a descriptive historical reference, not a next-game projection, AF-Player input, availability claim or causal diagnosis.

SPLITS + EFFICIENCY

How the production is built

EFFICIENCY

Shooting, derived from the box score

CAREER · 37 GAMES

2PM and 2PA need no source: a two-pointer is a field goal that was not a three. eFG% credits the extra point a three is worth; TS% is the only one of these that accounts for free throws. A rate below its attempt floor is shown as — rather than as a flattering number.

FIELD GOALS37.7%20/53
2-POINT41.7%15/36
3-POINT29.4%5/17
FREE THROW—4/6
EFFECTIVE FG%42.4%
TRUE SHOOTING%44.0%
AST / TO2.38
PTS PER 366.35rate, not projection

HOME / AWAY

Where the games were played

17 HOME · 20 AWAY
SplitGMINPTSREBAST3PMSTLBLK
Home176.821.291.590.590.060.240.06
Away208.11.351.850.450.20.150.15
Home − Away—-1.3-0.1-0.3+0.1-0.1+0.1-0.1

Home minus away, computed only when both sides reach the sample floor. A difference is a measurement, not a home-court effect.

CONSISTENCY

What the average hides

37 GAMES

Two players averaging the same points can be 20-21-24 and 5-38-12. Floor, median and ceiling are the 20th / 50th / 80th percentile, linearly interpolated.

CategoryFloorMedianCeilingMeanVolatility
assists0010.51high
minutes37127.51high
points0021.32high
rebounds0131.73high

Percentiles, not minimum and maximum: one exceptional night is not a ceiling.

DOUBLE-DOUBLES

Observed frequency across the corpus

37 GAMES
DOUBLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
TRIPLE-DOUBLES00.0% of games
10+ ASSISTS00.0%
10+ BLOCKS00.0%

Observed frequency across the measured corpus, not a forecast. Category probabilities are not multiplied together: production categories are dependent through minutes and role.

GAME LOG · 2025–26

One log, the window you choose

10 games
DateOppMINEXP MINMIN ΔPTSFG2P3PFTORDRREBASTSTLBLKTOVPF+/-TS%
2026-04-07@ LAL61.18+409.3%21/21/20/00/022400001-1.050%
2026-04-02vs LAL51.58+216.2%00/10/10/00/000011000-1.00%
2026-03-23@ PHI21.52+31.2%00/00/00/00/0000000000.0—
2026-03-21@ WAS52.55+95.8%00/00/00/00/012300000+1.0—
2026-03-07vs GSW124.36+175.2%21/11/10/00/010120000+9.0100%
2026-03-03@ CHI24.13-51.6%00/00/00/00/000000000-9.0—
2026-02-25@ DET222.49+782.8%00/30/20/10/002201111+6.00%
2026-02-20vs BKN24.8-58.4%00/00/00/00/002200000+3.0—
2026-02-12vs MIL73.83+82.7%00/20/10/10/005520100+2.00%
2026-02-04@ SAS20——145/151/64/90/012350024-11.047%

All E57 box-score columns remain available. E65 adds the frozen expected-minutes reference and deviation without removing any observed box-score field. The table scrolls inside its own region on narrow screens; highlighted rows are double-doubles and the strongest highlight is a triple-double.

HISTORY

Season and milestone evidence

DESCRIPTIVE MILESTONES · 2025–26

How often did the threshold occur?

historical frequency

These are observed historical frequencies, not current model probabilities and not betting lines.

20+ POINTS0.0%0/37 games
10+ REBOUNDS0.0%0/37 games
5+ ASSISTS2.7%1/37 games
2+ THREES2.7%1/37 games

SEASON HISTORY

Regular-season production

accepted player-safe games
SeasonTeam(s)GMINPTSREBASTFG%3P%FT%
2025–26OKC377.51.31.70.537.7%29.4%66.7%

CURRENT / HISTORICAL BOUNDARY

No current roster binding for this historical profile

governed identity

This historical profile is not currently bound to the NBA Official 2026–27 roster product. ProbHoops does not infer a current team from historical data.

Open team profile

IMPACT

Rating and role context

AF-PLAYER

Measured production, 2025–26

PENDING SAMPLE

ProbHoops has observed 37 games of this player in 2025–26 — below the sample floor required to rank. He carries no AF-Player and no PH$. Pending means not enough observation, never a low score.

PLAYER IMPACT · 2025–26

Pregame role and with/without context

descriptive · not causal

Role measures are based on information frozen before games. With/without appears only when the historical sample passes the research gate; it does not prove that an absence caused the observed team change.

OKC

Oklahoma City Thunder

EXPECTED MIN3.5
SCORING SHARE1.3%
CREATION SHARE2.3%
PARTICIPATION PRIOR48.2%

With/without sample did not qualify for publication.